非常规亚稳态立方相二维LaMnO3用于高效碱性海水析氧反应

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64667-5

催化学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 74: 228-239.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64667-5

非常规亚稳态立方相二维LaMnO₃用于高效碱性海水析氧反应

代继澳^a^,^b^,¹, 鲜靖林^a^,¹, 刘凯思^a^,¹, 吴植傲^a, 樊淼^a, 覃姝彤^a, 姜会钰^a, 徐卫林^a, 金桓宇^b^,^*(), 万骏^a^,^*()

^a武汉纺织大学化学化工学院, 纺织新材料与先进加工全国重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430200
^b中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院, 材料科学与工程系/碳中和技术研究所, 广东深圳 518055

收稿日期:2025-01-09 接受日期:2025-02-14 出版日期:2025-07-18 发布日期:2025-07-20
通讯作者: *电子信箱: wanj@wtu.edu.cn (万骏),hy.jin2@siat.ac.cn (金桓宇).
作者简介:¹共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52203070);湖北省自然科学基金(2025AFB863);纺织新材料与先进加工技术国家重点实验室开放基金(FZ2022005)

Unconventional metastable cubic 2D LaMnO₃ for efficient alkaline seawater oxygen evolution

Ji’ao Dai^a^,^b^,¹, Jinglin Xian^a^,¹, Kaisi Liu^a^,¹, Zhiao Wu^a, Miao Fan^a, Shutong Qin^a, Huiyu Jiang^a, Weilin Xu^a, Huanyu Jin^b^,^*(), Jun Wan^a^,^*()

^aState Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, Hubei, China
^bFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering/Institute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China

Received:2025-01-09 Accepted:2025-02-14 Online:2025-07-18 Published:2025-07-20
Contact: *E-mail: wanj@wtu.edu.cn (J. Wan), hy.jin2@siat.ac.cn (H. Jin).
About author:¹Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52203070);Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2025AFB863);Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing Technologies(FZ2022005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

海水电解制氢作为可持续氢气生产的重要途径, 近年来在碳中和能源战略的背景下引起了广泛关注. 然而, 海水中的析氧反应(OER)由于其缓慢的反应动力学及腐蚀性环境, 导致其效率较低, 因此亟需开发高效的电催化剂. 钙钛矿氧化物, 特别是二维LaMnO₃材料, 具有较大的比表面积和可调的电子结构, 已成为研究的热点. 然而, 传统的菱方相LaMnO₃虽然在电子导电性方面表现优异, 但其较短的层间距和有限的氧扩散能力显著限制了其在OER中的催化性能. 因此, 开发新型催化剂, 通过调控其相结构和电子性质以提升催化效能, 具有重要意义.

为克服菱方相LaMnO₃的局限性, 本文提出了一种创新的微波热冲法, 通过Co掺杂快速合成二维LaMnO₃, 并精确调控其相结构, 形成了菱方相、六方相和非常规亚稳态立方相. 该方法的核心优势在于, 能够在低温条件下保持二维结构的同时, 精确调控相转变, 尤其是促进亚稳态立方相的形成. 传统的高温合成方法通常难以实现此类相转变, 而微波热冲法为材料的热力学和动力学过程提供了高效的控制机制, 从而确保了不同相的快速生成. 通过对合成材料的表征, 发现亚稳态立方相在OER中展现出优异的催化性能. 与稳定的菱方相相比, 立方相具有优化的层间距和更高的对称性, 这有助于氧中间体的高效吸附与脱附, 从而加速反应的四电子转移过程. X射线吸收光谱揭示了立方相的电子结构和金属-氧共价性, 而密度泛函理论计算显示了最佳的轨道重叠, 共同表明这些特征有助于氧中间体的有效形成与解吸, 进而加速OER的速率控制步骤在常规OER反应中, 合成的亚稳态立方二维LaMnO₃电催化剂在10 mA cm^-2的电流密度下, 表现出293 mV的过电位和68.7 mV dec^-1的Tafel斜率, 显著优于大多数常规相材料. 此外, 催化剂在模拟海水中的表现也同样突出, 模拟海水中的Tafel斜率为71.1 mV dec^-1, 真实海水中的Tafel斜率为99.0 mV dec^-1, 且在400 mA cm^-2的高电流密度下, 展现出超过100 h的卓越稳定性.

综上所述, 本研究通过微波热冲法成功实现了二维LaMnO₃的相变调控, 并显著提升了其在海水中析氧反应的催化性能. 这不仅缓解了传统钙钛矿氧化物在海水电解中的应用瓶颈, 也为新型高效催化剂的设计和应用提供了新的策略. 未来, 二维材料的相工程将继续推动OER催化剂的高效化与稳定化, 特别是在海水电解水制氢领域的应用中. 本文提出的微波热冲法为合成具有优异催化性能的亚稳态相材料提供了新的合成策略, 并为二维材料相工程在其他领域的应用奠定了理论基础. 随着相工程技术的不断发展, 预计将涌现出更多具有优异稳定性和高效性的催化剂, 为绿色氢气生成提供更加坚实的技术支持.

关键词: 亚稳态相, 相工程, 二维材料, 微波, 海水析氧反应

Abstract:

The electrolysis of alkaline seawater is critical for sustainable hydrogen production but is hindered by the sluggish oxygen evolution reaction in saline environments. Advanced electrocatalysts with tailored structures and electronic properties are essential, and phase engineering provides a transformative approach by modulating crystallographic symmetry and electronic configurations. Two-dimensional (2D) LaMnO₃ perovskites show promise due to their exposed active sites and tunable electronic properties. However, the conventional stable rhombohedral phase limits oxygen diffusion despite good electron transport. Unconventional metastable phases with superior symmetry enhance lattice oxygen activity in saline environments but are challenging to synthesize. Herein, we propose a microwave shock method incorporating Co atoms to rapidly produce 2D LaMnO₃ in rhombohedral, hexagonal, and metastable cubic phases. This strategy circumvents the limitations of high-temperature synthesis, preserving the 2D morphology while enabling the formation of metastable cubic phases. The metastable cubic phase exhibits superior OER activity and stability even in alkaline seawater due to optimal symmetry, interlayer spacing, and Mn-O covalency. X-ray absorption spectroscopy and theoretical calculations further highlight its balanced oxygen adsorption and desorption. This work underscores the role of metastable phase engineering in advancing seawater electrolysis and establishes a scalable route for designing high-performance 2D electrocatalysts.

Key words: Metastable phase, Phase engineering, Two-dimensional material, Microwave, Seawater oxygen evolution

代继澳, 鲜靖林, 刘凯思, 吴植傲, 樊淼, 覃姝彤, 姜会钰, 徐卫林, 金桓宇, 万骏. 非常规亚稳态立方相二维LaMnO₃用于高效碱性海水析氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74: 228-239.

Ji’ao Dai, Jinglin Xian, Kaisi Liu, Zhiao Wu, Miao Fan, Shutong Qin, Huiyu Jiang, Weilin Xu, Huanyu Jin, Jun Wan. Unconventional metastable cubic 2D LaMnO₃ for efficient alkaline seawater oxygen evolution[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 74: 228-239.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64667-5

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2025/V74/I7/228

图/表 5

Fig. 1. Microwave-induced phase engineering for enhanced OER catalysis. (A) Transformation of crystal phase structure under microwave shock method. (B) Relationship between interlayer spacing and charge transfer energy. (C) The OER performance comparison of different catalysts.

Fig. 2. Synthesis of LaCo0.5Mn0.5O3 and detailed structural characterization of LMO-xCo. (A) Schematic diagram of LaCo0.5Mn0.5O3 synthesis by traditional hydrothermal method. (B) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of 2D LaMnO3 nanosheets by microwave shock method, followed by refined XRD analysis of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7). (C) Variation in metal-O-metal bond length and metal-O-metal angle for R-LMO-0Co, C-LMO-0.5Co and H-LMO-0.7Co. TEM images of R-LMO-0Co (D), C-LMO-0.5Co (E), and H-LMO-0.7Co (F). HRTEM images of R-LMO-0Co (G), C-LMO-0.5Co (H), and H-LMO-0.7Co (I) with inset the corresponding SAED patterns images.

Fig. 3. Electrocatalytic performance of LMO-xCo catalysts in OER. (A) LSV curves of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) and RuO? based catalyst supported on a glass carbon electrode in an N2-saturated 1 mol L-1 KOH solution. Inset, Tafel plots extracted from LSV curves. (B) Overpotential and Tafel data of catalysts. (C) Mass activities and TOF of catalysts at 1.55 V. (D) Bandgap of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7). (E) Diagram of the bandgap change between R-LMO-0Co and C-LMO-0.5Co. (F) E-t plots of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) at 10 mA cm-2 with inset showing durability test of C-LMO-0.5Co.

Fig. 4. Electronic structure and reaction mechanisms of LMO-xCo catalysts. (A) Mn K-edge XANES spectra of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.5, 0.7). (B) O K-edge XANES spectra of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.5, 0.7). (C) LOM reaction mechanism diagram. (D-F) WT-EXAFS plots of LMO-xCo (x = 0, 0.5, 0.7). (G) PDOS of O 2p orbitals in LMO-xCo. (H) PDOS of Mn (and Co) 3d orbitals in LMO-xCo. (I) Trend analysis of variations in the d-band center and p-band center for LMO-xCo. The inset illustrates the schematic of the density of states for perovskite oxides.

Fig. 5. Catalytic performance of C-LMO-0.5Co for seawater electrolysis. (A) LSV curves for simulated and real seawater electrolysis. (B) Corresponding Tafel plots for the electrolysis of simulated and real seawater. (C) Overpotential summary at 100 and 400 mA cm-2 for electrolysis in simulated and real seawater. (D) Performance advantages of C-LMO-0.5Co and overpotential comparison of various catalysts for seawater electrolysis at 100 mA cm-2. (E) Stability test of C-LMO-0.5Co at 400 mA cm-2 current density. (F) ICP-MS analysis of La, Mn, and Co elemental content in the electrolyte after stability testing.

参考文献

[1]	X. Duan, Q. Sha, P. Li, T. Li, G. Yang, W. Liu, E. Yu, D. Zhou, J. Fang, W. Chen, Y. Chen, L. Zheng, J. Liao, Z. Wang, Y. Li, H. Yang, G. Zhang, Z. Zhuang, S.-F. Hung, C. Jing, J. Luo, L. Bai, J. Dong, H. Xiao, W. Liu, Y. Kuang, B. Liu, X. Sun, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 1973.
[2]	D. Zhang, H. Cheng, X. Hao, Q. Sun, T. Zhang, X. Xu, Z. Ma, T. Yang, J. Ding, X. Liu, M. Yang, X. Huang, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 15581-15590.
[3]	S. Sultan, M. Ha, D. Y. Kim, J. N. Tiwari, C. W. Myung, A. Meena, T. J. Shin, K. H. Chae, K. S. Kim, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 5195.
[4]	M. Yu, E. Budiyanto, H. Tuysuz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202103824.
[5]	Y. Song, K. Ji, H. Duan, M. Shao, Exploration, 2021, 1, 20210050.
[6]	H. Zeng, Y. Zeng, J. Qi, L. Gu, E. Hong, R. Si, C. Yang, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 139-147.
[7]	X. Yu, Z. Pan, C. Pei, L. Lin, Y. Lu, H. S. Park, H. Pang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2024, 35, 108484.
[8]	X. Han, N. Li, J. S. Baik, P. Xiong, Y. Kang, Q. Dou, Q. Liu, J. Y. Lee, C. S. Kim, H. S. Park, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33, 2212233.
[9]	T. L. Leung, I. Ahmad, A. A. Syed, A. M. C. Ng, J. Popović, A. B. Djurišić, Commun. Mater., 2022, 3, 63.
[10]	R. Rodriguez-Lamas, C. Pirovano, A. Stangl, D. Pla, R. Jónsson, L. Rapenne, E. Sarigiannidou, N. Nuns, H. Roussel, O. Chaix-Pluchery, M. Boudard, C. Jiménez, R.-N. Vannier, M. Burriel, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 12721-12733.
[11]	V. Kotha, I. Karajagi, P. C. Ghosh, L. S. Panchakarla, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2022, 5, 7297-7307.
[12]	Q. Li, J. Wu, T. Wu, H. Jin, N. Zhang, J. Li, W. Liang, M. Liu, L. Huang, J. Zhou, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2102002.
[13]	L. B. Liu, C. Yi, H. C. Mi, S. L. Zhang, X. Z. Fu, J. L. Luo, S. Liu, Electrochem. Energy Rev., 2024, 7, 14.
[14]	A. B. Georgescu, A.J. Millis, Commun. Phys., 2022, 5, 135.
[15]	Z. Zhu, X. Yao, S. Zhao, X. Lin, W. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 4541-4549.
[16]	S. Behara, T. Thomas, Materialia, 2020, 13, 100819.
[17]	Z. Wu, M. Fan, H. Jiang, J. Dai, K. Liu, R. Hu, S. Qin, W. Xu, Y. Yao, J. Wan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202413932.
[18]	W. Zuo, X. Liu, J. Qiu, D. Zhang, Z. Xiao, J. Xie, F. Ren, J. Wang, Y. Li, G. F. Ortiz, W. Wen, S. Wu, M. S. Wang, R. Fu, Y. Yang, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 4903.
[19]	A. A. Bayode, O. T. Ore, E. A. Nnamani, B. Sotunde, D. T. Koko, E. I. Unuabonah, B. Helmreich, M. O. Omorogie, ACS Omega, 2024, 9, 19770-19785.
[20]	Y. Shuang, Q. Chen, M. Kim, Y. Wang, Y. Saito, S. Hatayama, P. Fons, D. Ando, M. Kubo, Y. Sutou, Adv. Mater., 2023, 35, 2303646.
[21]	S. Tao, J. T. S. Irvine, Chem. Mater, 2006, 18, 5453-5460.
[22]	Y.-H. Sun, C.-Y. Mu, W.-G. Jiang, L. Zhou, R.-M. Wang, Acta Phys. Sin., 2022, 71, 06680.
[23]	S. Vyazovkin, Polymers, 2020, 12, 1070.
[24]	J. Kohout, Molecules, 2021, 26, 7162.
[25]	R. Hu, L. Wei, J. Xian, G. Fang, Z. Wu, M. Fan, J. Guo, Q. Li, K. Liu, H. Jiang, W. Xu, J. Wan, Y. Yao, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2023, 39, 221202.
[26]	T. Tang, Z. Wang, J. Guan, Exploration, 2023, 3, 20230011.
[27]	W. Sun, H. Li, Y. Wang, Rep. Electrochem., 2015, 5, 1-9.
[28]	J. Wan, Z. Wu, G. Fang, J. Xian, J. Dai, J. Guo, Q. Li, Y. You, K. Liu, H. Yu, W. Xu, H. Jiang, M. Xia, H. Jin, J. Energy Chem., 2024, 91, 226-235.
[29]	J. Wan, G. Fang, S. Mi, H. Yu, J. Xian, M. Fan, Z. Wu, L. Wei, X. Ma, J. Cai, Y. You, D.-W. Wang, W. Xu, H. Jiang, H. Jin, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 488, 150912.
[30]	Y. Zang, Q. Wu, S. Wang, B. Huang, Y. Dai, T. Heine, Y. Ma, Adv. Energy Mater., 2023, 14, 2303953.
[31]	G. C. Moore, M. K. Horton, E. Linscott, A. M. Ganose, M. Siron, D. D. O'Regan, K. A. Persson, Phys. Rev. Mater., 2024, 8, 014409.
[32]	M. Capdevila-Cortada, Z. Łodziana, N. López, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 8370-8379.
[33]	Y. Zhong, Q. Zhang, S. Lan, H. Feng, Y. Zhao, Q. Li, X. Li, T. Huang, Adv. Sci., 2024, 11, 2405686.
[34]	M. Fan, H. Tian, Z. Wu, J. Dai, X. Ma, Y. You, J. Huang, Y. Feng, W. Ding, H. Jiang, W. Xu, H. Jin, J. Wan, SusMat, 2024, DOI:10.1002/sus2.252
[35]	C. Ge, L. Wang, G. Liu, R. Wu, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 775, 647-656.
[36]	X. Chia, M. Pumera, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 909-921.
[37]	A. Raveendran, M. Chandran, R. Dhanusuraman, RSC Adv., 2023, 13, 3843-3876.
[38]	O. van der Heijden, S. Park, R. E. Vos, J. J. J. Eggebeen, M. T. M. Koper, ACS Energy Lett., 2024, 9, 1871-1879.
[39]	F. Dong, L. Li, Z. Kong, X. Xu, Y. Zhang, Z. Gao, B. Dongyang, M. Ni, Q. Liu, Z. Lin, Small, 2020, 17, 2006638.
[40]	Z. Wu, J. Xian, J. Dai, G. Fang, M. Fan, H. Tian, J. Guo, Z. Huang, H. Jiang, W. Xu, J. Wan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2024, 12, 7047-7057.
[41]	S. Duran, M. Elmaalouf, M. Odziomek, J.-Y. Piquemal, M. Faustini, M. Giraud, J. Peron, C. Tard, ChemElectroChem, 2021, 8, 3519-3524.
[42]	L. Lu, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, F. Feng, K. Teng, S. Zhang, J. Zhuang, Q. An, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 1316-1323.
[43]	P. Leuaa, D. Priyadarshani, D. Choudhury, R. Maurya, M. Neergat, RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 30887-30895.
[44]	X. Yu, Y. Li, C. Pei, Y. Lu, J. K. Kim, H. S. Park, H. Pang, Adv. Sci., 2024, 11, 2310013.
[45]	L. Zhang, H. Zhu, J. Hao, C. Wang, Y. Wen, H. Li, S. Lu, F. Duan, M. Du, Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 327, 135033.
[46]	H. Wang, T. Zhai, Y. Wu, T. Zhou, B. Zhou, C. Shang, Z. Guo, Adv. Sci., 2023, 10, 2301706.
[47]	S. Li, Y. Liu, K. Feng, C. Li, J. Xu, C. Lu, H. Lin, Y. Feng, D. Ma, J. Zhong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202308670.
[48]	J. Xian, H. Jiang, Z. Wu, H. Yu, K. Liu, M. Fan, R. Hu, G. Fang, L. Wei, J. Cai, W. Xu, H. Jin, J. Wan, J. Energy Chem., 2024, 88, 232-241.
[49]	Y. Tong, J. Wu, P. Chen, H. Liu, W. Chu, C. Wu, Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 11165-11169.
[50]	J. Suntivich, H. A. Gasteiger, N. Yabuuchi, H. Nakanishi, J. B. Goodenough, Y. Shao-Horn, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 546-550.
[51]	J. Tang, C. Su, Z. Shao, Exploration, 2024, 4, 20220112.
[52]	L. Tang, T. Fan, Z. Chen, J. Tian, H. Guo, M. Peng, F. Zuo, X. Fu, M. Li, Y. Bu, Y. Luo, J. Li, Y. Sun, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 417, 129324.
[53]	K. Xiao, Y. Wang, P. Wu, L. Hou, Z. Q. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202301408.
[54]	S. Jiao, X. Fu, H. Huang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 32, 2107651.
[55]	J. Li, Nano-Micro Lett., 2022, 14, 112.
[56]	J. Liu, H. Liu, H. Chen, X. Du, B. Zhang, Z. Hong, S. Sun, W. Wang, Adv. Sci., 2020, 7, 1901614.
[57]	A. Khorshidi, J. Violet, J. Hashemi, A. A. Peterson, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 263-268.

非常规亚稳态立方相二维LaMnO₃用于高效碱性海水析氧反应

Unconventional metastable cubic 2D LaMnO₃ for efficient alkaline seawater oxygen evolution

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘炎昌, 田新龙, 韩业创, 陈亚楠, 胡文彬. 高温热冲击制备用于催化反应的高熵合金纳米颗粒[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 66-89.
[2]	杜乘风, 胡尔海, 余泓, 颜清宇. 二维电催化剂的局域电子调控策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 1-14.
[3]	孙晓旭, 朱晓蓉, 王彧, 李亚飞. 1T′-MoTe₂单层: 一种有前景的电催化合成双氧水的催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(6): 1520-1526.
[4]	成金玲, 王定胜. 二维水滑石复合材料用于电解水的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(6): 1380-1398.
[5]	张丹, 苗红福, 吴雪珂, 王作超, 赵欢, 石月, 陈希磊, 肖振宇, 赖建平, 王磊. 可规模化合成的Ru₂P@Ru/CNT用于高效海水裂解[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1148-1155.
[6]	唐甜蜜, 王振旅, 管景奇. 缺陷位工程在二维材料电催化析氢反应中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(3): 636-678.
[7]	黄斌, 吴亦凡, 陈碧波, 钱勇, 周耐根, 李能. 过渡金属原子对掺杂g-CN单层作为高效氮电催化剂性能[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(7): 1160-1167.
[8]	李赛赛, 孙见蕊, 管景奇. 提升二维材料的电催化析氢和光催化析氢性能的策略[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(4): 511-556.
[9]	丁钰, 苗博强, 赵越, 李富民, 蒋育澄, 李淑妮, 陈煜. 多孔Fe₃O₄修饰的Ni(OH)₂纳米片的制备及其析氧性能研究[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(2): 271-278.
[10]	杨秋实, 胡少年, 姚雅萱, 林先刚, 杜海威, 袁玉鹏. 增大石墨相氮化碳层间距提升光催化制氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(1): 217-224.
[11]	古文泉, 王万军, 李桂英, 谢皓晶, 王保强, 安太成. 微波辅助合成缺陷型氧化钨及其光催化杀菌机理:氧空位的作用[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(10): 1488-1497.
[12]	闻洁雅, 凌丽丽, 陈瑶, 卞振锋. Pd/PbTiO₃表面的热电效应增强光催化Suzuki偶联反应[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(10): 1674-1681.
[13]	苏岳檀, 李文浪, 李桂英, 敖志敏, 安太成. Al修饰C₂N对甲醛降解的吸附增强机理及潜在催化活性的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(5): 664-672.
[14]	Seol-Hee Kim, Robin Babu, Dong-Woo Kim, Wonjoo Lee, Dae-Won Park. 采用金属有机骨架材料M(HBTC)(4,4'-bipy)·3DMF(M=Ni,Co,Zn)催化CO₂与环氧丙烷的环加成反应[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(8): 1311-1319.
[15]	缪应纯, 廉志超, 霍宇凝, 李和兴. 微波辅助离子热合成具有高光催化活性的BiOBr片层微米立方体[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(8): 1411-1417.