碳包覆铁基催化剂合成策略对CO2改进费托合成性能的调控机制研究

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65007-3

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 84: 236-249.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65007-3

碳包覆铁基催化剂合成策略对CO₂改进费托合成性能的调控机制研究

蒋仕灿^a, 易明宇^a, 刘作政^a, Abhishek Dutta Chowdhury^a^,^b()

^a 武汉大学化学与分子科学学院, 湖北武汉 430072
^b 武汉科技大学化学与化工学院, 核磁共振与分子科学交叉研究院, 湖北武汉 430081

收稿日期:2025-07-29 接受日期:2025-11-19 出版日期:2026-05-18 发布日期:2026-04-16
通讯作者: *电子信箱: abhishek@whu.edu.cn, abhishek@wust.edu.cn (A. Chowdhury).
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22572150);国家自然科学基金(22350610243);湖北自然科学基金(2025AFA008);武汉科技大学启动基金

Linking catalyst synthesis strategies to CO₂-modified Fischer-Tropsch performance in iron-carbon systems

Shican Jiang^a, Mingyu Yi^a, Zuozheng Liu^a, Abhishek Dutta Chowdhury^a^,^b()

^a College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China
^b Interdisciplinary Institute of NMR and Molecular Sciences, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, China

Received:2025-07-29 Accepted:2025-11-19 Online:2026-05-18 Published:2026-04-16
Contact: *E-mail: abhishek@whu.edu.cn, abhishek@wust.edu.cn (A. Chowdhury).
About author:First author contact:CRediT authorship contribution statement
Shican Jiang: Writing - original draft, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Mingyu Yi: Catalyst evaluation, Data analysis. Zuozheng Liu: Catalyst evaluation, Data analysis. Abhishek Dutta Chowdhury: Conceptualization, Data analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Writing - review & editing.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22572150);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22350610243);Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(2025AFA008);start-up research grant from Wuhan University of Science and Technology(China)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

化石燃料的过度使用导致CO₂排放量增加, 进而加剧了温室效应, 导致全球变暖速度加快并引发了海水酸化等一系列环境问题, 严重威胁着人类的生存和发展. 通过将捕集到的CO₂与“绿氢”(风能和太阳能等可再生能源电解水制得)进行热催化加氢反应, 可高效合成液态碳氢化合物(C₅₊), 在能源利用方面具有重要意义. 相较于甲烷、一氧化碳等气态产物, 汽油、芳烃等液态碳氢化合物具有能量密度高、储运方便的优点, 同时也有助于解决氢能储存难、安全性差等问题. 铁基催化剂因具备优异的逆水煤气变换与费托合成活性, 在CO₂加氢费托合成(CO₂-FTS)中受到青睐. 近年来, 碳包覆铁基催化剂(Fe@C)因其高金属载量和分散性以及强的C-O活化和C-C偶联能力在CO₂加氢制C₅₊液态碳氢化合物中被广泛研究. 然而, 目前碳包覆铁基催化剂仍存在制备过程复杂、依赖昂贵MOF材料进行煅烧衍生, 且需要高温预还原步骤等问题, 限制了其工业化进程. 此外, 碳包覆铁基催化剂的结构对催化性能的影响机制仍未完全阐明, 因此厘清铁基催化剂结构-性能之间的关系十分必要.

本文从调控碳包覆铁基催化剂的结构出发, 采用球磨或浸渍法将商业铁盐(乙酰丙酮铁或甘氨酸亚铁)与有机配体(均苯三酸或水杨酸)混合, 随后在惰性气氛下进行高温热解, 制得碳包覆铁基催化剂(Fe@C与Fe@NC). 将该系列催化剂应用于CO₂加氢反应, 系统考察其催化合成C₅₊液态碳氢化合物的性能. X射线粉末衍射、扫描电镜、高分辨透射电镜等表征结果表明了具有多孔结构的碳包覆铁基催化剂的成功制备. H₂和CO₂程序升温脱附实验证明了催化剂结构的调控改善了反应物分子吸附活化行为, 促进了H₂和CO₂分子的中等强度吸附. 氮气吸脱附实验表明了催化剂结构调控影响了气体分子的脱附行为并增加了传质阻力, 进而影响了产物的选择性。在CO₂加氢测试中, 甘氨酸亚铁与均苯三酸球磨制备的催化剂在温和条件下表现出了35%的CO₂转化率、76%的C₅₊烃类选择性、12%的C1选择性(CO: 6%, CH₄: 6%). 对反应条件进一步优化后, 催化剂的C₅₊烃类收率可达到42.5 mmol CO₂ × g^‒1 × h^‒1, 为目前文献报道的最高水平. 动力学实验也证实了对催化剂结构的调控促进了CO₂向目标产物C₅₊液态碳氢化合物的高效转化. 甘氨酸亚铁和水杨酸浸渍制备的碳包覆铁基催化剂与ZSM-5组成的双功能催化体系表现出了40%的CO₂转化率、69%的芳烃选择性、15%的C1选择性(CO: 9%, CH₄: 6%)以及超过80 h的催化稳定性. 本工作实现了对催化剂的孔隙结构、粒径与表面组成的调控, 建立了合成路径、催化剂结构与性能之间的构效关系.

综上, 本文采用了一种简单的催化剂结构调控方法制备出了高效的碳包覆铁基催化剂, 实现了CO₂向C₅₊液态碳氢化合物和芳烃的高效与稳定转化, 为高性能CO₂加氢催化剂的设计、制备和应用提供了一种安全、简便且可规模化的策略.

关键词: 多相催化, CO₂加氢, 费托合成, 碳氢化合物, 碳化铁

Abstract:

The direct thermocatalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ into value-added hydrocarbons is vital for advancing a sustainable carbon economy. However, the structural complexity and multi-step nature of catalyst synthesis often obscure the direct relationship between synthesis protocol and catalytic performance. To address this gap, we present an operationally simpler, safer to start up, and scalable strategy to develop carbon-coated iron-based catalysts (Fe@C and Fe@NC) through ball milling or impregnation of commercial iron salts with simple organic ligands (trimesic acid or salicylic acid), followed by pyrolysis. These catalysts feature tunable porosity, particle size, and surface composition, enabling systematic performance optimization in CO₂-modified Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (CO₂-FTS). Ball milling proved more effective for Fe@C systems, while impregnation was superior for Fe@NC systems, both achieving high selectivity for long-chain (C₅⁺) hydrocarbons and suppressing undesired C₁ byproducts. Ball milling promotes active site dispersion and carburization via porous frameworks, whereas impregnation facilitates cavity formation favorable for catalysis. Coupling these iron-based catalysts with ZSM-5 zeolites enabled aromatics production with enhanced stability. Correlations between synthesis route, catalyst architecture, and performance (activity, selectivity, structural control) were established. This work offers a practical synthesis-performance framework for designing CO₂-FTS catalysts, supporting future developments in carbon valorization and e-fuel production.

Key words: Heterogeneous catalysis, CO₂ hydrogenation, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Hydrocarbons, Iron-carbide

蒋仕灿, 易明宇, 刘作政, Abhishek Dutta Chowdhury. 碳包覆铁基催化剂合成策略对CO₂改进费托合成性能的调控机制研究[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84: 236-249.

Shican Jiang, Mingyu Yi, Zuozheng Liu, Abhishek Dutta Chowdhury. Linking catalyst synthesis strategies to CO₂-modified Fischer-Tropsch performance in iron-carbon systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84: 236-249.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65007-3

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V84/I5/236

图/表 8

Fig. 1. The schematic presentation of catalyst synthesis strategies (ball milling vs. impregnation) used in this work, including their nomenclature (ferrous glycinate-FG, ferric acetylacetonate-FAC, trimesic acid-BTC, salicylic acid-SA).

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of standalone ligand, commercial iron salt, and iron-ligand complexes (a), Fe@C-FAC+BTC-based (b), and Fe@C-FAC+SA-based (c) pyrolyzed catalysts (ferric acetylacetonate-FAC, trimesic acid-BTC, salicylic acid-SA, ball milling-BM, impregnation-IM).

Fig. 3. Preliminary catalytic performance evaluation of pyrolyzed K-promoted Fe@C-catalysts after adding organic ligands at different mass ratios and using different protocols (i.e., BM vs. IM). The comparison between K/Fe@C-FAC and K/Fe@C-FAC catalysts with different Fe salts/BTC mass ratios (a) and their synthesis method (b). (c) The comparison between K/Fe@C-FAC and K/Fe@C-FAC catalysts with different mass ratios of Fe salts/SA. Reaction conditions: without any reductive treatment, H2/CO2?=?3, 350?°C, 3?MPa, 18000?mL g-1 h-1 at a time on stream of 6-7 h. See Figs. S19-S30 for the full TOS data. Note that synthesized materials were presented in a “Fe@C-FAC+BTC (or SA)-x-y+ BM (or IM) manner, where x and y refer to the mass ratio of commercial iron salts to carbon sources (ligands), respectively (ferric acetylacetonate-FAC, trimesic acid-BTC, salicylic acid-SA, ball milling-BM, impregnation-IM).

Fig. 4. XRD patterns of ligand, commercial iron salt and iron-ligand complexes (a), Fe@NC+BTC-based catalysts (b), and Fe@NC+SA-based catalysts (c). Ferrous glycinate-FG, trimesic acid-BTC, salicylic acid-SA, ball milling-BM, impregnation-IM.

Fig. 5. Preliminary catalytic performance evaluation of pyrolyzed K-promoted Fe@NC-catalysts after adding organic ligands at different mass ratios and using different protocols (i.e., BM vs. IM). Evaluation of K/Fe@NC-FG catalysts with a different mass ratio of commercial iron salts to BTC (a) and their different synthesis methods (b). (c) Evaluation of K/Fe@NC-FG catalysts with a different mass ratio of commercial iron salts to SA. Reaction conditions: without any reductive treatment, H2/CO2 = 3, 350 °C, 3 MPa, 18000 mL g-1 h-1 at a time on stream of 6-7 h. See Figs. S43-S54 for the full TOS data. Note that synthesized materials were presented in a “Fe@NC-FG+BTC (or SA)-x-y+ BM (or IM) manner, where x and y refer to the mass ratio of commercial iron salts to carbon sources (ligands), respectively (ferrous glycinate-FG trimesic acid-BTC, salicylic acid-SA, ball milling-BM, impregnation-IM).

Fig. 6. Impact of synthesis method and reaction parameters on FTS performance over K-promoted K/Fe@NC-FG (a) and K/Fe@C-FAC (b) catalytic systems, along with their net selectivity increase/decrease with respect to organic-free catalytic systems (c,d). Reaction conditions: without any reductive treatment, H2/CO2 = 3, 350-240 °C, 3 MPa, 18000-4800 mL g-1 h-1 at a time on stream of 6-7 h. See Figs.S19-S30, S43-69 for the full TOS data. Note that synthesized materials were presented in a “Fe@NC-FG+BTC (or SA)-x-y+ BM (or IM) manner, where x and y refer to the mass ratio of commercial iron salts to carbon sources (ligands), respectively (ferrous glycinate-FG, ferric acetylacetonate-FAC, trimesic acid-BTC, salicylic acid-SA, ball milling-BM, impregnation-IM).

Fig. 7. Catalyst performance evaluation of bifunctional (K/Fe@NC-FG+SA-1-1+IM + zeolite ZSM-5)-based catalytic systems during CO2-derived FTS process. Combined with ZSM-5 zeolites with different silica-alumina ratios (a) and different integration manners (b). Reaction conditions: H2/CO2 = 3, 350 °C, 3 MPa, F = 12 mL/min, K/Fe@NC-FG+SA-1-1+IM: 40 mg, ZSM-5: 80 mg at a time on stream of 20 h We refer to Figs. S76?S81 for additional catalysis figures (ferrous glycinate-FG, salicylic acid-SA, impregnation-IM).

Fig. 8. The hypothesized working protocol is based on the understanding of this work. Direct pyrolysis of iron salts causes agglomeration, reducing active site exposure and activity. Ball milling with trimesic acid or impregnation with salicylic acid before pyrolysis improves dispersion, reduces particle size, and forms porous structures. These features enhance CO2 and H2 adsorption, promote long-chain hydrocarbon growth, and achieve high CO2 conversion with superior preferential multi-carbon product selectivity and lower undesired C1 selectivity. Our catalytic system features a high degree of graphitization, an additional carbon source that enhances the dispersion of metal particles within the carbon matrix, a unique pore geometry that ensures rapid diffusion, and suitable K and N promoters acting as effective electron donors to influence CO2 dissociation and carbon-carbon coupling.

参考文献

[1]	G. Singh, J. Lee, A. Karakoti, R. Bahadur, J. Yi, D. Zhao, K. AlBahily, A. Vinu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 4360-4404.
[2]	S.-K. Kim, J. Shin, S.-I. An, H.-J. Kim, N. Im, S.-P. Xie, J.-S. Kug, S.-W. Yeh, Nat. Clim. Chang., 2022, 12, 834-840.
[3]	A. Álvarez, A. Bansode, A. Urakawa, A. V. Bavykina, T. A. Wezendonk, M. Makkee, J. Gascon, F. Kapteijn, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 9804-9838.
[4]	M. D. Garba, M. Usman, S. Khan, F. Shehzad, A. Galadima, M. F. Ehsan, A. S. Ghanem, M. Humayun, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 104756.
[5]	H. Shin, K. U. Hansen, F. Jiao, Nat. Sustain., 2021, 4, 911-919.
[6]	P. Gao, L. Zhang, S. Li, Z. Zhou, Y. Sun, ACS Cent. Sci., 2020, 6, 1657-1670.
[7]	M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, A. Angelini, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1709-1742.
[8]	T. N. Do, C. You, J. Kim, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 169-184.
[9]	F. Zeng, C. Mebrahtu, X. Xi, L. Liao, J. Ren, J. Xie, H. J. Heeres, R. Palkovits, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 291, 120073.
[10]	I. A. Digdaya, I. Sullivan, M. Lin, L. Han, W.-H. Cheng, H. A. Atwater, C. Xiang, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 4412.
[11]	B. M. Tackett, E. Gomez, J. G. Chen, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 381-386.
[12]	Y. Jiang, R. Long, Y. Xiong, Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 7310-7326.
[13]	X. Jiang, X. Nie, X. Guo, C. Song, J. G. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 7984-8034.
[14]	Y. Li, L. Zeng, G. Pang, X. Wei, M. Wang, K. Cheng, J. Kang, J. M. Serra, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122299.
[15]	G. Tian, Z. Li, C. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Fan, K. Shen, H. Meng, N. Wang, H. Xiong, M. Zhao, X. Liang, L. Luo, L. Zhang, B. Yan, X. Chen, H.-J. Peng, F. Wei, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 3037.
[16]	X. Liu, M. Wang, H. Yin, J. Hu, K. Cheng, J. Kang, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 8303-8314.
[17]	M. Wang, L. Zheng, G. Wang, J. Cui, G.-L. Guan, Y.-T. Miao, J.-F. Wu, P. Gao, F. Yang, Y. Ling, X. Luo, Q. Zhang, G. Fu, K. Cheng, Y. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 14528-14538.
[18]	Z. Li, J. Wang, Y. Qu, H. Liu, C. Tang, S. Miao, Z. Feng, H. An, C. Li, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 8544-8548.
[19]	A. Ramirez, X. Gong, M. Caglayan, S. F. Nastase, E. Abou-Hamad, L. Gevers, L. Cavallo, A. Dutta Chowdhury, J. Gascon, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 5914.
[20]	I. Yarulina, A. D. Chowdhury, F. Meirer, B. M. Weckhuysen, J. Gascon, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 398-411.
[21]	J. Zhong, X. Yang, Z. Wu, B. Liang, Y. Huang, T. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 1385-1413.
[22]	C. Filosa, X. Gong, A. Bavykina, A. D. Chowdhury, J. M. R. Gallo, J. Gascon, Acc. Chem. Res., 2023, 56, 3492-3503.
[23]	J. Wei, Q. Ge, R. Yao, Z. Wen, C. Fang, L. Guo, H. Xu, J. Sun, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15174.
[24]	S. Jiang, M. Yi, Z. Liu, A. D. Chowdhury, Mater. Today Chem., 2025, 46, 102757.
[25]	S. Jiang, Z. Liu, A. D. Chowdhury, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2025, 15, 1096-1112.
[26]	Q. Yang, A. Skrypnik, A. Matvienko, H. Lund, M. Holena, E. V. Kondratenko, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 282, 119554.
[27]	S. Jiang, X. Gong, X. You, X. Zhang, Y. Li, A. D. Chowdhury, CCS Chem., 2024, 6, 2908-2925.
[28]	Y. Han, C. Fang, X. Ji, J. Wei, Q. Ge, J. Sun, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 12098-12108.
[29]	A. Ramirez, L. Gevers, A. Bavykina, S. Ould-Chikh, J. Gascon, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 9174-9182.
[30]	M. L. Cubeiro, H. Morales, M. R. Goldwasser, M. J. Pérez-Zurita, F. González-Jiménez, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2000, 69, 259-264.
[31]	V. P. Santos, T. A. Wezendonk, J. J. D. Jaén, A. I. Dugulan, M. A. Nasalevich, H.-U. Islam, A. Chojecki, S. Sartipi, X. Sun, A. A. Hakeem, A. C. J. Koeken, M. Ruitenbeek, T. Davidian, G. R. Meima, G. Sankar, F. Kapteijn, M. Makkee, J. Gascon, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 6451.
[32]	Z. Dong, J. Zhao, Y. Tian, B. Zhang, Y. Wu, Catalysts, 2020, 10, 455.
[33]	S. Hu, M. Liu, F. Ding, C. Song, G. Zhang, X. Guo, J. CO₂ Util., 2016, 15, 89-95.
[34]	J. Liu, A. Zhang, M. Liu, S. Hu, F. Ding, C. Song, X. Guo, J. CO₂ Util., 2017, 21, 100-107.
[35]	J. Liu, Y. Sun, X. Jiang, A. Zhang, C. Song, X. Guo, J. CO₂ Util., 2018, 25, 120-127.
[36]	Y. Liu, O. Ersen, C. Meny, F. Luck, C. Pham-Huu, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 1218-1239.
[37]	Y. Wang, S. Lin, M. Li, C. Zhu, H. Yang, P. Dong, M. Lu, W. Wang, J. Cao, Q. Liu, X. Feng, H. Hu, N. Tsubaki, M. Wu, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 340, 123211.
[38]	Z. Zhang, Y. Le, L. Jing, G. Huang, J. Kang, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 361, 124569.
[39]	C. C. Amoo, J. I. Orege, Q. Ge, J. Sun, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 471, 144606.
[40]	Q. Zhao, S. Huang, X. Han, J. Chen, J. Wang, A. Rykov, Y. Wang, M. Wang, J. Lv, X. Ma, Carbon, 2021, 173, 364-375.
[41]	S. A. Chernyak, A. S. Ivanov, D. N. Stolbov, S. V. Maksimov, K. I. Maslakov, P. A. Chernavskii, Y. A. Pokusaeva, A. E. Koklin, V. I. Bogdan, S. V. Savilov, Carbon, 2020, 168, 475-484.
[42]	G. Yu, B. Sun, Y. Pei, S. Xie, S. Yan, M. Qiao, K. Fan, X. Zhang, B. Zong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 935-937.
[43]	H. Qi, W. Si, Z. Xu, G. Wang, X. Liu, C. Lyu, B. Huang, N. Tsubaki, C. Xing, J. Sun, ChemSusChem, 2024, 17, e202400484.
[44]	K. Ahmad, S. Upadhyayula, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 2019, 38, 98-111.
[45]	L. Torrente-Murciano, D. Mattia, M. D. Jones, P. K. Plucinski, J. CO₂ Util., 2014, 6, 34-39.
[46]	H. Lv, H. Niu, X. Zhao, Y. Cai, F. Wu, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 286, 119940.
[47]	T. A. Wezendonk, V. P. Santos, M. A. Nasalevich, Q. S. E. Warringa, A. I. Dugulan, A. Chojecki, A. C. J. Koeken, M. Ruitenbeek, G. Meima, H.-U. Islam, G. Sankar, M. Makkee, F. Kapteijn, J. Gascon, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 3236-3247.
[48]	Y. Zhu, R. Zhu, Y. Xi, J. Zhu, G. Zhu, H. He, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 255, 117739.
[49]	W. Meng, B. C. A. D. Jong, H. van de Bovenkamp, G.-J. Boer, G. Leendert Bezemer, A. Iulian Dugulan, J. Xie, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 489, 151166.
[50]	J. Tu, M. Ding, T. Wang, L. Ma, Y. Xu, S. Kang, G. Zhang, Energy Procedia, 2017, 105, 82-87.
[51]	Y. Lu, Q. Yan, J. Han, B. Cao, J. Street, F. Yu, Fuel, 2017, 193, 369-384.
[52]	C. Zhu, M. Zhang, C. Huang, L. Zhong, K. Fang, New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 2413-2421.
[53]	M. Zhang, L. Zhang, M. Wang, G. Zhang, C. Song, X. Guo, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 68, 366-375.
[54]	S. Wang, T. Wu, J. Lin, J. Tian, Y. Ji, Y. Pei, S. Yan, M. Qiao, H. Xu, B. Zong, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 17825-17833.
[55]	S. Wang, T. Wu, J. Lin, Y. Ji, S. Yan, Y. Pei, S. Xie, B. Zong, M. Qiao, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 6389-6401.
[56]	T. Fu, R. Liu, J. Lv, Z. Li, Fuel Process. Technol., 2014, 122, 49-57.
[57]	X. Shen, C. Li, Y. Wang, M. Chen, Q. Wang, D. Liang, C. Cheng, J. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 505, 159889.
[58]	Z. Cai, X. Yu, P. Wang, H. Wu, R. Chong, L. Ren, T. Hu, X. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 70, 410-419.
[59]	L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Chen, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 415-416, 118-123.
[60]	J. M. Cho, B.-G. Kim, G. Y. Han, J. Sun, H.-K. Jeong, J. W. Bae, Fuel, 2020, 281, 118779.
[61]	C. C. Amoo, J. I. Orege, Q. Ge, J. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 340, 123193.
[62]	X. Zhang, X. Gong, E. Abou-Hamad, H. Zhou, X. You, J. Gascon, A. Dutta Chowdhury, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, 1-11.
[63]	G. Näfe, M.-A. López-Martínez, M. Dyballa, M. Hunger, Y. Traa, T. Hirth, E. Klemm, J. Catal., 2015, 329, 413-424.
[64]	J. Im, H. Shin, H. Jang, H. Kim, M. Choi, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3370.
[65]	C. Wang, E. Guan, L. Wang, X. Chu, Z. Wu, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Jiang, L. Zhang, X. Meng, B. C. Gates, F.-S. Xiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 8482-8488.
[66]	S. Wang, Z.-J. Zhao, X. Chang, J. Zhao, H. Tian, C. Yang, M. Li, Q. Fu, R. Mu, J. Gong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 7668-7672.
[67]	H. Liang, S. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Zhou, L. Xia, Y. Sun, H. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 71, 146-157.

碳包覆铁基催化剂合成策略对CO₂改进费托合成性能的调控机制研究

Linking catalyst synthesis strategies to CO₂-modified Fischer-Tropsch performance in iron-carbon systems

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 8

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	邹洁琪, 何迁, 刘雷, 赵斌彬, 董晋湘. CuWO_x纳米岛原子置换精准构筑Pt-O-W活性位高效催化甘油氢解制1,3-丙二醇[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 347-358.
[2]	刘芷瑶, 刘唐康, 秦川, 刘国亮, 郑安民. 氧化锆介导界面催化在CO₂加氢反应中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 1-24.
[3]	Alexey S. Galushko, Ilya V. Chepkasov, Ruslan R. Shaydullin, Daniil A. Boiko, Alexander G. Kvashnin, Artem M. Abakumov, Valentine P. Ananikov. 活性气体调控金属纳米结构核性并提升催化活性[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 324-336.
[4]	Wonjoong Yoon, Malayil Gopalan Sibi, Jaehoon Kim. 三床层Na-FeAlOₓ/Zn-HZSM-5@SiO₂催化CO₂直接加氢稳定生成芳烃[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 330-346.
[5]	张雪晴, 吉叶伍沙, 张煜华, 李金林, 王立. 高效碳转化的铁基费-托合成催化剂研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 4-21.
[6]	李士宁, 姚俊韬, 庞淑馨, 张景彭, 李诗颖, 刘志成, 韩璐, 樊卫斌, 朱卡克, 朱贻安. 不互溶Ag提高Co/YSZ高压甲烷干重整催化剂稳定性研究[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 82-96.
[7]	吴剑峰, 梁丽烨, 车政, 苗宇婷, 丑凌军. 双金属氧化物催化CO₂加氢制备甲醇: 最新进展和挑战[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 62-78.
[8]	胡晓春, 陶龙刚, 雷坤, 孙志强, 谭明务. 揭示TiO₂相效应对Pt单原子催化剂高效CO₂转化的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 186-195.
[9]	赵子昂, 姜淼, 李存耀, 李怡蕙, 朱何俊, 林荣和, 袁慎峰, 严丽, 丁云杰. 费托合成与多相氢甲酰化技术耦合制高值化学品的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 16-38.
[10]	庹杰, 盛振腾, 龚贤晨, 杨琪, 吴鹏, 徐浩. ZnCeZrO_x/MCM-22择形催化二氧化碳加氢耦合甲苯甲基化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 174-185.
[11]	任宪轩, Rozemarijn D. E. Krösschell, 门卓武, 王鹏, Ivo A. W. Filot, Emiel J. M. Hensen. K对Hägg碳化物逆水煤气变换反应作用的理论研究[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 289-300.
[12]	王一潮, 张磊磊, 潘晓丽, 王爱琴, 张涛. 碳化铁催化氢气气氛下苯甲醇脱氧偶联制备联苄类化学品[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 71(4): 179-186.
[13]	梁昊, 张书南, 张若楠, 周浩志, 夏林, 孙予罕, 王慧. FeTi强相互作用促进CO₂高效加氢制低碳烯烃[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 71(4): 146-157.
[14]	刘青, 尚进, 刘振东. 塑料废弃物升级回收时代的分子筛催化剂: 迈向循环经济与可持续发展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 71(4): 54-69.
[15]	梁超安, 曾波, 冯保林, 史会兵, 张凤岐, 刘建华, 何林, 丁玉晓, 夏春谷. 烯烃氢甲酰化的钴基多相催化体系[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 70(3): 115-141.