二氧化碳电还原为甲烷的研究进展

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63967-0

催化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1634-1641.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63967-0

• 二氧化碳催化转化专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

二氧化碳电还原为甲烷的研究进展

郑汉^,^†, 杨正午^,^†, 孔祥栋, 耿志刚(), 曾杰()

合肥微尺度物质科学国家研究中心, 中国科学院强耦合量子材料物理重点实验室, 安徽省教育厅表界面化学与能源催化重点实验室, 中国科学技术大学化学物理系, 安徽合肥230026

收稿日期:2021-09-29 接受日期:2021-11-03 出版日期:2022-07-18 发布日期:2022-05-20
通讯作者: 耿志刚,曾杰
作者简介:第一联系人：
^†共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(U1932146);国家自然科学基金(92061111);国家自然科学基金(U19A2015);国家杰出青年科学基金(21925204);中国科学院前沿科学重点研究计划(QYZDB-SSW-SLH017)

Progresses on carbon dioxide electroreduction into methane

Han Zheng^,^†, Zhengwu Yang^,^†, Xiangdong Kong, Zhigang Geng(), Jie Zeng()

Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Key Laboratory of Strongly-Coupled Quantum Matter Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Chemistry and Energy Catalysis of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Department of Chemical Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China

Received:2021-09-29 Accepted:2021-11-03 Online:2022-07-18 Published:2022-05-20
Contact: Zhigang Geng, Jie Zeng
About author:First author contact:
^†Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1932146);National Natural Science Foundation of China(92061111);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U19A2015);National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars(21925204);Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the CAS(QYZDB-SSW-SLH017)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过电化学手段将CO₂转化为高附加值的化学品和燃料是缓解能源短缺与环境危机的一种重要方法. 在电还原过程制备的所有含碳产物中, CH₄拥有最高的热值(56 kJ/g), 是最重要的化学键能储备载体之一. 本文以先前报道的反应机理为出发点, 从催化剂设计策略的角度总结了CO₂电还原制CH₄的最新研究进展. 催化剂设计策略包括亚纳米催化位点构筑、界面调控、原位结构演变以及串联催化剂构筑. 基于已有的理论预测与实验结果, 获取对制备CH₄反应机理更深层次的理解, 进而反馈指导高效催化剂的设计合成.

亚纳米催化位点构筑可有效抑制反应过程中的C‒C偶联, 进而提升CO₂电还原制CH₄的催化性能. 界面调控利用活性相与衬底间的协同作用, 可优化含氧中间体的结合能, 确保反应按预期路径进行. 原位结构演变可构建热力学稳定的活性相, 进而增强CO₂电还原制CH₄的催化活性. 串联催化通过构筑多种活性位点将总包反应分为不同阶段, 可有效打破吸附中间体比例关系限制, 进而提升目标产物的选择性.

尽管上述策略对提高CH₄催化性能具有极大优势, 但未来这些策略的实施仍存在巨大挑战. 对于亚纳米催化剂的构筑方法, 着重于原子级水平, 以解决活性相易团聚和负载量低的问题. 界面调控容易受多种因素影响, 包括晶粒大小, 界面位点浓度和界面原子取向, 因此, 界面调控的主要挑战在于如何在排除上述干扰的前提下研究界面调控对催化剂本征活性的影响. 通过准原位/原位技术捕获关键反应中间体以及监测催化剂的原位结构演变, 可有效预测反应途径并确定本征活性位点. 因此需大力拓展准原位/原位技术种类. 对于串联催化剂, 应致力于定量评估不同活性位点对整体催化性能的贡献, 以及探究反应中间体在不同串联组分之间的迁移规律. 另外, 通过发展同位素标记手段以追溯产物来源, 探索反应动力学过程; 结合机器学习等理论计算方法来广泛筛选活性催化剂组成; 设计膜电极组件装置以解决催化反应过程中的传质/传热动力学问题等, 也是高效实现CO₂电还原制CH₄的关键因素.

关键词: CO₂电还原, CH₄合成, 催化剂设计

Abstract:

The conversion of CO₂ into value-added chemicals and fuels via electrochemical methods paves a promising avenue to mitigate both energy and environmental crisis. Among all the carbonaceous products derived from CO₂ electroreduction, CH₄ is one of the most important carriers for chemical bond energy storage due to the highest value of mass heat. Herein, starting from the proposed reaction mechanisms reported previously, we summarized the recent progresses on CO₂ electroreduction into CH₄ from the perspective of catalyst design strategies including construction of sub-nanometer catalytic sites, modulation of interfaces, in-situ structural evolution, and engineering of tandem catalysts. On the basis of both the previously theoretical predictions and experimental results, we aimed to gain insights into the reaction mechanism for the formation of CH₄, which, in turn, would provide guidelines for the design of highly efficient catalysts.

Key words: CO₂ electroreduction, CH₄ formation, Design of catalyst

郑汉, 杨正午, 孔祥栋, 耿志刚, 曾杰. 二氧化碳电还原为甲烷的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1634-1641.

Han Zheng, Zhengwu Yang, Xiangdong Kong, Zhigang Geng, Jie Zeng. Progresses on carbon dioxide electroreduction into methane[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(7): 1634-1641.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63967-0

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2022/V43/I7/1634

图/表 6

Fig. 1. (a) Scheme of the reaction pathway for CO2 electroreduction to CH4; UL for elementary proton-transfer steps as a function of the binding energy for CO (EB[CO]) (b) and OH (EB[OH]) (c) over various electrocatalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [22]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 2. (a) HAADF-STEM image for SA-Zn/MNC. The bright dots were Zn atoms, some of which were highlighted by yellow circles. (b) EXAFS spectra for SA-Zn/MNC and standard samples. (c) FE for CH4 over SA-Zn/MNC at various applied potentials towards CO2 electroreduction. (d) The j and yield rate of CH4 over SA-Zn/MNC plotted against the concentration of CO2-saturated KHCO3 at -1.8 V vs. SCE. (e) Free energy diagrams for CO2 electroreduction into CH4 on Zn-N4-graphene at 0 and 0.87 V. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [33]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 3. (a) TEM image of Cu/CeO2?x HDs. The insert showed the corresponding EDX elemental mapping of an individual Cu/CeO2?x HD. (b) FE and j for the products involved in CO2 electroreaction over CeO2?x nanocrystals (CeO2?x NCs), Cu NCs, Cu-CeO2?x mix, Cu/CeO2?x HDs at -1.2 V vs. RHE. (c) Charge exchange map between Cu(111) slab and CeO2?x cluster. The red and green isosurfaces were the enrichment and depletion regions, respectively. Ce, Cu, O, and H atoms in (c) were represented with blue spheres with sizes following the order of Ce > Cu > O > H. (d) Partial density of states (PDOS) of the d-orbital of an interfacial Cu atom with and without CeO2?x cluster. Breaking scaling relations of CO*/CHO* (e) and H2CO*/OH* (f) through bidentate adsorption. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 4. (a) Scheme for the structural evolution of La2CuO4 perovskite during CO2 electroreduction. Color code: Cu, brick red; La, blue; O, red; C, gray; H, white. (b) HRTEM image and corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset) of the Cu/La2CuO4. (c) XRD pattern of Cu/La2CuO4. (d) FE for the products involved in CO2 electroreduction over Cu/La2CuO4 at various applied potentials. (e) Chronoamperometric tests over Cu/La2CuO4 at various applied potentials. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 5. (a) A proposed tandem mechanism of CO2 electroreduction into CH4 over CoPc@Zn-N-C. FE (b) and j (c) for CH4 towards CO2 electroreduction over various catalysts. (d) The free energy profile and optimized configurations of intermediates towards CO2 electroreduction into CH4. Part (1) was CO2 electroreduction into CO while part (2) represented CO electroreduction into CH4 over both CoPc and ZnN4. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons.

Table 1 Comparision of catalytic performance for recently reported electrocatalysts towards CO2 electroreduction into CH4.

Catalyst	Electrolyte/cell	Potential (V vs. RHE)	FE(CH₄) (%)	j(CH₄) (mA cm^-2)	Stability (h)	Ref.
Cu₂O@CuHHTP	0.1 mol/L KCl+0.1 mol/L KHCO₃/H Cell	-1.4	73	-10.8	5	[20]
Cu-N-C-900	0.1 mol/L KHCO₃/H Cell	-1.6	38.6	-14.8	10	[32]
SA-Zn/MNC	1 mol/L KHCO₃/H Cell	~-1.2	85	-31.8	35	[33]
Cu-CeO₂-4%	0.1 mol/L KHCO₃/H cell	-1.8	58	-56	2.5	[34]
Cu Clusters/DRC	0.5 mol/L KHCO₃/H Cell	-1.0	81.7	-18	40	[35]
CoO/Cu/PTFE	1 mol/L KHCO₃/Flow Cell	-1.1	60	-135	18	[36]
Cu/CeO_2-_x HDs	0.1 mol/L KHCO₃/H cell	-1.2	54	~-1.62	12.5	[40]
Au-Pb	0.5 mol/L KHCO₃/H Cell	-1.07	2.8	~-0.30	3	[41]
CuPc	0.5 mol/L KHCO₃/H cell	-1.06	66	-13	—	[42]
Cu/La₂CuO₄	1 mol/L KOH/Flow Cell	-1.4	56.3	-117	0.28	[48]
Cu₆₈Ag₃₂	0.5 mol/L KHCO₃/H cell	-1.17	60	~-50	50	[49]
Tandem Ag-Cu	0.1 mol/L NaHCO₃/H Cell	-1.1	60	-5.04	2	[51]
CoPc@Zn-N-C	1 mol/L KOH/Flow Cell	-1.24	18.3	-44.3	—	[52]
Pyramid Cu-Ag	0.2 mol/L KHCO₃/H cell	-1.1	62	-12.7	12	[55]
Cu NWs	0.1 mol/L KHCO₃/H cell	-1.25	55	~-7.8	3	[56]

参考文献

[1]	S. Zhang, Q. Fan, R. Xia, T. J. Meyer, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 255-264.
[2]	X. Kong, J. Ke, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Zhou, Z. Yang, W. Yan, Z. Geng, J. Zeng, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 290, 120067.
[3]	S. Chu, Y. Cui, N. Liu, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16, 16-22.
[4]	D. Kim, K. K. Sakimoto, D. Hong, P. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 3259-3266.
[5]	Z. Wang, H. Song, H. Liu, J. Ye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 8016-8035.
[6]	L. Hao, Q. Xia, Q. Zhang, J. Masa, Z. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 1903-1920.
[7]	D. Yang, Q. Zhu, C. Chen, H. Liu, Z. Liu, Z. Zhao, X. Zhang, S. Liu, B. Han, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 677.
[8]	H. Liu, X. Meng, W. Yang, G. Zhao, D. He, J. Ye, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 1976-1982.
[9]	R. G. Grim, Z. Huang, M. T. Guarnieri, J. R. Ferrell, L. Tao, J. A. Schaidle, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 472-494.
[10]	X. Kong, C. Wang, H. Zheng, Z. Geng, J. Bao, J. Zeng, Sci. China Chem., 2021, 64, 1096-1102.
[11]	M. Wang, Q. Xie, H. Chen, G. Liu, X. Cui, L. Jiang, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 2306-2312.
[12]	W. Zhang, Y. Hu, L. Ma, G. Zhu, Y. Wang, X. Xue, R. Chen, S. Yang, Z. Jin, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1700275.
[13]	W. Gao, S. Liang, R. Wang, Q. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Q. Zheng, B. Xie, C. Y. Toe, X. Zhu, J. Wang, L. Huang, Y. Gao, Z. Wang, C. Jo, Q. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Liu, B. Louis, J. Scott, A.-C. Roger, R. Amal, H. Heh, S.-E. Park, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 8584-8686.
[14]	D. Gao, R. M. Arán-Ais, H. S. Jeon, B. Roldan Cuenya, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 198-210.
[15]	A. Caballero, P. J. Pérez, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 8809-8820.
[16]	L. Sun, Y. Wang, N. Guan, L. Li, Energy Technol., 2020, 8, 1900826.
[17]	E. V. Kondratenko, G. Mul, J. Baltrusaitis, G. O. Larrazábalc, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3112-3135.
[18]	X. Wang, A. Xu, F. Li, S.-F. Hung, D.-H. Nam, C. M. Gabardo, Z. Wang, Y. Xu, A. Ozden, A. S. Rasouli, A. H. Ip, D. Sinton, E. H. Sargent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 3525-3531.
[19]	S. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, S. B. Scott, X. Liu, A. K. Engstfeld, S. Horch, B. Seger, I. E. L. Stephens, K. Chan, C. Hahn, J. K. Nørskov, T. F. Jaramillo, I. Chorkendorff, Chem. Rev., 119, 7610-7672.
[20]	J.-D. Yi, R. Xie, Z.-L. Xie, G.-L. Chai, T.-F. Liu, R.-P. Chen, Y.-B. Huang, R. Cao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 23641-23648.
[21]	A. A. Peterson, F. Abild-Pedersen, F. Studt, J. Rossmeisl, J. K. Nørskov, Energy Environ. Sci., 2010, 3, 1311-1315.
[22]	A. A. Peterson, J. K. Nørskov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 251-258.
[23]	X. Nie, M. R. Esopi, M. J. Janik, A. Asthagiri, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2459-2462.
[24]	D. W. DeWulf, T. Jin, A. J. Bard, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1989, 136, 1686-1691.
[25]	K. P. Kuhl, T. Hatsukade, E. R. Cave, D. N. Abram, J. Kibsgaard, T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 14107-14113.
[26]	X. Wang, P. Su, M. S. Duyar, J. Liu, Energy Fuels, 2021, 35, 9795-9808.
[27]	M. Jia, S. Hong, T.-S. Wu, X. Li, Y.-L. Soo, Z. Sun, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 12024-12027.
[28]	Y.-F. Bu, M. Zhao, G.-X. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Gao, Q. Jiang, ChemElectroChem, 2019, 6, 1831-1837.
[29]	S. K. Iyemperumal, N. A. Deskins, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 28788-28807.
[30]	J. Liu, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 34-59.
[31]	J. M. Thomas, R. Raja, D. W. Lewis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 6456-6482.
[32]	A. Guan, Z. Chen, Y. Quan, C. Peng, Z. Wang, T. Sham, C. Yang, Y. Ji, L. Qian, X. Xu, G. Zheng, ACS Energy Lett., 2020, 5, 1044-1055.
[33]	L. Han, S. Song, M. Liu, S. Yao, Z. Liang, H. Cheng, Z. Ren, W. Liu, R. Lin, G. Qi, X. Liu, Q. Wu, J. Luo, H. L. Xin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 12563-12567.
[34]	Y. Wang, Z. Chen, P. Han, Y. Du, Z. Gu, X. Xu, G. Zheng, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 7113-7119.
[35]	Q. Hu, Z. Han, X. Wang, G. Li, Z. Wang, X. Huang, H. Yang, X. Ren, Q. Zhang, J. Liu, C. He, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 19054-19059.
[36]	Y. Li, A. Xu, Y. Lum, X. Wang, S.-F. Hung, B. Chen, Z. Wang, Y. Xu, F. Li, J. Abed, J. E. Huang, A. S. Rasouli, J. Wicks, L. K. Sagar, T. Peng, A. H. Ip, D. Sinton, H. Jiang, C. Li, E. H. Sargent, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 6190.
[37]	X. Chang, T. Wang, Z.-J. Zhao, P. Yang, J. Greeley, R. Mu, G. Zhang, Z. Gong, Z. Luo, J. Chen, Y. Cui, G. A. Ozin, J. Gong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 15415-15419.
[38]	R. Wang, R. Jiang, C. Dong, T. Tong, Z. Li, H. Liu, X.-W. Du, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2021, 60, 273-280.
[39]	T. Tsujiguchi, Y. Kawabe, S. Jeong, T. Ohto, S. Kukunuri, H. Kuramochi, Y. Takahashi, T. Nishiuchi, H. Masuda, M. Wakisaka, K. Hu, G. Elumalai, J. Fujita, Y. Ito, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 3310-3318.
[40]	S. B. Varandili, J. Huang, E. Oveisi, G. L. D. Gregorio, M. Mensi, M. Strach, J. Vavra, C. Gadiyar, A. Bhowmik, R. Buonsanti, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 5035-5046.
[41]	A. M. Ismail, G. F. Samu, H. C. Nguyen, E. Csapó, N. Lopez, C. Janáky, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 5681-5690.
[42]	Z. Weng, Y. Wu, M. Wang, J. Jiang, K. Yang, S. Huo, X. Wang, Q. Ma, G. W. Brudvig, V. S. Batista, Y. Liang, Z. Feng, H. Wang, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 415.
[43]	A. Zhang, Y. Liang, H. Li, B. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Chang, H. Zhang, C. Zhu, Z. Geng, W. Zhu, J. Zeng, Nano lett., 2020, 20, 8229-8235.
[44]	Y. Zhao, X. Tan, W. Yang, C. Jia, X. Chen, W. Ren, S. C. Smith, C. Zhao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 21493-21498.
[45]	H. Jiang, Q. He, Y. Zhang, L. Song, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 2968-2977.
[46]	C. He, D. Duan, J. Low, Y. Bai, Y. Jiang, X. Wang, S. Chen, R. Long, L. Song, Y. Xiong, Nano Res., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3532-7.
[47]	W. Luo, Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, E. Moioli, K. Zhao, A. Züttel, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 273, 119060.
[48]	S. Chen, Y. Su, P. Deng, R. Qi, J. Zhu, J. Chen, Z. Wang, L. Zhou, X. Guo, B. Y. Xia, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 4640-4646.
[49]	C.-J. Chang, S.-C. Lin, H.-C. Chen, J. Wang, K. J. Zheng, Y. Zhu, H. M. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 12119-12132.
[50]	Z. Ma, M. D. Porosoff, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 2639-2656.
[51]	H. Zhang, X. Chang, J. G. Chen, W. A. Goddard III, B. Xu, M. Cheng, Q. Lu, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 3340.
[52]	L. Lin, T. Liu, J. Xiao, H. Li, P. Wei, D. Gao, B. Nan, R. Si, G. Wang, X. Bao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 22408-22413.
[53]	P. De Luna, W. Liang, A. Mallick, O. Shekhah, F. P. G. de Arquer, A. H. Proppe, P. Todorović, S. O. Kelley, E. H. Sargent, M. Eddaoudi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 31225-31232.
[54]	Y. Zhu, X. Cui, H. Liu, Z. Guo, Y. Dang, Z. Fan, Z. Zhang, W. Hu, Nano Res., 2021, 14, 4471-4486.
[55]	Y. Liu, H. Qiu, J. Li, L. Guo, J. W. Ager, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 40513-40521.
[56]	Y. Li, F. Cui, M. B. Ross, D. Kim, Y. Sun, P. Yang, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 1312-1317.
[57]	W. Ma, S. Xie, T. Liu, Q. Fan, J. Ye, F. Sun, Z. Jiang, Q. Zhang, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Nat. Catal., 2020, 3, 478-487.
[58]	Y. Liu, Q. Li, X. Guo, X. Kong, J. Ke, M. Chi, Q. Li, Z. Geng, J. Zeng, Adv. Mater., 2020, 32, 1907690.

二氧化碳电还原为甲烷的研究进展

Progresses on carbon dioxide electroreduction into methane

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 6

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	蒋亚飞, 刘锦程, 许聪俏, 李隽, 肖海. 打破合成氨反应中线性标度关系的碗型活性位点设计: 来自LaRuSi及其同构电子化物的启示[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2183-2192.
[2]	Ernest Pahuyo Delmo, 王忆安, 王菁, 朱尚乾, 李铁怀, 秦雪苹, 田一博, 赵青蓝, Juhee Jang, 王一诺, 谷猛, 张莉莉, 邵敏华. 金属有机框架-离子液体混合催化剂用于电化学还原二氧化碳生成甲烷[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1687-1696.
[3]	刘储浩, 吴悦, 方锦杰, 余坷, 李慧, 贺文君, 张永臻, 柳守杰, 陈郑, 董京, 陈晨. 氮掺杂碳催化剂在高效电化学CO₂还原中的协同效应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1697-1702.
[4]	孙倩, 贾忱, 赵勇, 赵川. 单原子基催化剂用于电化学CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1547-1597.
[5]	王梦茹, 王奕, 牟效玲, 林荣和, 丁云杰. 1,3-丁二烯选择性加氢催化剂的设计策略以及构效关系[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1017-1041.
[6]	王同宝, 韩光泰, 王子运, 王昱沆. 克服高温二氧化碳电解产生的碳沉积问题[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(12): 2938-2945.
[7]	吴建祥, 杨雪晶, 龚鸣. 甘油电催化氧化的研究进展：催化剂、机理和应用[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(12): 2966-2986.
[8]	陈霄, 石闯, 梁长海. 炔醇选择加氢催化剂研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(12): 2105-2121.
[9]	王敏, 解琦, 陈会敏, 刘光波, 崔学晶, 姜鲁华. N,O共修饰的Ni纳米颗粒/氮掺杂介孔碳CO₂高效电还原催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(12): 2306-2312.
[10]	邵加奇, 王毅, 高敦峰, 叶克, 王琪, 汪国雄. Cu-In二元金属催化剂上CO₂电化学还原[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(9): 1393-1400.
[11]	李国栋, 覃永杰, 吴玉, 裴蕾, 胡琪, 杨恒攀, 张黔玲, 刘剑洪, 何传新. 氮硫共掺杂高比表面中空碳球的制备及其在电催化二氧化碳还原中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(5): 830-838.
[12]	Anders B. Laursen, Jens Sehested, Ib Chorkendorff, Peter C. K. Vesborg. 多相催化元素的有效性:新型催化剂的工业活性预测[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(1): 16-26.
[13]	李翔, 杨思勰, 冯宁宁, 何平, 周豪慎. Li-CO₂电池机理、催化剂和性能研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2016, 37(7): 1016-1024.
[14]	姚芳莲;陈锦言;邓联东;孟继红;许涌深;孙经武. 一氧化碳/苯乙烯共聚催化体系的优化[J]. 催化学报, 1999, 20(2): 155-160.