光催化与生物降解协同系统在环境修复中的应用: 综述

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64807-8

催化学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 78: 47-74.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64807-8

光催化与生物降解协同系统在环境修复中的应用: 综述

曹瑞麟^a, 潘园^a, 张贤胜^a, 黄馨怡^a, 李腾^a, 刘晟^a, 王云泽^a, 唐山青^a, 邵彬彬^b^,^*(), 刘智峰^a^,^*()

^a湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 湖南大学环境生物与污染控制教育部重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410082
^b湖南大学设计学院, 湖南长沙 410082

收稿日期:2025-05-06 接受日期:2025-07-16 出版日期:2025-11-18 发布日期:2025-10-14
通讯作者: *电子信箱: shaobb@hnu.edu.cn (邵彬彬), zhifengliu@hnu.edu.cn (刘智峰).
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52100181);湖南省自然科学基金(2022JJ10011);中央高校基本研究经费(531118010885);湖南省自然科学基金(2025JJ50218)

The application of photocatalysis and biodegradation synergistic systems in environmental remediation: A review

Ruilin Cao^a, Yuan Pan^a, Xiansheng Zhang^a, Xinyi Huang^a, Teng Li^a, Sheng Liu^a, Yunze Wang^a, Shanqing Tang^a, Binbin Shao^b^,^*(), Zhifeng Liu^a^,^*()

^aHunan University and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China
^bSchool of Design, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China

Received:2025-05-06 Accepted:2025-07-16 Online:2025-11-18 Published:2025-10-14
Contact: *E-mail: shaobb@hnu.edu.cn (B. Shao), zhifengliu@hnu.edu.cn (Z. Liu).
About author:Binbin Shao (School of Design, Hunan University) received his B.A. degree from Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (China) in 2015, and Ph.D. degree from College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University in 2020. He carried out postdoctoral research at College of Environmental Science and Engineering in Hunan University (China) from 2020 to 2023. Since the end of 2023, he has been working in School of Design, Hunan University. His research interests currently focus on wastewater treatment, advanced oxidation processes, solid waste treatment and resource utilization, life-cycle assessment, sustainable agriculture, sustainable design, etc. He has coauthored more than 70 peer-reviewed papers, with the total citations of these papers exceeding 8000 times, and his H-index is 52. He was invited as a Young Editorial Board Member of Eco-Environment & Health and Carbon Neutralization. He has been included in the list of World’s Top 2% Scientists from 2021-2024.
Zhifeng Liu (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University) received his Ph.D. degree from Hunan University in 2012. He is a specially-appointed professor of "Yuelu Scholar" at Hunan University, a doctoral supervisor, and an Elsevier Highly Cited Researcher. He mainly engages in research on soil and water environment management and ecological restoration, solid waste treatment and resource recovery. He has presided over more than 50 projects, published more than 140 papers, including more than 10 ESI hot papers and over 30 ESI highly cited papers, with his papers being cited more than 12000 times. He has applied for/been granted more than 80 international and domestic patents, with several achievements transferred to enterprises or put into practical application.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52100181);Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2022JJ10011);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(531118010885);Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2025JJ50218)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着工业化进程的加速及环境污染问题的日益严峻, 传统单一处理技术(如吸附、膜分离、生物降解等)在应对高毒性、难降解的新兴污染物(如抗生素、多环芳烃等)时, 显现出明显局限性. 光催化技术虽能利用太阳能实现污染物矿化, 但单一光催化过程中存在快速且不受控的化学反应, 常导致有害副产物积累和过度氧化残留物的产生. 此外, 仅依赖生物降解也难以有效降解高浓度、结构复杂的新兴污染物. 因此, 光催化与生物降解的协同技术(光催化与生物降解耦合(ICPB)系统、光催化微生物燃料电池(PMFCs))应运而生. 这类技术通过整合两者的优势, 突破单一技术的性能瓶颈, 提供了经济高效、环境友好且可持续的解决方案, 成为环境修复领域的研究热点.

本文系统地介绍了ICPB系统与PMFCs系统的研究进展. 首先概述了ICPB系统通过多孔载体实现光催化剂与微生物的协同作用: 光催化剂在光照下产生的活性氧物种(ROS)可将难降解污染物转化为中间产物, 或直接氧化为CO₂和H₂O; 生物膜则进一步将中间产物矿化为CO₂和H₂O, 即解决了光催化副产物积累与生物降解效率低的问题, 也提高了污染物去除效率. 该系统通过载体保护生物膜免受光催化氧化损伤, 同时利用微生物代谢产物促进光催化反应的持续进行. PMFCs系统则进一步将光催化与电化学过程结合, 实现能源回收与环境治理的双重功能. 该系统通过光生电子的定向传递与微生物代谢的协同作用, 显著提升了污染物的降解速率与能量转化效率. 随后, 针对系统优化, 研究重点围绕PMFCs的类型、ICPB载体的选择、光催化剂优化及微生物群落调控展开. 文中详细介绍了PMFCs系统的四个类型(生物阳极-光阴极、光阳极-生物阴极、ICPB阳极-阴极、光阳极-生物阳极-阴极)及其应用. 探讨了ICPB系统中常用载体(聚氨酯海绵)与生物相容性高的载体(生物质材料)等的实际应用. 概括了光催化剂的优化策略, 主要包含: (1)元素掺杂, 调整光催化剂的电子特性, 实现带隙缩小、光捕获增强和氧化还原电位调制; (2)半导体复合, 通过促进定向载流子转移来提高电荷分离和量子效率. 异质结的构建, 增强可见光吸收并促进有效的电子-空穴对分离; (3)表面修饰, 通过引入官能团、纳米颗粒或化学键来优化光吸收、电荷传输、活性位点密度和稳定性. 微生物群落的调控则通过驯化富集菌群或构建人工合成菌群, 提升污染物降解效率. 其后, 概述了ICPB系统与PMFCs在污染物去除方面的实际应用. 最后总结了光催化与生物降解协同技术所面临的挑战和未来的研究方向.

未来研究可以从以下方向突破: 加强跨学科合作, 开发低成本、长寿命的光催化材料, 探索新型反应器设计, 深化对光催化-生物协同机制的理解, 并借助人工智能与大数据技术优化工艺参数. 例如, 通过机器学习预测污染物降解路径, 动态调控光催化-生物协同过程; 开发兼具光催化活性与导电性的三维多孔载体, 提升传质效率与微生物附着能力等. 希望本文能够为构建高效实用的光催化-生物降解协同体系提供借鉴.

关键词: 光催化, 生物降解, 光催化-生物降解耦合系统, 光催化微生物燃料电池, 污水处理

Abstract:

The growing presence of emerging pollutants in the environment has led to a focus on developing new treatment technologies to address the limitations of traditional methods. Recent advancements in combining photocatalysis with biodegradation for pollutant treatment have garnered significant attention. This is due to the rapid and uncontrolled chemical reactions in single photocatalytic processes, which often result in the buildup of harmful by-products and over-oxidation residues. Additionally, relying solely on biodegradation is challenging for breaking down emerging pollutants that possess high concentrations and intricate structures. Therefore, the intimately coupled photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB) systems, along with the photocatalytic microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), as a new approach to treat pollutants. These systems combine the benefits of biodegradation and photocatalytic reactions, providing cost-effective, eco-friendly, and sustainable solutions with significant promise. In order to demonstrate the ICPB system and the PMFCs system as rational options for pollutant removal, the mechanisms of pollutant degradation by the two systems have been analyzed in depth, and recent advances in photocatalysts, biofilms, and carriers/configurations in the two systems have been summarized. Furthermore, the practical applications of the ICPB system versus the PMFCs system for pollutant removal are also summarized and highlighted. This review further points out the current limitations, such as photocatalytic materials that are still challenging in terms of commercial viability for practical applications, and looks forward to the prospects of the ICPB system versus the PMFCs system for the treatment of pollutants to promote practical applications.

Key words: Photocatalysis, Biodegradation, Intimately coupled photocatalysis and biodegradation system, Photocatalytic microbial fuel cells, Wastewater purification

曹瑞麟, 潘园, 张贤胜, 黄馨怡, 李腾, 刘晟, 王云泽, 唐山青, 邵彬彬, 刘智峰. 光催化与生物降解协同系统在环境修复中的应用: 综述[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 78: 47-74.

Ruilin Cao, Yuan Pan, Xiansheng Zhang, Xinyi Huang, Teng Li, Sheng Liu, Yunze Wang, Shanqing Tang, Binbin Shao, Zhifeng Liu. The application of photocatalysis and biodegradation synergistic systems in environmental remediation: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 78: 47-74.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64807-8

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2025/V78/I11/47

图/表 23

参考文献

[1]	Z. Liu, M. He, L. Tang, B. Shao, Q. Liang, T. Wu, Y. Pan, X. Zhang, S. Luo, Q. He, L. Ge, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 634, 255-267.
[2]	L. Huang, S. Cheng, G. Chen, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2011, 86, 481-491.
[3]	T. Wu, Z. Chen, Z. Liu, S. Yang, Y. Liu, B. Shao, Y. Yan, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 504, 158895.
[4]	S. Roccuzzo, A. P. Beckerman, J. Trögl, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2021, 18, 89-106.
[5]	R. Rafieenia, M. Sulonen, M. Mahmoud, F. El-Gohary, C. A. Rossa, Sci. Total Environ., 2022, 824, 153923.
[6]	S. Zheng, Y. Wang, C. Chen, X. Zhou, Y. Liu, J. Yang, Q. Geng, G. Chen, Y. Ding, F. Yang, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, 19, 10919.
[7]	C. Liang, D. Wei, S. Zhang, Q. Ren, J. Shi, L. Liu, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2021, 210, 111885.
[8]	R. Zhang, Y. Yang, C.-H. Huang, L. Zhao, P. Sun, Water Res., 2016, 103, 283-292.
[9]	K. Hu, W. Tian, Y. Yang, G. Nie, P. Zhou, Y. Wang, X. Duan, S. Wang, Water Res., 2021, 198, 117144.
[10]	J. Sun, T. Wu, Z. Liu, B. Shao, Q. Liang, Q. He, S. Luo, Y. Pan, C. Zhao, D. Huang, J. Cleaner Prod., 2022, 346, 131143.
[11]	X. Zhang, Z. Liu, B. Shao, T. Wu, Y. Pan, S. Luo, M. He, L. Ge, J. Sun, C. Cheng, J. Huang, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2023, 30, 67647-67661.
[12]	T. Wu, Z. Liu, B. Shao, Q. He, Y. Pan, X. Zhang, J. Sun, M. He, L. Ge, C. Cheng, T. Hu, Nano Energy, 2024, 120, 109137.
[13]	T. Wu, Z. Liu, B. Shao, Q. Liang, Q. He, Y. Pan, X. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Sun, S. Gong, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 447, 137332.
[14]	J. Chen, S.-S. Liu, L.-X. He, Y.-X. Cheng, P. Ye, J. Li, G.-G. Ying, Y.-J. Wang, F. Yang, Water Res., 2021, 198, 117145.
[15]	S. Zafar, D. A. Bukhari, A. Rehman, Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 2022, 29, 103437.
[16]	A. Foscari, B. Seiwert, D. Zahn, M. Schmidt, T. Reemtsma, Water Res., 2024, 253, 121322.
[17]	X. Zhang, Y. Pan, Y. Wang, T. Wu, B. Shao, Q. He, L. Zhou, T. Li, S. Liu, X. Huang, Z. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 481, 148646.
[18]	G. Ramalingam, N. Perumal, A. K. Priya, S. Rajendran, Chemosphere, 2022, 300, 134391.
[19]	Q. Liang, X. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, L. Tang, B. Shao, W. Zhang, S. Gong, M. Cheng, Q. He, C. Feng, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 401, 123355.
[20]	Y. Dong, D. Xu, J. Zhang, Q. Wang, S. Pang, G. Zhang, L. C. Campos, L. Lv, X. Liu, W. Gao, L. Sun, Z. Ren, P. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2023, 445, 130364.
[21]	C. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Shen, D. Shuai, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 403, 126365.
[22]	A. Punetha, S. Saraswat, J. P. N. Rai, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2022, 38, 61.
[23]	A. Saravanan, P. S. Kumar, D. N. Vo, S. Jeevanantham, S. Karishma, P. R. Yaashikaa, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 419, 126451.
[24]	H. Zhang, Y. Lu, Y. Li, C. Wang, Y. Yu, W. Zhang, L. Wang, L. Niu, C. Zhang, Chemosphere, 2022, 287, 132196.
[25]	L. Xia, M. Chen, G. Li, T. An, Water Res., 2024, 262, 122137.
[26]	C. Adán, A. Magnet, S. Fenoy, C. Pablos, C. del Águila, J. Marugán, Water Res., 2018, 144, 512-521.
[27]	J. Qi, H. Lan, R. Liu, H. Liu, J. Qu, Water Res., 2020, 171, 115448.
[28]	T. R. Waghmode, M. B. Kurade, R. T. Sapkal, C. H. Bhosale, B.-H. Jeon, S. P. Govindwar, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 371, 115-122.
[29]	Z. Lu, Y. Xu, M. Z. Akbari, C. Liang, L. Peng, Chemosphere, 2022, 295, 133952.
[30]	X. Hu, Y. Pan, S. Zhao, F. Zhang, F. Li, Z. Li, H. Li, Y. Li, J. Lu, X. Yang, M. Bao, J. Environ. Manag., 2023, 342, 118357.
[31]	M. D. Marsolek, C. I. Torres, M. Hausner, B. E. Rittmann, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2008, 101, 83-92.
[32]	H. Cai, L. Sun, Y. Wang, T. Song, M. Bao, X. Yang, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 369, 1078-1092.
[33]	K. Liu, J. Chen, F. Sun, Y. Liu, M. Tang, Y. Yang, Sci. Total Environ., 2022, 835, 155482.
[34]	S. Dong, S. Dong, X. Tian, Z. Xu, D. Ma, B. Cui, N. Ren, B. E. Rittmann, J. Hazard. Mater., 2016, 302, 386-394.
[35]	W. Zuo, L. Zhang, Z. Zhang, S. Tang, Y. Sun, H. Huang, Y. Yu, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2021, 41, 273-299.
[36]	Z. Zhou, C. Jiao, Y. Liang, A. Du, J. Zhang, J. Xiong, G. Chen, H. Zhu, L. Lu, Polymers, 2022, 14, 4774.
[37]	N. Zhong, J. Yuan, Y. Luo, M. Zhao, B. Luo, Q. Liao, H. Chang, D. Zhong, B. E. Rittmann, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 425, 130666.
[38]	L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. Xiao, J. Shi, X. Du, L. Wang, X. Wu, New J. Chem., 2021, 45, 13029-13039.
[39]	P. Yang, Y. Ye, Z. Yan, Q. Li, K. Zhang, Y. Yang, Q. Zhang, H. Yin, D. Xia, F. Pan, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 2823-2827.
[40]	Y. Xu, N. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Chang, D. Wang, J. Xia, Energy Rep., 2023, 9, 206-218.
[41]	B. Zhao, G. Yang, Z. Xie, N. Zhang, J. Xia, X. Liu, D. Wang, P. Wang, L. Tang, J. Environ. Manag., 2024, 360, 121159.
[42]	Q. Si, X. Feng, Y. Teng, H. Shi, J. Kuang, Z. Xiao, W. Wang, C. Jiang, W. Guo, N. Ren, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 365, 124909.
[43]	M. Sarkar, J. Hazard. Mater. Adv., 2023, 10, 100281.
[44]	E. Antolini, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 103241.
[45]	C. Wang, Y. Xing, K. Zhang, H. Zheng, Y.-N. Zhang, X. Zhu, X. Yuan, J. Qu, J. Power Sources, 2023, 559, 232625.
[46]	Y. Hou, G. Yuan, S. Wang, Z. Yu, S. Qin, L. Tu, Y. Yan, X. Chen, H. Zhu, Y. Tang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 384, 121438.
[47]	B. E. Logan, B. Hamelers, R. Rozendal, U. Schröder, J. Keller, S. Freguia, P. Aelterman, W. Verstraete, K. Rabaey, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40, 5181-5192.
[48]	A. J. Slate, K. A. Whitehead, D. A. C. Brownson, C. E. Banks, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2019, 101, 60-81.
[49]	Y. Dai, Y. Guo, J. Wang, Y. Li, L. Zhang, X. Liu, Chemosphere, 2021, 285, 131530.
[50]	Z. S. Yuan, J. X. Zou, X. L. Zhao, J. Y. Shi, C. S. Guo, M. Yan, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2023, 166, 86-97.
[51]	L. Wang, L. Liu, F. Yang, Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 270, 554-561.
[52]	R. He, L. Liu, P. Shi, C. Nie, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2018, 93, 3336-3346.
[53]	Y. Vasseghian, A. Khataee, E.-N. Dragoi, M. Moradi, S. Nabavifard, G. Oliveri Conti, A. Mousavi Khaneghah, Arab. J. Chem., 2020, 13, 8458-8480.
[54]	P. Mishra, P. Saravanan, G. Packirisamy, M. Jang, C. Wang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46, 22877-22906.
[55]	Y. Deng, L. Tang, C. Feng, G. Zeng, J. Wang, Y. Lu, Y. Liu, J. Yu, S. Chen, Y. Zhou, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 42816-42828.
[56]	L. Tang, C. Feng, Y. Deng, G. Zeng, J. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Feng, J. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 230, 102-114.
[57]	J. Wang, L. Tang, G. Zeng, Y. Deng, Y. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Zhou, Z. Guo, J. Wang, C. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 209, 285-294.
[58]	Y. Yu, S. Wang, J. Teng, A. Zupanic, S. Guo, X. Tang, H. Liang, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2022, 9, 815181.
[59]	M. Yu, J. Wang, L. Tang, C. Feng, H. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Peng, Z. Chen, Q. Xie, Water Res., 2020, 175, 115673.
[60]	K. K. Sakimoto, A. B. Wong, P. Yang, Science, 2016, 351, 74-77.
[61]	Q. Yang, X. Bao, Z. Li, A. Yang, Y. Cao, X. Hu, L. Yu, B. Liu, J. Water Process. Eng., 2022, 45, 102454.
[62]	L. Koók, E. D. Quéméner, P. Bakonyi, J. Zitka, E. Trably, G. Tóth, L. Pavlovec, Z. Pientka, N. Bernet, K. Bélafi-Bakó, N. Nemestóthy, Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 278, 279-286.
[63]	Y. Tong, J. Wei, R. Mo, H. Ma, F. Ai, Front. Chem., 2022, 10, 953434.
[64]	G. Lui, G. Jiang, M. Fowler, A. Yu, Z. Chen, J. Power Sources, 2019, 425, 69-75.
[65]	Y. Wang, Z. Lin, X. Su, P. Zhao, J. Zhou, Q. He, H. Ai, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 372, 956-965.
[66]	J. Cao, Y. Shi, J. Xin, S. Kong, X. Wang, Biochem. Eng. J., 2023, 198, 109034.
[67]	J. Xiong, Y. Liang, H. Cheng, S. Guo, C. Jiao, H. Zhu, S. Wang, J. Liang, Q. Yang, G. Chen, Materials, 2020, 13, 1645.
[68]	M. Zhang, W. Jiang, D. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 183, 263-268.
[69]	O. Guselnikova, A. Barras, A. Addad, E. Sviridova, S. Szunerits, P. Postnikov, R. Boukherroub, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, 240, 116627.
[70]	G. Li, S. Park, B. E. Rittmann, Water Res., 2012, 46, 6489-6496.
[71]	D. Zhou, Z. Xu, S. Dong, M. Huo, S. Dong, X. Tian, B. Cui, H. Xiong, T. Li, D. Ma, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 7776-7783.
[72]	Y. Liang, T. Zhao, B. Xiao, J. Xiong, S. Wang, H. Zhu, G. Chen, H. Song, S. Huang, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2022, 97, 2547-2556.
[73]	K. Liu, Y. Yang, F. Sun, Y. Liu, M. Tang, J. Chen, Chemosphere, 2022, 299, 134417.
[74]	Y. Liang, C. Jiao, L. Pan, T. Zhao, J. Liang, J. Xiong, S. Wang, H. Zhu, G. Chen, L. Lu, H. Song, Q. Yang, Q. Zhou, Environ. Res., 2021, 195, 110840.
[75]	R. Ding, W. Yan, Y. Wu, Y. Xiao, H. Gang, S. Wang, L. Chen, F. Zhao, Water Res., 2018, 143, 589-598.
[76]	D. Ma, D. Zou, D. Zhou, T. Li, S. Dong, Z. Xu, and S. Dong, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2015, 104, 178-185.
[77]	F. Li, X. Lan, J. Shi, L. Wang, J. Water Process. Eng., 2021, 40, 101965.
[78]	C. Wang, Y. Li, H. Tan, A. Zhang, Y. Xie, B. Wu, H. Xu, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 359, 1065-1074.
[79]	H. T. T. Dang, C. V. Dinh, K. M. Nguyen, N. T. H. Tran, T. T. Pham, R. M. Narbaitz, Sustainability, 2020, 12, 4758.
[80]	J. Xiong, S. Guo, T. Zhao, Y. Liang, J. Liang, S. Wang, H. Zhu, L. Zhang, J. R. Zhao, G. Chen, Cellulose, 2020, 27, 3391-3404.
[81]	Y. Zhang, X. Pu, M. Fang, J. Zhu, L. Chen, B. E. Rittmann, Biodegradation, 2012, 23, 575-583.
[82]	D. Wen, G. Li, R. Xing, S. Park, B. E. Rittmann, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2012, 95, 263-272.
[83]	Z. Xing, W. Zhou, F. Du, Y. Qu, G. Tian, K. Pan, C. Tian, H. Fu, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 790-798.
[84]	L. Zhang, Z. Xing, H. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Wu, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 180, 521-529.
[85]	Y. Hou, Y. Gan, Z. Yu, X. Chen, L. Qian, B. Zhang, L. Huang, J. Huang, J. Power Sources, 2017, 371, 26-34.
[86]	T. Ahmadpour, S. Aber, M. Ghasem Hosseini, Bioelectrochemistry, 2022, 146, 108139.
[87]	N. Touach, A. Benzaouak, J. Toyir, Y. El Hamdouni, M. El Mahi, E. M. Lotfi, N. Labjar, M. Kacimi, L. F. Liotta, Molecules, 2023, 28, 1894.
[88]	L. Tu, Y. Hou, G. Yuan, Z. Yu, S. Qin, Y. Yan, H. Zhu, H. Lin, Y. Chen, S. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 389, 121917.
[89]	S. Su, Y. Zhang, W. Hu, X. Zhang, D. Ju, C. Jia, J. Liu, Bioelectrochemistry, 2020, 132, 107439.
[90]	Y. Du, Y. Feng, Y. Qu, J. Liu, N. Ren, H. Liu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48, 7634-7641.
[91]	X. Long, H. Wang, C. Wang, X. Li, Environ. Technol., 2020, 41, 3420-3430.
[92]	D. Zhou, S. Dong, J. Shi, X. Cui, D. Ki, C. I. Torres, B. E. Rittmann, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 317, 882-889.
[93]	F. Fischer, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2018, 90, 16-27.
[94]	D. Zhou, S. Dong, D. Ki, B. E. Rittmann, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 338, 745-751.
[95]	X. Wang, J. Hu, Q. Chen, P. Zhang, L. Wu, J. Li, B. Liu, K. Xiao, S. Liang, L. Huang, H. Hou, J. Yang, Water Res., 2019, 156, 125-135.
[96]	J. Guan, X. Cao, Y. Yuan, C. Wang, R. An, P. Lu, N. Lu, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 471, 144308.
[97]	P. Si, Y. Feng, X. Wang, X. Yue, D. Li, S. Zhang, B. Liang, Y. Gao, A. Zhou, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2023, 11, 109707.
[98]	Q. Wang, Z. Cai, L. Huang, Y. Pan, X. Quan, G. Li Puma, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 376, 119566.
[99]	Q. Zhu, X. Wang, J. Hu, S. Chen, S. Hu, Y. Wu, B. Liu, K. Xiao, S. Liang, J. Yang, H. Hou, Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 340, 125717.
[100]	J. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Chu, R. Chen, C. Zhang, S. Toan, D. M. Bagley, J. Sun, S. Dong, M. Fan, J. Power Sources, 2021, 481, 229133.
[101]	S. Zhang, Y. Feng, B. Liang, P. Si, D. Li, Y. Gao, A. Zhou, X. Yue, J. Water Process. Eng., 2023, 54, 103926.
[102]	E. F. Talooki, M. Ghorbani, M. Rahimnejad, M. S. Lashkenari, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2020, 873, 114469.
[103]	Y. Shi, S. Zhang, W. Li, S. Kong, J. Xin, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Alloys Compd., 2023, 942, 168993.
[104]	S. M. Sathe, M. M. Doki, S. Mandal, R. Ananthakrishnan, B. K. Dubey, M. M. Ghangrekar, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28849-3.
[105]	T. Yu, Q. Liu, G. Chen, L. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Gao, T. Yang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47, 3781-3790.
[106]	C. Wang, Y. Xing, X. Zhu, X. Yuan, J. Qu, H. Zheng, D. Jin, J. Power Sources, 2022, 543, 231830.
[107]	C. Wang, G. Wu, X. Zhu, Y. Xing, X. Yuan, J. Qu, Chemosphere, 2022, 293, 133517.
[108]	S.-M. Lam, J.-C. Sin, H. Zeng, H. Lin, H. Li, A. R. Mohamed, J. W. Lim, Chemosphere, 2022, 287, 132384.
[109]	X. Hu, J. Qin, Y. Wang, J. Wang, A. Yang, Y. F. Tsang, B. Liu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 628, 327-337.
[110]	P. Xu, D. Zheng, Z. Xie, Q. He, J. Yu, J. Cleaner Prod., 2020, 265, 121872.
[111]	P. Xu, D. Zheng, Q. He, J. Yu, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, 250, 117106.
[112]	Q. Chen, L. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Zhang, Chemosphere, 2020, 255, 126930.
[113]	Y. Li, J. Sun, L. Liu, F. Yang, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2017, 4, 335-345.
[114]	T. Ahmadpour, S. Aber, M. G. Hosseini, J. Power Sources, 2020, 474, 228589.
[115]	J. Wang, W. Shi, D. Liu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, D. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 202, 289-297.
[116]	B. Shao, Z. Liu, G. Zeng, Y. Liu, Q. Liang, Q. He, T. Wu, Y. Pan, J. Huang, Z. Peng, S. Luo, C. Liang, X. Liu, S. Tong, J. Liang, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 286, 119867.
[117]	T. Wu, Q. He, Z. Liu, B. Shao, Q. Liang, Y. Pan, J. Huang, Z. Peng, Y. Liu, C. Zhao, X. Yuan, L. Tang, S. Gong, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 424, 127177.
[118]	T. Wu, Q. Liang, L. Tang, J. Tang, J. Wang, B. Shao, S. Gong, Q. He, Y. Pan, Z. Liu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2023, 443, 130251.
[119]	Y. Yu, H. Huang, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 453, 139755.
[120]	Q. Liu, J. Hou, Y. Zeng, J. Wu, L. Miao, Z. Yang, Chemosphere, 2023, 328, 138507.
[121]	E. Kusmierek, Catalysts, 2020, 10, 439.
[122]	S. Dong, Y. Gong, Z. Zeng, S. Chen, J. Ye, Z. Wang, D. D. Dionysiou, Water Res., 2023, 242, 120297.
[123]	R. Cheng, J. Xia, J. Wen, P. Xu, X. Zheng, Nanomaterials, 2022, 12, 1335.
[124]	Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Zhao, Z. Huang, W. Chen, Y. Zhou, X. Lv, S. Yuan, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 248, 44-53.
[125]	H. Feng, C. Tang, Q. Wang, Y. Liang, D. Shen, K. Guo, Q. He, T. Jayaprada, Y. Zhou, T. Chen, X. Ying, M. Wang, Chemosphere, 2018, 196, 476-481.
[126]	A. Benzaouak, N.-E. Touach, V. M. Ortiz-Martínez, M. J. Salar-García, F. Hernández-Fernández, A. P. de los Ríos, M. El Mahi, E. M. Lotfi, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2018, 26, 1985-1991.
[127]	H.-X. Han, C. Shi, L. Yuan, G.-P. Sheng, Appl. Energy, 2017, 204, 382-389.
[128]	H. Xiong, D. Zou, D. Zhou, S. Dong, J. Wang, B. E. Rittmann, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 316, 7-14.
[129]	P. Feng, X. Tao, W. Li, Y. Chen, F. Tian, L. Zhu, X. Liu, Z. Wu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2024, 654, 159381.
[130]	G. D. Bhowmick, M. T. Noori, I. Das, B. Neethu, M. M. Ghangrekar, A. Mitra, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 7501-7510.
[131]	C. Yan, L. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 392, 123738.
[132]	Y. Liang, M. G. Abdoulaye, C. Zhou, B. Xiao, J. Zhang, J. Xiong, Q. Yang, J. R. Zhao, S. Wang, J. Cleaner Prod., 2023, 382, 135403.
[133]	Y. Jia, D. Zhang, H. You, W. Li, K. Jiang, J. Nanopart. Res., 2019, 21, 3.
[134]	Z. S. Wei, Y. M. He, Z. S. Huang, X. L. Xiao, B. L. Li, S. Ming, X. L. Cheng, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2019, 184, 109618.
[135]	Y. Liu, C. Tang, M. Cheng, M. Chen, S. Chen, L. Lei, Y. Chen, H. Yi, Y. Fu, L. Li, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 13374-13396.
[136]	Y. He, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, B. Teng, M. Fan, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 168-169, 1-8.
[137]	H.-X. Han, C. Shi, N. Zhang, L. Yuan, G.-P. Sheng, Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 639, 1512-1519.
[138]	R. Rajendran, S. Vignesh, S. Suganthi, V. Raj, G. Kavitha, B. Palanivel, M. Shkir, H. Algarni, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2022, 161, 110391.
[139]	Z. Liu, J. Huang, B. Shao, H. Zhong, Q. Liang, Q. He, T. Wu, Y. Pan, Z. Peng, X. Yuan, Y. Liu, C. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 426, 130767.
[140]	B. Shao, Z. Liu, L. Tang, Q. Liang, Q. He, T. Wu, Y. Pan, M. Cheng, Y. Liu, X. Tan, J. Tang, H. Wang, H. Feng, S. Tong, Chemosphere, 2022, 291, 133001.
[141]	T. Li, Y. Pan, B. Shao, X. Zhang, T. Wu, Q. He, M. He, L. Ge, L. Zhou, S. Liu, X. Zheng, J. Ye, Z. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33, 2304990.
[142]	H. Shi, X. Jiang, Y. Li, D. Chen, C. Hou, Z. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Shen, Sci. Total Environ., 2022, 807, 151006.
[143]	H. Zhang, Z. Liu, Y. Li, C. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Zhang, L. Wang, L. Niu, P. Wang, C. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 503, 144092.
[144]	S. Yan, Y. Shi, Y. Tao, H. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 359, 933-943.
[145]	Y. Xie, Y. Huang, Y. Zhang, T. Wu, S. Liu, M. Sun, B. Lee, Z. Lin, H. Chen, P. Dai, Z. Huang, J. Yang, C. Shi, D. Wu, L. Huang, Y. Hua, C. Wang, S. Sun, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 2883.
[146]	A. K. Ranade, A. Yamaguchi, M. Miyauchi, S. Ramaswami, C. Yoshimura, Water Res., 2025, 273, 123064.
[147]	Z. Qin, Z. Zhao, W. Jiao, Z. Han, L. Xia, Y. Fang, S. Wang, L. Ji, Y. Jiang, Bioresour. Technol., 2020, 301, 122736.
[148]	F. Li, X. Lan, L. Wang, X. Kong, P. Xu, Y. Tai, G. Liu, J. Shi, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 383, 123092.
[149]	S. Fu, X. Zhao, Z. Zhou, M. Li, L. Zhu, Water Res., 2021, 188, 116569.
[150]	Y. Li, L. Chen, X. Tian, L. Lin, R. Ding, W. Yan, F. Zhao, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 784, 147049.
[151]	J. Xiong, C. Jiao, L. Pan, J. Wang, H. Cheng, H. Zhu, H. Song, G. Chen, J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy, 2021, 15, 61-68.
[152]	Y. Liang, Q. Feng, J. Zhang, C. Jiao, J. Xiong, S. Wang, Q. Yang, J. Environ. Manag., 2022, 302, 114111.
[153]	K. Sathishkumar, V. R. Kannan, M. S. Alsalhi, A. Rajasekar, S. Devanesan, J. Narenkumar, W. Kim, X. Liu, Environ. Res., 2022, 214, 113824.
[154]	J. Wang, J. Xiong, Q. Feng, Z. Wan, Z. Zhou, B. Xiao, J. Zhang, O. Singdala, J. Environ. Manag., 2022, 318, 115595.
[155]	Y. Ye, P. Yang, Y. Deng, Y. Yang, K. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Shang, Q. Li, L. Sun, F. Pan, D. Xia, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 3127-3132.
[156]	Q. Liu, J. Hou, J. Wu, L. Miao, G. You, Y. Ao, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 423, 127063.
[157]	Y. Wang, X. Cai, Y. Chen, L. Zhang, L. Lin, X. Dai, Y. Jiang, H. Chen, J. Liao, Y. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2023, 127, 10114-10126.
[158]	Y. Wang, H. Qiu, H. Niu, H. Liu, J. Liu, Y. Jia, H. Ma, F. Xu, L. Hao, Z. Qiu, C. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2023, 449, 131018.
[159]	K. Sathishkumar, S. Naraginti, K. Lavanya, F. Zhang, R. Ayyamperumal, X. Liu, Environ. Res., 2023, 235, 116558.
[160]	S. Naraginti, K. Sathishkumar, K. Lavanya, F. Zhang, X. Liu, Chemosphere, 2023, 336, 139210.
[161]	Y. Lu, H. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Water Process. Eng., 2023, 56, 104285.
[162]	K. Liu, J. Chen, F. Sun, J. Yu, X. Zhang, Y. Xu, Y. Liu, M. Tang, Y. Yang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48, 22319-22333.
[163]	H. Zhang, Y. Yu, Y. Li, L. Lin, C. Zhang, W. Zhang, L. Wang, L. Niu, Chemosphere, 2023, 317, 137888.
[164]	B. Xue, L. Tian, Y. Liu, L. Peng, W. Iqbal, L. Li, Y. Mao, Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol., 2024, 21, 100390.
[165]	Y. Dong, Q. Wang, J. Zhu, L. Liang, D. Xu, X. Mi, Z. Ren, P. Wang, J. Environ. Manag., 2024, 352, 120044.
[166]	L. Qi, Y. Yang, Z. Yang, J. Qi, Y. Zhou, Z. Zhu, J. Li, Water Res., 2025, 268, 122581.
[167]	V. Catania, F. Lopresti, S. Cappello, R. Scaffaro, P. Quatrini, New Biotechnol., 2020, 58, 25-31.
[168]	M. Venkateswar Reddy, S. Venkata Mohan, Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 103, 313-321.
[169]	K. Naloka, J. Jaroonrunganan, N. Woratecha, N. Khondee, H. Nojiri, O. Pinyakong, Sci. Rep., 2022, 12, 10474.
[170]	K. Naloka, A. Kuntaveesuk, C. Muangchinda, S. Chavanich, V. Viyakarn, B. Chen, O. Pinyakong, Sci. Rep., 2024, 14, 11976.
[171]	Y. Huang, X. Hou, S. Liu, J. Ni, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 304, 864-872.
[172]	X. Peng, Z. Zhang, W. Luo, X. Jia, Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 128, 173-179.
[173]	S. Kasirajan, M. Ngouajio, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2013, 33, 443-443.
[174]	T. Fukushima, L.-M. Whang, P.-C. Chen, D. W. Putri, M.-Y. Chang, Y.-J. Wu, Y.-C. Lee, Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 141, 131-137.
[175]	X. Zhu, Y. Chen, X. Liu, D. Li, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 764, 144639.
[176]	A. Chen, W. Li, X. Zhang, C. Shang, S. Luo, R. Cao, D. Jin, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 417, 126017.
[177]	L. Hu, Y. Liu, G. Zeng, G. Chen, J. Wan, Y. Zeng, L. Wang, H. Wu, P. Xu, C. Zhang, M. Cheng, T. Hu, Chemosphere, 2017, 184, 1071-1079.
[178]	A. Caporusso, I. De Bari, V. Valerio, R. Albergo, F. Liuzzi, Ind. Crops Prod., 2021, 159, 113030.
[179]	L. Cui, H. Shen, P. Kang, X. Guo, H. Li, Y. Wang, J. Wan, C. Dagot, Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 341, 125839.
[180]	T. Sumpradit, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2009, 108, S79.
[181]	G. Bozkoyunlu, A. Karakaya, Y. Laleli, S. Takac, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2011, 22, S36.
[182]	D. V. Singh, R. Ahmad Bhat, A. K. Upadhyay, R. Singh, D. P. Singh, Environ. Technol. Innov., 2021, 21, 101340.
[183]	C. Li, Q. Tian, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Yang, H. Zheng, L. Chen, F. Li, Water Res., 2022, 210, 117985.
[184]	M. Salehi, D. Biria, M. Shariati, M. Farhadian, J. Environ. Manag., 2019, 243, 116-126.
[185]	S. Chen, M. Yuan, W. Feng, W. Liu, W. Zhang, H. Xu, X. Zheng, G. Shen, C. Guo, L. Wang, Water Res., 2020, 185, 116220.
[186]	F. Hu, J. Ye, J. Zhang, W. Zhang, P. Chen, Z. Yuan, Z. Xu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2024, 479, 135605.
[187]	H. Cai, Y. Niu, T. Guan, Y. Zhang, Z. Ma, J. Environ. Manag., 2024, 364, 121431.
[188]	L. Pan, Z. Wan, Q. Feng, J. Wang, J. Xiong, S. Wang, H. Zhu, G. Chen, J. Environ. Sci., 2022, 122, 50-61.
[189]	Y. Chen, J. Shen, L. Huang, Y. Pan, X. Quan, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41, 13368-13379.
[190]	Y. Du, Y. Feng, Y. Dong, Y. Qu, J. Liu, X. Zhou, N. Ren, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 34350-34355.
[191]	V. R. Nimje, C.-Y. Chen, H.-R. Chen, C.-C. Chen, Y. M. Huang, M.-J. Tseng, K.-C. Cheng, Y.-F. Chang, Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 104, 315-323.
[192]	G. Palanisamy, H.-Y. Jung, T. Sadhasivam, M. D. Kurkuri, S. C. Kim, S.-H. Roh, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 221, 598-621.
[193]	B. E. Rittmann, Water Res., 2018, 132, 135-145.
[194]	V. Fedorovich, M. C. Knighton, E. Pagaling, F. B. Ward, A. Free, I. Goryanin, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2009, 75, 7326-7334.
[195]	A. Kadier, M. S. Kalil, P. Abdeshahian, K. Chandrasekhar, A. Mohamed, N. F. Azman, W. Logroño, Y. Simayi, A. A. Hamid, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 61, 501-525.
[196]	M. Y. Kim, C. Kim, S. K. Ainala, H. Bae, B.-H. Jeon, S. Park, J. R. Kim, Bioelectrochemistry, 2019, 125, 1-7.
[197]	M. Sui, Y. Dong, Z. Wang, F. Wang, H. You, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2017, 348, 238-245.
[198]	H. Li, X. Zheng, H. Cao, L. Tan, B. Yang, W. Cheng, Y. Xu, Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 325, 124710.
[199]	Ö. Acer, G. P. Johnston, D. Lineman, C. G. Johnston, Environ. Earth Sci., 2021, 80, 773.
[200]	F. W. Larimer, P. Chain, L. Hauser, J. Lamerdin, S. Malfatti, L. Do, M. L. Land, D. A. Pelletier, J. T. Beatty, A. S. Lang, F. R. Tabita, J. L. Gibson, T. E. Hanson, C. Bobst, J. L. T. Y. Torres, C. Peres, F. H. Harrison, J. Gibson, C. S. Harwood, Nat. Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 55-61.
[201]	P.-C. Liu, X.-L. Ma, T.-T. Li, F. Yan, L.-J. Wu, X. Xiao, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2020, 151, 104969.
[202]	V. Vinayak, M. J. Khan, S. Varjani, G. D. Saratale, R. G. Saratale, S. K. Bhatia, J. Biotechnol., 2021, 338, 5-19.
[203]	J. C. Lan, K. Raman, C.-M. Huang, C.-M. Chang, Biochem. Eng. J., 2013, 78, 39-43.
[204]	C. Wen, Q. Li, D. Zhu, M. Zhong, S. Zhu, H. Xu, C. Li, S. Zhu, N. Caiola, L. Chen, X. Luo, Water Res., 2024, 267, 122487.
[205]	D. Pradhan, L. B. Sukla, M. Sawyer, P. K. S. M. Rahman, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2017, 55, 1-20.
[206]	C. M. van Genuchten, H. Hamaekers, D. Fraiquin, S. Hollanders, A. Ahmad, Water Res., 2023, 245, 120583.
[207]	N. Touach, V. M. Ortiz-Martínez, M. J. Salar-García, A. Benzaouak, F. Hernández-Fernández, A. P. de Ríos, M. El Mahi, E. M. Lotfi, Particuology, 2017, 34, 147-155.
[208]	Y. Lu, X. Hu, L. Tang, B. Peng, J. Tang, T. Zeng, X. Zhang, Q. Liu, Chemosphere, 2022, 302, 134779.
[209]	N. Touach, A. Benzaouak, J. Toyir, A. El Hamidi, M. El Mahi, E. M. Lotfi, M. Kacimi, L. F. Liotta, Catalysts, 2022, 12, 1424.
[210]	Y. Li, A. Lu, H. Ding, S. Jin, Y. Yan, C. Wang, C. Zen, X. Wang, Electrochem. Commun., 2009, 11, 1496-1499.
[211]	A. B. Patel, S. Shaikh, K. R. Jain, C. Desai, D. Madamwar, Front. Microbiol., 2020, 11, 562813.
[212]	M. R. R. Souza, E. Santos, J. S. Suzarte, L. O. Carmo, M. Frena, F. C. Damasceno, M. R. Alexandre, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2018, 127, 478-483.
[213]	A. Faridi Esfanjani, E. Assadpour, S. M. Jafari, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2018, 76, 56-66.
[214]	L. Li, L. Jiang, L. Yang, J. Li, N. Lu, J. Qu, Sustainability, 2019, 11, 3551.
[215]	Y. Fei, Y. Li, S. Han, J. Ma, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2016, 484, 196-204.
[216]	R. Oldenkamp, A. H. W. Beusen, M. A. J. Huijbregts, Environ. Res. Lett., 2019, 14, 034003.
[217]	J. B. Parsa, T. M. Panah, F. N. Chianeh, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2016, 33, 893-901.
[218]	Y. Yu, Y. Ji, J. Lu, X. Yin, Q. Zhou, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 406, 126759.
[219]	J. Kim, J. Ahn, Food Sci. Biotechnol., 2022, 31, 1481-1499.
[220]	Q.-Q. Zhang, G.-G. Ying, C.-G. Pan, Y.-S. Liu, J.-L. Zhao, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 6772-6782.
[221]	Q. Cai, J. Hu, Water Res., 2018, 140, 251-260.
[222]	Y. Pan, X. Zhang, X. Huang, T. Li, T. Wu, B. Shao, S. Liu, Y. Wang, S. Tang, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 375, 125420.
[223]	H. Ji, Y. Cai, Z. Wang, G. Li, T. An, Water Res., 2022, 221, 118808.
[224]	I. L. Pepper, J. P. Brooks, C. P. Gerba, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018, 52, 3949-3959.
[225]	Q. He, C. Zhao, L. Tang, Z. Liu, B. Shao, Q. Liang, T. Wu, Y. Pan, J. Wang, Y. Liu, S. Tong, T. Hu, Chemosphere, 2023, 326, 138326.
[226]	Q. Liang, X. Liu, B. Shao, L. Tang, Z. Liu, W. Zhang, S. Gong, Y. Liu, Q. He, T. Wu, Y. Pan, S. Tong, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 426, 130831.
[227]	Y. Pan, X. Zhang, T. Wu, B. Shao, T. Li, Q. He, Z. Chen, L. Zhou, S. Liu, X. Huang, Z. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 481, 148506.
[228]	B. Shao, Z. Liu, G. Zeng, Y. Liu, X. Yang, C. Zhou, M. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Jiang, M. Yan, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 362, 318-326.
[229]	R. Daghrir, P. Drogui, Environ. Chem. Lett., 2013, 11, 209-227.
[230]	Q. Liao, H. Rong, M. Zhao, H. Luo, Z. Chu, R. Wang, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 757, 143981.
[231]	M. Ashfaq, Y. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, H. Wang, X. Chen, W. Wu, Z. Huang, C.-P. Yu, Q. Sun, Water Res., 2017, 123, 655-667.
[232]	V. Prigione, V. Tigini, C. Pezzella, A. Anastasi, G. Sannia, G. C. Varese, Water Res., 2008, 42, 2911-2920.
[233]	D. Bhardwaj, N. Bharadvaja, J. Water Process. Eng., 2021, 41, 102080.
[234]	X. Long, H. Wang, C. Wang, X. Cao, X. Li, J. Power Sources, 2019, 415, 145-153.
[235]	M. E. Khan, M. M. Khan, B.-K. Min, M. H. Cho, Sci. Rep., 2018, 8, 1723.
[236]	H. Yuan, L.-F. Liu, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem., 2016, 32, 216-222.
[237]	S. H. Lee, K.-S. Lee, S. Sorcar, A. Razzaq, C. A. Grimes, S.-I. In, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2018, 358, 432-440.
[238]	Q. Chen, L. Liu, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2020, 8, 104143.
[239]	M. Bagheri Esfe, H. Bagheri Esfe, Sci. Iran., 2016, 23, 2791-2799.
[240]	J. Wang, M. G. Abdoulaye, Z. Jiang, B. Xiao, J. Zhang, Y. Liang, J. Xiong, G. Chen, H. Zhu, J. R. Zhao, J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy, 2022, 16, 424-430.
[241]	X. Xu, Z. Zhai, H. Li, Q. Wang, X. Han, H. Yu, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 323, 520-529.
[242]	J.-C. Wu, W.-M. Yan, C.-T. Wang, C.-H. Wang, Y.-H. Pai, K.-C. Wang, Y.-M. Chen, T.-H. Lan, S. Thangavel, Energies, 2018, 11, 565.
[243]	J. Wen, J. Xie, X. Chen, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 72-123.
[244]	S. Louki, N.-E. Touach, A. Benzaouak, M. J. Salar-García, V. M. Ortiz-Martínez, F. J. Hernández-Fernández, A. P. de los Ríos, M. El Mahi, E. M. Lotfi, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2018, 96, 1656-1662.
[245]	X. Yang, X. Qi, G. Ma, Z. Li, Q. Liu, S. Khan, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, Z. Geng, Y. Guo, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 479, 1048-1056.
[246]	H. O. Tugaoen, S. Garcia-Segura, K. Hristovski, P. Westerhoff, Sci. Total Environ., 2017, 599-600, 1524-1551.
[247]	H.-Y. Cheng, X.-D. Tian, C.-H. Li, S.-S. Wang, S.-G. Su, H.-C. Wang, B. Zhang, H. M. A. Sharif, A.-J. Wang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2017, 51, 12948-12955.

Compositions	Photocatalyst	Main result	Maximum power density	Ref.
Dual chamber bioanode-photocathode	Mo/W	metronidazole removal: 94.5%	251mW/m²	[98]
Single chamber photoanode-biocathode	TiO₂/CN nanosheet/graphene	methyl orange: 90.0%	—	[89]
Single chamber MFC with photobiocathode	N-TiO₂	2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal: 100%	—	[99]
Dual chamber bioanode-photocathode	BiOCl/reduced graphene oxide aerogel	oxytetracycline removal: 98.9%	7.33 W/m³	[100]
Dual chamber Photoanode-bioanode-cathode	TiO₂	trimethoprim removal: 100%	75.1 mW/m²	[101]
Dual chamber Photoanode-bioanode-cathode	CdS cage	tetracycline removal: 86.5%	3.37 W/m²	[50]
Single chamber bioanode-photocathode	BaTiO₃	COD removal: 90%	498 mW/m²	[87]
bioanode-photocathode	CdS	Cr(VI) removal: 97.4%	166.93 mW/m²	[102]
Dual chamber photoanode-bioanode-cathode	TiO₂	metronidazole removal: 100%	11.2 mW/m²	[97]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	NiCo₂O₄/MoS₂/graphite felts	Cr(VI) removal: 83.6% phenol removal: 71.6%	362.7 mW/m³	[103]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	GCN-TiO₂	organic matter and sodium dodecyl sulphate removal: 58.2%	1.07 W/m³	[104]
Single chamber photoanode-biofilm anode-air cathode	TiO₂-C-BiVO₄	bisphenol A removal: 96.98%	0.585 W/m²	[96]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	Fe₃O₄/FeWO₄	Cr(VI) removal: 99.98%	124.29 mW/m²	[66]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	CN/ZnO/Bi₄O₅Br₂	rhodamine B removal: 90%	0.35 mW/cm²	[105]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	Ti₃C₂	Cr(VI) removal: 72.84%	702.67 mW/m²	[61]
Single chamber with ICPB anode	BPCNS	2-chlorophenol removal: 67.1%	255 mW/m²	[106]
Single chamber photoanode-bioanode-cathode	TiO₂	2-chlorophenol removal: 76.20%	301 mW/m²	[107]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	BiFeO₃/ZnO	Cu²⁺ removal: 90.7%	1.301 W/m²	[108]
Single chamber photoanode-bioanode-cathode	Ni/MXene	chloramphenicol removal: 82.62%	—	[109]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	AgBr/ZnO	reactive Black 5 removal: 61%	53.87 mW/m²	[86]
Dual chamber vertically photocathode	ZnO/ND	toluene removal: 60.65%	120 mW/m²	[49]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	PANi@CNTs	ibuprofen removal: 75.94%	0.119 W/m²	[110]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	LiNbO₃/CF	ofloxacin removal: 86.5%	0.546 W/m²	[111]
Single chamber photocathode-bioanode	CN/CdS	nitrofurazone removal: 76.0%	—	[46]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	CeO₂/TiO₂	toluene removal: 95%	—	[112]
Dual chamber bioanode-photocathode	CoFe₂O₄	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 95%	409 mW/m³	[113]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	AgBr/CuO	reactive black 5 removal: 56%	61.11 mW/m²	[114]

Compositions	Photocatalyst	Main result	Maximum power density	Ref.
Dual chamber bioanode-photocathode	Mo/W	metronidazole removal: 94.5%	251mW/m²	[98]
Single chamber photoanode-biocathode	TiO₂/CN nanosheet/graphene	methyl orange: 90.0%	—	[89]
Single chamber MFC with photobiocathode	N-TiO₂	2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal: 100%	—	[99]
Dual chamber bioanode-photocathode	BiOCl/reduced graphene oxide aerogel	oxytetracycline removal: 98.9%	7.33 W/m³	[100]
Dual chamber Photoanode-bioanode-cathode	TiO₂	trimethoprim removal: 100%	75.1 mW/m²	[101]
Dual chamber Photoanode-bioanode-cathode	CdS cage	tetracycline removal: 86.5%	3.37 W/m²	[50]
Single chamber bioanode-photocathode	BaTiO₃	COD removal: 90%	498 mW/m²	[87]
bioanode-photocathode	CdS	Cr(VI) removal: 97.4%	166.93 mW/m²	[102]
Dual chamber photoanode-bioanode-cathode	TiO₂	metronidazole removal: 100%	11.2 mW/m²	[97]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	NiCo₂O₄/MoS₂/graphite felts	Cr(VI) removal: 83.6% phenol removal: 71.6%	362.7 mW/m³	[103]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	GCN-TiO₂	organic matter and sodium dodecyl sulphate removal: 58.2%	1.07 W/m³	[104]
Single chamber photoanode-biofilm anode-air cathode	TiO₂-C-BiVO₄	bisphenol A removal: 96.98%	0.585 W/m²	[96]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	Fe₃O₄/FeWO₄	Cr(VI) removal: 99.98%	124.29 mW/m²	[66]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	CN/ZnO/Bi₄O₅Br₂	rhodamine B removal: 90%	0.35 mW/cm²	[105]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	Ti₃C₂	Cr(VI) removal: 72.84%	702.67 mW/m²	[61]
Single chamber with ICPB anode	BPCNS	2-chlorophenol removal: 67.1%	255 mW/m²	[106]
Single chamber photoanode-bioanode-cathode	TiO₂	2-chlorophenol removal: 76.20%	301 mW/m²	[107]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	BiFeO₃/ZnO	Cu²⁺ removal: 90.7%	1.301 W/m²	[108]
Single chamber photoanode-bioanode-cathode	Ni/MXene	chloramphenicol removal: 82.62%	—	[109]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	AgBr/ZnO	reactive Black 5 removal: 61%	53.87 mW/m²	[86]
Dual chamber vertically photocathode	ZnO/ND	toluene removal: 60.65%	120 mW/m²	[49]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	PANi@CNTs	ibuprofen removal: 75.94%	0.119 W/m²	[110]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	LiNbO₃/CF	ofloxacin removal: 86.5%	0.546 W/m²	[111]
Single chamber photocathode-bioanode	CN/CdS	nitrofurazone removal: 76.0%	—	[46]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	CeO₂/TiO₂	toluene removal: 95%	—	[112]
Dual chamber bioanode-photocathode	CoFe₂O₄	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 95%	409 mW/m³	[113]
Dual chamber photocathode-bioanode	AgBr/CuO	reactive black 5 removal: 56%	61.11 mW/m²	[114]

Photocatalyst	Carriers	Coating method	Main result	Ref.
Cu, N-TiO₂	polytetrafluoroethylene	—	phenanthrene removal: 88.63%; TOC removal: 72.20%	[147]
BiOCl/ Bi₂WO₆/Bi	polyurethane sponge	powder spraying method	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 97.2%	[148]
TiO₂	bagasse cellulose	—	methylene blue removal: 78.91%	[67]
TiO₂	bagasse cellulose	—	methylene blue removal: 92.08%	[80]
TiO₂/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	nitrate removal: 40.3%	[143]
Ag-GeO₂/ N-TiO₂	hollow fibers	impregnation method	DOC removal: 98%; COD removal: 91%	[37]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	2-methylisoborneol removal: 88.9%; geosmin removal:85%	[149]
Bi₂₄O₃₁Br₁₀	loofah sponge	powder coating method	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 64.0%	[77]
CN	polyurethane sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 94%	[150]
C-TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	absorbable organic halogen removal: 80.3% COD removal: 90.5%; DOC removal: 86.7%	[74]
TiO₂	porous cellulose	—	COD removal: 92.06%; NH₃^--N removal: 97.16% total phosphorus removal: 94.83%	[151]
Ag-TiO₂	cotton fabric	—	tetracycline removal: 94.7%	[39]
Bi₂WO₆/CN	polyurethane sponge	powder coating method	atrazine removal: 29.2%	[38]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 98%
TiO₂	bagasse cellulose composite	—	absorbable organic halogen removal: 95% COD removal: 91%; DOC removal: 82%	[152]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	low-temperature bonding method	2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal: 100%	[72]
CNT-Ag-TiO₂	CAT@SA	—	congo red removal: 93.5%; COD removal: 94.3%	[73]
CN	CF	—	sulfamethoxazole removal: 95%	[153]
CdS/CN	graphite felts	simple coating procedure	p-chlorophenol removal: 95%; TOC removal: 77%	[142]
SBC-TiO₂	sugarcane bagasse cellulose composite	—	1,2,3-trichlorobenzene removal: 92.03% 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene removal: 95.00%	[154]
Ag-TiO₂	nonwoven cotton fabrics	—	Cu removal: 81.3%	[155]
TiO₂	cellulose carrier	simple and efficient low-temperature process	1,2,4-trichlorobenzene removal: 68.01%	[36]
Fe³⁺/CN	polymeric sponge cubes	—	sulfamethoxazole removal: 96.27 %; COD removal: 86.57%	[156]
UiO-66-NH₂foam	UiO-66-NH₂ foam	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 96.9% ciprofloxacin removal: 87.9%	[157]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	cefalexin removal: 100%	[40]
bio-CdS	polyurethane sponge	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 87.2% Cd²⁺ removal: 98.4%	[158]
gC₃N₄/CdS	loofah sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 95%	[159]
BiOI	CF	—	triclosan removal: 89%	[160]
FeMgAl-LDH	polyurethane sponge	modified powder spraying method	NO₃^-removal: 54.45%; NH₄⁺ removal: 42.57%	[161]
Fe³⁺/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	sulfamethoxazole removal: 81.2%	[120]
CN/MoS₂	chitosan modified polyurethane sponge	—	congo red removal: 99.5%; methyl orange removal: 97.5% carmine removal: 99.5%	[162]
N-TiO₂	bagasse cellulose composite	—	absorbable organic halogen removal: 95% COD removal: 91%; DOC removal: 85%	[132]
BiOBr/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	crude oil removal: 89.08%	[30]
B-Bi₃O₄Cl	polyurethane sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 95%	[20]
BC/CN	BC/CN three-dimensional porous hydrogel	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal:96.0%	[163]
Cu-CN	Cu-CN	—	methyl orange removal:86.04%; reactive blue removal: 97.95%	[129]
TiO₂/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	nitrate removal:75.6%	[164]
B-Bi₃O₄Cl	polyurethane sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 94%; Cr(VI) removal:100%	[165]

Photocatalyst	Carriers	Coating method	Main result	Ref.
Cu, N-TiO₂	polytetrafluoroethylene	—	phenanthrene removal: 88.63%; TOC removal: 72.20%	[147]
BiOCl/ Bi₂WO₆/Bi	polyurethane sponge	powder spraying method	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 97.2%	[148]
TiO₂	bagasse cellulose	—	methylene blue removal: 78.91%	[67]
TiO₂	bagasse cellulose	—	methylene blue removal: 92.08%	[80]
TiO₂/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	nitrate removal: 40.3%	[143]
Ag-GeO₂/ N-TiO₂	hollow fibers	impregnation method	DOC removal: 98%; COD removal: 91%	[37]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	2-methylisoborneol removal: 88.9%; geosmin removal:85%	[149]
Bi₂₄O₃₁Br₁₀	loofah sponge	powder coating method	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 64.0%	[77]
CN	polyurethane sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 94%	[150]
C-TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	absorbable organic halogen removal: 80.3% COD removal: 90.5%; DOC removal: 86.7%	[74]
TiO₂	porous cellulose	—	COD removal: 92.06%; NH₃^--N removal: 97.16% total phosphorus removal: 94.83%	[151]
Ag-TiO₂	cotton fabric	—	tetracycline removal: 94.7%	[39]
Bi₂WO₆/CN	polyurethane sponge	powder coating method	atrazine removal: 29.2%	[38]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 98%
TiO₂	bagasse cellulose composite	—	absorbable organic halogen removal: 95% COD removal: 91%; DOC removal: 82%	[152]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	low-temperature bonding method	2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal: 100%	[72]
CNT-Ag-TiO₂	CAT@SA	—	congo red removal: 93.5%; COD removal: 94.3%	[73]
CN	CF	—	sulfamethoxazole removal: 95%	[153]
CdS/CN	graphite felts	simple coating procedure	p-chlorophenol removal: 95%; TOC removal: 77%	[142]
SBC-TiO₂	sugarcane bagasse cellulose composite	—	1,2,3-trichlorobenzene removal: 92.03% 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene removal: 95.00%	[154]
Ag-TiO₂	nonwoven cotton fabrics	—	Cu removal: 81.3%	[155]
TiO₂	cellulose carrier	simple and efficient low-temperature process	1,2,4-trichlorobenzene removal: 68.01%	[36]
Fe³⁺/CN	polymeric sponge cubes	—	sulfamethoxazole removal: 96.27 %; COD removal: 86.57%	[156]
UiO-66-NH₂foam	UiO-66-NH₂ foam	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 96.9% ciprofloxacin removal: 87.9%	[157]
TiO₂	polyurethane sponge	—	cefalexin removal: 100%	[40]
bio-CdS	polyurethane sponge	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal: 87.2% Cd²⁺ removal: 98.4%	[158]
gC₃N₄/CdS	loofah sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 95%	[159]
BiOI	CF	—	triclosan removal: 89%	[160]
FeMgAl-LDH	polyurethane sponge	modified powder spraying method	NO₃^-removal: 54.45%; NH₄⁺ removal: 42.57%	[161]
Fe³⁺/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	sulfamethoxazole removal: 81.2%	[120]
CN/MoS₂	chitosan modified polyurethane sponge	—	congo red removal: 99.5%; methyl orange removal: 97.5% carmine removal: 99.5%	[162]
N-TiO₂	bagasse cellulose composite	—	absorbable organic halogen removal: 95% COD removal: 91%; DOC removal: 85%	[132]
BiOBr/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	crude oil removal: 89.08%	[30]
B-Bi₃O₄Cl	polyurethane sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 95%	[20]
BC/CN	BC/CN three-dimensional porous hydrogel	—	tetracycline hydrochloride removal:96.0%	[163]
Cu-CN	Cu-CN	—	methyl orange removal:86.04%; reactive blue removal: 97.95%	[129]
TiO₂/CN	polyurethane sponge	—	nitrate removal:75.6%	[164]
B-Bi₃O₄Cl	polyurethane sponge	—	ciprofloxacin removal: 94%; Cr(VI) removal:100%	[165]

Source of inoculum	Recalcitrant pollutant	Microbial species enriched by the addition of contaminants	Ref.
activated sludge	venlafaxine	actinobacteriota (11.2%), proteobacteria (28.3%), chloroflexi (15.1%), acidobacteriota, bacteroidota	[41]
activated sludge	nitrate	acidovorax, thauera, hydrogenophaga, rhodococcus	[164]
activated sludge	sulfadiazine, total nitrogen, total phosphorus	proteobacteria (78.25 %), bacteroidota (4.28 %), actinobacteriota (4.72 %), firmicutes (1.16 %), chloroflexi (7.63 %)	[42]
activated sludge	sulfamethoxazole	Acidovorax (10.2 %), simplicispira (7.5%), castellaniella, raoultella, giesbergeria, alicycliphilus	[186]
activated sludge	ciprofloxacin, Cr(VI)	proteobacteria (44.52%), actinobacteria (18.68%)	[165]
activated sludge	metronidazole	alcaligenes, brevundimonas, pseudochrobactrum, leucobacter	[187]
activated sludge	tetracycline hydrochloride	lactococcus (11.06%), pseudomonas, burkholderiaceae, flavobacterium	[163]
sludge	cefalexin	UKL13-1 (16.37%), flavobacterium (13.93%), fusibacter (11.61%), streptococcus (7.53%), unclassified_f comamonadaceae (5.23%)	[40]
Shewanella oneidensis MR-4	Cd, tetracycline hydrochloride	shewanella oneidensis MR-4	[158]
activated sludge	NO₃⁻, NH₄⁺	proteobacteria, firmicutes, actinobacteria, bacteroidetes	[161]
activated sludge	sulfamethoxazole	nakamurella (44.22%), chryseobacterium (14.33%), rhodanobacter (10.54)	[120]
Rhodopseudomonas palustris	Congo red, methyl orange, carmine	rhodopseudomonas palustris	[162]
activated sludge	absorbable organic halogen	paenibacilus, Ruminiclostridium, sphingbscteriaceae	[132]
activated sludge	crude oil	acinetobacter (79.19%), sphingobium	[30]
activated sludge	ciprofloxacin	pseudoxanthomonas, ferruginibacter, clostridium, stenotrophomonas, comamonas	[20]
activated sludge	1,2,4-trichlorobenzene	methyloversatilis, sediminibacterium, ruminiclostridium, sporomusa	[36]
activated sludge	Cu	proteobacteria (56.3%), actinobacteria (22.7%), bacteroidetes (6.0%), chloroflexi (1.7%), chlorophyta (8.4%), planctomycetes (1.9%), verrucomicrobia (0.5%)	[155]
activated sludge	1,2,3-tricholorobenze, 1,3,5-tricholorobenzene	cutaneotrichosporon, trichoderma, apiotrichum, zoogloea, dechloromonas, flavihumibacter, cupriavidus	[154]
sludge	p-chlorophenol	chryseobacterium (19.98%), stenotrophomonas (17.11%), rhodopseudomonas (9.34%)	[142]
activated sludge	sulfamethoxazole, Cr(VI)	Proteobacteria (52.77%), actinobacteria increased (37.12%), chloroflexus (3.21%), patescibateria (1.46%), bacteroidota (2.57%)	[188]
activated sludge	sulfamethoxazole	nakamurella (55.2%), rhodanobacter (4.05%)	[156]
Rhodopseudomonas palustris	congo red	rhodopseudomonas palustris	[73]
activated sludge	2,4,6-trichlorophenol	acinetobacter, methylophilus, pseudomonas, acidovorax, flavobacterium	[72]
activated sludge	absorbable organic halogen	phanerochaete, cutaneotrichosporon, rozellomycota, candida, rhodotorula	[152]
activated sludge, Scenedesmus obliquus	4-chlorophenol, 4-fluorophenol, phenol	rhodococcus, pseudomonas, scenedesmus obliquus	[37]
activated sludge	absorbable organic halogen	proteobacteria (48.66%), bacteroidetes (13.86%), chloroflexiv (10.93%)	[74]
swine wastewater	ciprofloxacin	alicycliphilus (10.13%), pseudomonas (4.73%), ochrobactrum (6.33%), xanthobacter (6.52%), escherichia-shigella (10.45%)	[150]
activated sludge	tetracycline hydrochloride	bacteriovorax, formivibrio, paludibacter	[77]
activated sludge	2-methylisoborneol, geosmin	zoogloea (24.6%), thauera (15.0%), flavobacterium (2.4%), acinetobacter, Comamonas, brevundimonas	[149]
the urban river (Jinchuan River)	nitrate	chloroflexi (21.92%), acidobacteria (4.20%)	[143]
activated sludge	methylene blue	betaproteobacteri (53.44%), alphaproteobacteria, betaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria, deltaproteobacteria	[80]
soil	phenanthrene	pseudomonadaceae (94.39%)	[147]
Dictyosphaerium	sulfamethazine	dictyosphaerium	[185]

光催化与生物降解协同系统在环境修复中的应用: 综述

The application of photocatalysis and biodegradation synergistic systems in environmental remediation: A review

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 23

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

Source of inoculum	Recalcitrant pollutant	Source of biofilm	Microbial species enriched by the addition of contaminants	Ref.
domestic wastewater	nitrofurazone	bioanode	geobacter (67.73%)	[46]
anaerobic sludge	oxytetracycline	bioanode	geobacter (27.63%)	[100]
municipal wastewater	2,4,6-trichlorophenol	biophoto-cathode	dechlorobacter (8.6%), thauera (9.2%) arenimonas (4.9%)	[99]
—	tetracycline	bioanode	proteobacteria (43.5%), geobacter (33.2%), bacteroidetes (8.7%)	[50]
municipal sludge	metronidazole	bioanode	proteobacteria (53.59%), actinobacteria (29.7%)	[97]
another MFC	o-chlorophenol	bioanode	comamonadaceae (32.1%), Geobacter (22.5%), azospirillum (17.0%)	[106]
another MFC	o-chlorophenol	bioanode	geobacter (54.2%), PHOS-HE36 fam (16.4%), pseudomonas (2.0%)	[107]
activated sludge	trimethoprim	bioanode	proteobacteria (35.0%), actinobacteria (24.1%)	[101]
—	tetracycline	bioanode	proteobacteria (43.5%), geobacter (33.2%)	[50]
—	bisphenol A	biofilm anode	geobacter (33.2%), pseudomonas (11.2%)	[96]
activated sludge	Cr(VI)	bioanode	pseudomonas (20.98%)	[66]
activated sludge	toluene	bioanode	acetobacter (~25%), clostridium_sensu_stricto_12 (13.46%), burkholderia-caballeronia-paraburkholderia (3.33%)	[49]

Nomenclature
ICPB	intimately coupling photocatalysis and biodegradation	MES	microbial electrochemical system
PMFCs	photosynthetic microbial fuel cells	VPCB	visible-light-induced ICPB
SDZ	sulfadiazine	MFC	microbial fuel cell
COD	chemical oxygen demand	TN	total nitrogen
ROS	reactive oxygen species	e^-	electrons
TP	total phosphorus	h⁺	holes
hν	photon energy	VB	valence band
CF	carbon felt	CB	conduction band
PEM	proton exchange membrane	TMP	trimethoprim
TCH	tetracycline hydrochloride	CN	g-C₃N₄
LC	laccase	MO	methyl orange
PL	photoluminescence	DOC	Dissolved organic carbon
SMX	sulfamethoxazole	CNT	carbon nanotube
AOX	adsorbable organic halogens	UV	ultraviolet
CR	congo red	TOC	total organic carbon
MnO_x-cAP	Mn₃O₄/MnO₂-Ag₃PO₄	MB	methylene blue
PHE	phenanthrene	TC	tetracycline
CIP	ciprofloxacin	CP	chlorophenol
TCP	trichlorophenol	ND	nanodiamond
IEM	ion-exchange membrane	PAHs	polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
EET	extracellular electron transport	EAB	electrochemically active bacteria
RhB	rhodamine B	2,4-DCP	2,4-dichlorophenol
MNZ	metronidazole	CF	carbon felt
OTC	oxytetracycline	GSM	geosmin
2-MIB	2-methylisoborneol	DO	dissolved oxygen

[1]	封波, 冯丹宁, 裴燕, 宗保宁, 乔明华, 李伟. 缺陷氮化碳负载铜单原子用于高选择性光催化氧化甲烷制甲醇[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 96-107.
[2]	钟威, 孟爱云, 蔡旭东, 甘义遥, 王敬涛, 苏耀荣. Co诱导不对称电荷分布弱化S-H_ad键增强NiCoS助剂的光催化制氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 108-119.
[3]	郑相阳, 吴金往, 史海峰. 双空位诱导极化场与内建电场增强的S型异质结用于去除抗生素及六价铬[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 50-64.
[4]	季碧铖, 李希成, 高帅, 秦泽平, 汪长征, 王强, 王崇臣. 自发极化增强的空心球Bi₄Ti₃O₁₂促进高效压电光催化: 构效关系与降解机制[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 133-145.
[5]	李世杰, 李蕊, 董珂欣, 刘艳萍, 于欣, 李文尧, 刘通, 赵再望, 张明义, 张宾, 陈晓波. 自漂浮Bi₄O₅Br₂/磷掺杂氮化碳/碳纤维布S型异质结光催化剂增强去除新兴有机污染物[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 37-49.
[6]	李正, 曾影, 董媛媛, 吕红金, 杨国昱. 十钨酸盐+Pd/C催化体系中金属/H⁺位点的调控用于光催化生成糠基乙醚[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 137-146.
[7]	熊祺, 史全全, 王彬力, 李杲. 晶面诱导还原导向的AgBr/Ag⁰/TiO₂{100} Z型异质结用于四环素去除[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 164-179.
[8]	王啟航, 孟利, 李卓, 杨卓然, 汤意南, 余浪, 李志君, 孙建辉, 井立强. 钴单原子-磷酸功能化还原氧化石墨烯/苝四羧酸纳米片异质结用于高效光催化生产过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 192-203.
[9]	陈鸿境, 李月英, 陈敏, 解仲凯, 施伟东. 硫电子桥介导CuInS₂/CuS异质结构实现高选择性CO₂光还原为C₂H₄[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 180-191.
[10]	吴崇备, 楚飞鸿, 郝永超, 李璇, 贾晓月, 孙伊钒, 谷佳璇, 加鹏飞, 王傲冰, 江吉周. 共价有机框架的双氧气还原中心促进光催化合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 329-340.
[11]	张自豪, 张家铭, 王海峰, 刘梦, 许垚, 刘铠玮, 张博杨, 史珂, 张继方, 马贵军. 基于Sm₂Ti₂O₅S₂纳米片各向异性电荷迁移性质提升光催化分解水产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 341-351.
[12]	张鹏坤, 吴秦汉, 王昊昱, 郭东昊, 赖雨洁, 陆东芳, 李吉庆, 林金国, 袁占辉, 陈孝云. Z型异质结Zn₃(OH)₂(V₂O₇)(H₂O)₂/V-Zn(O,S): 钒异价态与氧空位缺陷协同增强可见光催化固氮性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 279-293.
[13]	张琳, 张慧, 方敬红, 崔嘉琳, 刘洁, 刘辉, 孙立水, 孙琼, 董立峰, 赵英杰. 高共轭和化学稳定的三维共价有机框架材料用于高效光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 144-154.
[14]	郑馨龙, 宋一铭, 王崇太, 高奇志, 邵钟鋆, 林佳鑫, 翟佳迪, 李静, 史晓东, 吴道雄, 刘维峰, 黄玮, 陈琦, 田新龙, 刘雨昊. 铜/锌体系多元过渡金属硫化物光催化剂的半导体特性及其光催化制氢的应用与挑战[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 22-70.
[15]	高文婧, 刘玉婵, 陈琛瑶, 练梓棋, 叶融凯, 戚朝荣, 胡建强. 可定量调控的双助催化剂协同电子-空穴传输体系的构筑及其增强的光催化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 319-328.