利用聚苯胺作为电子泵提升铋基电催化CO2向甲酸盐转化

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64833-9

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 80: 237-247.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64833-9

利用聚苯胺作为电子泵提升铋基电催化CO₂向甲酸盐转化

熊菊霞^a^,^b^,¹, 马昊^a^,^b^,¹, 董盈君^a^,^b^,¹, 周翔基^a^,^b, 黎琳波^a^,^b, 孙源淼^a^,^b^,^*(), 张小龙^a^,^b^,^*(), 成会明^a^,^b^,^c^,^*()

^a深圳理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 广东深圳 518107, 中国
^b中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院, 深圳市碳中和能源材料重点实验室, 广东深圳 518055, 中国
^c中国科学院沈阳金属研究所, 沈阳材料科学国家实验室, 辽宁沈阳 110016, 中国
^d米德伯里学院环境科学与化学系, 米德伯里, 美国

收稿日期:2025-03-19 接受日期:2025-08-14 出版日期:2026-01-18 发布日期:2026-01-05
通讯作者: 孙源淼,张小龙,成会明
作者简介:第一联系人：¹共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52201237);深圳市科技创新局(KQTD2022110109364705);深圳市科技创新局(ZDSYS2021070614400003);中国博士后科学基金(E325281005);中国博士后科学基金(E325281003);中国博士后科学基金(2023M743670);中国科学院人才引进项目(E344011);招商局集团与SIAT联合研究项目(E2Z1521);SIAT跨院联合研究青年团队项目(E25427);CPSF博士后研究金项目(GZC20232867)

Improving the electrocatalytic CO₂ to formate conversion on bismuth using polyaniline as an electron pump

Juxia Xiong^a^,^b^,¹, Hao Ma^a^,^b^,¹, Yingjun Dong^a^,^b^,¹, Benjamin Liu^d, Xiangji Zhou^a^,^b, Linbo Li^a^,^b, Yuanmiao Sun^a^,^b^,^*(), Xiaolong Zhang^a^,^b^,^*(), Hui-Ming Cheng^a^,^b^,^c^,^*()

^aFaculty of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen 518107, Guangdong, China
^bShenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
^cShenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning, China
^dDepartment of Environmental Science and Chemistry, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA

Received:2025-03-19 Accepted:2025-08-14 Online:2026-01-18 Published:2026-01-05
Contact: Yuanmiao Sun, Xiaolong Zhang, Hui-Ming Cheng
About author:First author contact:¹These authors contributed equally.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52201237);Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Bureau(KQTD2022110109364705);Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Bureau(ZDSYS2021070614400003);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(E325281005);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(E325281003);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M743670);Talent Introduction Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences(E344011);Joint Research Project of China Merchants Group and SIAT(E2Z1521);Cross Institute Joint Research Youth Team Project of SIAT(E25427);Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF(GZC20232867)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用可再生电力进行电化学二氧化碳还原反应(CO₂RR)生产有价值化学品和燃料, 是形成碳循环的重要策略. 开发高效的电催化剂以提高CO₂RR的动力学, 使其转化为目标产品并实现最小化能量输入, 是这项技术的关键. 铋基电催化剂通过单电子和质子传递过程优先形成*OCHO中间体, 因此非常有潜力将CO₂还原为甲酸(HCOOH)或甲酸盐(HCOO⁻). 然而, 在铋上形成关键的*OCHO中间体的决速步骤, 即耦合的H⁺/e⁻转移是一个缓慢的吸热过程, 导致过电位高和HCOOH/HCOO⁻高选择性生成的电位窗口狭窄, 而铋的局部化p轨道电子态使得通过电子结构修改调整中间体结合行为非常具有挑战性.

对催化剂表面进行功能化分子修饰是调控过渡金属电子结构的有效策略, 电负性较高的分子可从催化剂中抽取电子, 而电负性较低的分子则可通过p反馈键向催化剂提供电子, 从而实现对金属d带中心的精准调控. 因此本文尝试将此类策略应用于铋的p轨道调控, 以增强其CO₂RR性能. 本文选择聚苯胺(PANI)作为铋表面的有机修饰剂, 其具备电子离域化的富氮碳链结构和贯穿聚合物主链的π共轭体系. 通过开发一种原位聚合技术, 以Bi(NO₃)₃同时作为聚合引发剂和铋源, 制备出PANI-Bi杂化材料, 其具有铋原子与聚苯胺网络紧密结合的结构特征, 形成了大量有机-无机界面. 实验结果表明, PANI-Bi杂化电催化剂的CO₂RR性能显著提升, 在高达800 mA cm⁻²的电流密度下, 甲酸盐生产的单程碳效率超过48.7%. 结合实验与计算结果发现, 聚苯胺通过p反馈键向相邻铋原子捐赠电子, 改变铋活性位点的p轨道电子分布, 促使CO₂RR反应转向生成*OCHO中间体的甲酸盐路径, 有效地阻抑CO生成相关中间体的形成, 从而促进甲酸盐的选择性生成. 这种通过聚合物功能化调控金属催化剂电子结构的方法, 揭示了电子特性与反应路径之间的内在关联, 为提升纳米结构材料的催化性能提供了新思路.

综上, 未来研究需聚焦电子结构精准调控, 通过有机-无机界面设计优化中间体吸附能, 拓宽高选择性电位窗口; 同时开发高通量催化剂合成策略, 推动CO₂RR在工业级电流密度下的稳定性与能效提升, 实现碳循环技术的规模化应用.

关键词: CO₂还原, 电催化, 铋基催化剂, 聚苯胺, 电子调制泵

Abstract:

Bi-based catalysts are known to promote the electrochemical reduction of CO₂to formic acid (HCOOH) or formate (HCOO^-). However, their implementation presents challenges: the first H⁺/e^- pair transfer to form the key *OCHO intermediate on a Bi surface is a slow, kinetically sluggish endergonic process, resulting in a large overpotential and narrow potential window for high HCOOH/HCOO^- selectivity. Altering the localized p-orbital electron states of Bi to change intermediate binding behaviors is difficult. We addressed this problem by using an in-situ polymerization method to obtain a polyaniline-Bi hybrid (PANI-Bi) with Bi surrounded by PANI chains. Combined experimental and computational studies indicate that the polyaniline acted as an “electron pump” that facilitated charge transfer from the PANI backbone to the Bi surface and changed the p-orbital electrons of the Bi active sites. This lowered the energy barrier for the adsorption of intermediates and facilitated *OCHO formation. Consequently, a significant increase in formate production was observed, achieving a single-pass carbon efficiency exceeding 48.7% at 800 mA cm^-2. This organic functionalization strategy, aimed at modifying the electronic structure of heterogeneous catalysts, offers a promising approach for achieving highly selective electroreduction of CO₂ at a high current density.

Key words: CO₂ reduction, Electrocatalysis, Bi-based catalyst, Polyaniline, Electron pump

熊菊霞, 马昊, 董盈君, 周翔基, 黎琳波, 孙源淼, 张小龙, 成会明. 利用聚苯胺作为电子泵提升铋基电催化CO₂向甲酸盐转化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80: 237-247.

Juxia Xiong, Hao Ma, Yingjun Dong, Benjamin Liu, Xiangji Zhou, Linbo Li, Yuanmiao Sun, Xiaolong Zhang, Hui-Ming Cheng. Improving the electrocatalytic CO₂ to formate conversion on bismuth using polyaniline as an electron pump[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 80: 237-247.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64833-9

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V80/I1/237

图/表 4

Fig. 1. Synthesis and structural characterization of PANI-Bi: (a) Schematic of PANI-Bi synthesis (“Substrate” = PTFE carbon, gray = C, white = H, blue = N, white = Bi). (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of PANI-Bi. SEM images of upper PANI-Bi catalyst layer (c) and PTFE carbon (d). (e) Cross-sectional image and corresponding EDS elemental maps of Bi, N, and C. (f) SEM surface scanning line diagrams of Bi, N, and C. (g, h) representative high-resolution TEM image of PANI-Bi. (i) Contact angle measurements of PANI-Bi. (j) Gas permeability of PTFE carbon, Bi, and PANI-Bi electrodes.

Fig. 2. Electronic structural and compositional characterization of Bi and PANI-Bi electrocatalyst before CO2 reduction. (a) XRD patterns. (b) FTIR of the Bi and PANI-Bi samples. (c) CO2 adsorption capacity from CO2-TPD data. XPS spectra of Bi 4f (d) and N 1s (e) for PANI-Bi and Bi catalysts. (f) Bi L-edge XANES spectra of PANI-Bi and a physically mixed PANI/Bi sample compared to Bi foil or Bi2O3 standards.

Fig. 3. CO2 electroreduction performance: FE of HCOO- (a) and H2 and CO (b) for Bi and PANI-Bi. Error bars represent standard deviations of three measurements. (c) Comparison of FE as a function of formate current density with catalysts reported in literature (Table S2). (d) Long-term operation of reduction device for pure HCOO- solution production at ?0.57 V. PANI-Bi catalyst displays impressive stability over 75 h at 200 mA cm?2 average current density. Comparison of CO2RR performances for a PANI-Bi catalyst on conventional carbon paper and PTFE carbon: schematic of CO2 distributions in conventional carbon paper (e) and PTFE carbon (f). (g) Single-pass conversion efficiencies of CO2R to HCOO- with PANI-Bi hybrid on PTFE carbon and carbon paper, respectively, at 800 mA cm?2 using different CO2 flow rates.

Fig. 4. Results of DFT calculations and proposed mechanism. (a) Structural model of Bi (012) surface and PANI-Bi (012) surface. (b) Free energy diagram for CO2RR on Bi (012) and PANI-Bi (012) surfaces; red lines represent corresponding rate-determining steps. (c) Free energy diagram for HER on Bi (012) and PANI-Bi (012) surfaces. (d) Comparison of adsorption energy for adsorbed *COOH and *OCHO species on Bi (012) and PANI-Bi (012) surfaces. (e) Partial density of states for Bi (012) and PANI-Bi (012) surfaces; Fermi level is set to zero. (f) Charge density difference for PANI-Bi (012) surface (upper panel); cyan and yellow represent charge depletion and charge accumulation areas, respectively. Local density of states for Bi (012) and PANI-Bi (012) surfaces with adsorbed *OCHO species (bottom panel). (g) Expected reaction mechanism of formate and CO formation during CO2RR on the PANI-Bi (012) surface.

参考文献

[1]	M. Zhong, K. Tran, Y. Min, C. Wang, Z. Wang, C.-T. Dinh, P. De Luna, Z. Yu, A. S. Rasouli, P. Brodersen, S. Sun, O. Voznyy, C.-S. Tan, M. Askerka, F. Che, M. Liu, A. Seifitokaldani, Y. Pang, S.-C. Lo, A. Ip, Z. Ulissi, E. H. Sargent, Nature, 2020, 581, 178-183.
[2]	F. Li, A. Thevenon, A. Rosas-Hernández, Z. Wang, Y. Li, C. M. Gabardo, A. Ozden, C. T. Dinh, J. Li, Y. Wang, J. P. Edwards, Y. Xu, C. McCallum, L. Tao, Z.-Q. Liang, M. Luo, X. Wang, H. Li, C. P. O’Brien, C.-S. Tan, D.-H. Nam, R. Quintero-Bermudez, T.-T. Zhuang, Y. C. Li, Z. Han, R. D. Britt, D. Sinton, T. Agapie, J. C. Peters, E. H. Sargent, Nature, 2020, 577, 509-513.
[3]	Y. Y. Birdja, E. Pérez-Gallent, M. C. Figueiredo, A. J. Göttle, F. Calle-Vallejo, M. T. M. Koper, Nat. Energy, 2019, 4, 732-745.
[4]	P. Li, J. Bi, J. Liu, Y. Wang, X. Kang, X. Sun, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Zhu, B. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 4675-4682.
[5]	L. Bian, Y. Bai, J.-Y. Chen, H.-K. Guo, S. Liu, H. Tian, N. Tian, Z.-L. Wang, ACS Nano, 2025, 19, 9304-9316.
[6]	B. Ren, G. Wen, R. Gao, D. Luo, Z. Zhang, W. Qiu, Q. Ma, X. Wang, Y. Cui, L. Ricardez-Sandoval, A. Yu, Z. Chen, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 2486.
[7]	L. Bian, Z.-Y. Zhang, H. Tian, N.-N. Tian, Z. Ma, Z.-L. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 54, 199-211.
[8]	F. Li, G. H. Gu, C. Choi, P. Kolla, S. Hong, T.-S. Wu, Y.-L. Soo, J. Masa, S. Mukerjee, Y. Jung, J. Qiu, Z. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 277, 119241.
[9]	Y. Kong, X. Jiang, X. Li, J. Sun, Q. Hu, X. Chai, H. Yang, C. He, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 45, 95-106.
[10]	L. Yi, J. Chen, P. Shao, J. Huang, X. Peng, J. Li, G. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Wen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 20112-20119.
[11]	P.-P. Yang, M.-R. Gao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2023, 52, 4343-4380.
[12]	A. D. Handoko, F. Wei, Jenndy, B. S. Yeo, Z. W. Seh, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 922-934.
[13]	L. Li, A. Ozden, S. Guo, F. P,. Garcı́a de Arquer, C. Wang, M. Zhang, J. Zhang, H. Jiang, W. Wang, H. Dong, D. Sinton, E. H. Sargent, M. Zhong, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 5223.
[14]	F. Yang, A. O. Elnabawy, R. Schimmenti, P. Song, J. Wang, Z. Peng, S. Yao, R. Deng, S. Song, Y. Lin, M. Mavrikakis, W. Xu, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 1088.
[15]	X. Feng, H. Zou, R. Zheng, W. Wei, R. Wang, W. Zou, G. Lim, J. Hong, L. Duan, H. Chen, Nano Lett., 2022, 22, 1656-1664.
[16]	W. Ma, J. Bu, Z. Liu, C. Yan, Y. Yao, N. Chang, H. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2006704.
[17]	J. Zhu, J. Li, R. Lu, R. Yu, S. Zhao, C. Li, L. Lv, L. Xia, X. Chen, W. Cai, J. Meng, W. Zhang, X. Pan, X. Hong, Y. Dai, Y. Mao, J. Li, L. Zhou, G. He, Q. Pang, Y. Zhao, C. Xia, Z. Wang, L. Dai, L. Mai, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 4670.
[18]	B. Hammer, Y. Morikawa, J. K. Nørskov, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 76, 2141-2144.
[19]	D. Raciti, C. Wang, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 1545-1556.
[20]	H. Li, T. Liu, P. Wei, L. Lin, D. Gao, G. Wang, X. Bao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 14329-14333.
[21]	Z. Liu, J. Cao, B. Wu, L. Qian, A. Guan, C. Yang, X. Lv, L. Zhang, G. Zheng, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 12555-12562.
[22]	J. Zhang, J. Ding, Y. Liu, C. Su, H. Yang, Y. Huang, B. Liu, Joule, 2023, 7, 1700-1744.
[23]	A. N. Grace, S. Y. Choi, M. Vinoba, M. Bhagiyalakshmi, D. H. Chu, Y. Yoon, S. C. Nam, S. K. Jeong, Appl. Energy, 2014, 120, 85-94.
[24]	Z. Zeng, Y. Chen, X. Zhu, L. Yu, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2023, 34, 107728.
[25]	M. Esmaeilirad, Z. Jiang, A. M. Harzandi, A. Kondori, M. Tamadoni Saray, C. U. Segre, R. Shahbazian-Yassar, A. M. Rappe, M. Asadi, Nat. Energy, 2023, 8, 891-900.
[26]	X. Wang, Q. Hu, G. Li, H. Yang, C. He, Electrochem. Energy Rev., 2022, 5, 28.
[27]	L. Li, Y. Zhang, H. Lu, Y. Wang, J. Xu, J. Zhu, C. Zhang, T. Liu, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 62.
[28]	J. Cheng, L. Chen, X. Xie, K. Feng, H. Sun, Y. Qin, W. Hua, Z. Zheng, Y. He, W. Pan, W. Yang, F. Lyu, J. Zhong, Z. Deng, Y. Jiao, Y. Peng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202312113.
[29]	C. Li, Z. Liu, X. Zhou, L. Zhang, Z. Fu, Y. Wu, X. Lv, G. Zheng, H. Chen, Energy Environ. Sci., 2023, 16, 3885-3898.
[30]	S. Ahn, K. Klyukin, R. J. Wakeham, J. A. Rudd, A. R. Lewis, S. Alexander, F. Carla, V. Alexandrov, E. Andreoli, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 4132-4142.
[31]	L. Huang, G. Gao, C. Yang, X.-Y. Li, R.-K. Miao, Y. Xue, K. Xie, P. Ou, C. T. Yavuz, Y. Han, G. Magnotti, D. Sinton, E. H. Sargent, X. Lu, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 2958.
[32]	A. Samadi, M. Xie, J. Li, H. Shon, C. Zheng, S. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 418, 129425.
[33]	X. Cao, Y. Tian, J. Ma, W. Guo, W. Cai, J. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2309648.
[34]	J. Kang, X. Chen, R. Si, X. Gao, S. Zhang, G. Teobaldi, A. Selloni, L.-M. Liu, L. Guo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202217428.
[35]	Y. Chen, X.-Y. Li, Z. Chen, A. Ozden, J. E. Huang, P. Ou, J. Dong, J. Zhang, C. Tian, B.-H. Lee, X. Wang, S. Liu, Q. Qu, S. Wang, Y. Xu, R.-K. Miao, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, C. Qiu, J. Abed, H. Liu, H. Shin, D. Wang, Y. Li, D. Sinton, E. H. Sargent, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2024, 19, 311-318.
[36]	M. Beygisangchin, S. Abdul Rashid, S. Shafie, A. R. Sadrolhosseini, H. N. Lim, Polymers, 2021, 13, 2003.
[37]	P. Deng, H. Wang, R. Qi, J. Zhu, S. Chen, F. Yang, L. Zhou, K. Qi, H. Liu, B.-Y. Xia, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 743-750.
[38]	B. I. Nandapure, S. B. Kondawar, M. Y. Salunkhe, A. I. Nandapure, Adv. Mater. Lett., 2013, 4, 134-140.
[39]	T. Liu, L. Finn, M. Yu, H. Wang, T. Zhai, X. Lu, Y. Tong, Y. Li, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 2522-2527.
[40]	H. Wang, W. Wang, H. Yu, Q. Mao, Y. Xu, X. Li, Z. Wang, L. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 307, 121172.
[41]	X. Xu, H. Ullah, M. Humayun, L. Li, X. Zhang, M. Bououdina, D. P. Debecker, K. Huo, D. Wang, C. Wang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33, 2303986.
[42]	K. Wu, J. Xiong, Y. Sun, J. Wu, M. Fu, D. Ye, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 428, 128172.
[43]	Q. Gong, P. Ding, M. Xu, X. Zhu, M. Wang, J. Deng, Q. Ma, N. Han, Y. Zhu, J. Lu, Z. Feng, Y. Li, W. Zhou, Y. Li, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 2807.
[44]	Y. Zhang, F. Li, X. Zhang, T. Williams, C. D. Easton, A. M. Bond, J. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 4714-4720.
[45]	B. Thomas, C. Tang, M. Ramírez-Hernández, T. Asefa, ChemPlusChem, 2023, 88, e202300104.
[46]	Z. Cao, J. S. Derrick, J. Xu, R. Gao, M. Gong, E. M. Nichols, P. T. Smith, X. Liu, X. Wen, C. Copéret, C. J. Chang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 4981-4985.
[47]	C. E. Creissen, J. G. Rivera de la Cruz, D. Karapinar, D. Taverna, M. W. Schreiber, M. Fontecave, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202206279.
[48]	P. Lamagni, M. Miola, J. Catalano, M. S. Hvid, M. A. H. Mamakhel, M. Christensen, M. R. Madsen, H. S. Jeppesen, X.-M. Hu, K. Daasbjerg, T. Skrydstrup, N. Lock, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30, 1910408.

利用聚苯胺作为电子泵提升铋基电催化CO₂向甲酸盐转化

Improving the electrocatalytic CO₂ to formate conversion on bismuth using polyaniline as an electron pump

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 4

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	马毅, 葛欢, 章勇, 简宁, 唐嘉陵, 胡宗坤, 于静, 李灿煌, 李露明, 李军山. 基于Ag与NiFe-LDH协同作用实现电催化PET碱性水解产物选择性制备甲酸盐与乙醇酸盐[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 282-292.
[2]	向家奇, 陈立妙, 陈善勇, 刘又年. 电化学二氧化碳还原中的碱阳离子效应[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 38-58.
[3]	杜斌杰, 肖宇航, 谭骁鸿, 何炜东, 郭莹莹, 崔浩, 王成新. 双相Cu-Co/CoO异质结通过中间体传递实现高效串联硝酸盐电还原[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 270-281.
[4]	时文博, 朱凯, 付小刚, 刘陈红, 原洋, 潘家梁, 张庆, 白正宇. 双位点限域策略调控Fe-N-C电子结构提升质子交换膜燃料电池氧还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 293-303.
[5]	门亚娜, 矫宇州, 郑妍星, 王晓晏, 陈胜利, 李朋. 质子型离子液体调控分子铁催化剂氧还原活性的pH依赖性及其电化学界面起源[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 258-269.
[6]	蒋浩朋, 李金河, 于晓慧, 董慧龙, 王伟康, 刘芹芹. β-酮烯胺共价键桥接的S型异质结实现同步光还原CO₂为CO以及茴香醇选择性氧化为茴香醛[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 113-122.
[7]	杨丹, 崔翔, 徐周, 颜前, 吴雅婷, 周春梅, 戴翼虎, 万晓月, 靳玉广, 杨艳辉. 配体保护的精确结构镍纳米团簇高效电催化甘油氧化制甲酸[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 185-197.
[8]	翁应龙, 张建平, 张坤, 路亦通, 黄婷婷, 康英博, 韩晓彤, 邱介山. 先进电催化功能碳基材料研究新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 10-36.
[9]	孙燕, 张蕾. 双功能核壳Cu₂O@NiFe₂O₄ Z型纳米反应器光辅助电催化同步氧化-还原合成鸟粪石[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 230-241.
[10]	朱鸿睿, 王希伦, 赵娟涓, 尹梦晗, 徐慧民, 李高仁. 基于Ni单原子/P,N掺杂非晶态NiFe₂O₄作为阳极和Ag@CuO/Cu₂O纳米立方体作为阴极组成的高效光电化学系统用于微塑料氧化和二氧化碳还原[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 159-172.
[11]	李原锐, 张晓磊, 李彤, 胡程, 陈芳, 蔡豪, 黄洪伟. 少层氧空位Bi₂O₂(OH)NO₃用于水和空气双通道压电催化产H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 105-114.
[12]	张冰洁, 王春燕, 杨甫林, 王书莉, 冯立纲. 功函数差异自发诱导Ir/MoSe₂内置电场催化高效PEM水电解[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 95-104.
[13]	李存军, 何杰, 蔡天乐, 陈贤雷, 陶亨聪, 周英棠, 朱明山. 溴氧铋表面氧空位调控压电性质用于提升光催化CO₂还原反应效率与产物选择性[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 130-143.
[14]	李亚慧, 陈宇, 郭锦瑜, 王锐, 赵淑娜, 李纲, 臧双全. 调控COF共价连接的多吡啶镍催化剂微环境促进光催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 155-166.
[15]	张琳, 张慧, 方敬红, 崔嘉琳, 刘洁, 刘辉, 孙立水, 孙琼, 董立峰, 赵英杰. 高共轭和化学稳定的三维共价有机框架材料用于高效光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 144-154.