混合价态MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr异质结中全空间电场介导的电荷迁移用于高效光催化降解有机污染物

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65045-0

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 86: 338-349.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65045-0

混合价态MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr异质结中全空间电场介导的电荷迁移用于高效光催化降解有机污染物

周彪^a^,^*(), 陈建伟^c, 种亚楠^b^,^*(), 严克友^c^,^*()

^a 湖北师范大学城市与环境学院, 湖北黄石 435500
^b 大湾区大学物质科学学院, 东莞市先进材料与大型科学设施交叉科学重点实验室, 广东东莞 523000
^c 华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 发光材料与器件国家重点实验室, 广东广州 510000

收稿日期:2025-10-09 接受日期:2026-01-26 出版日期:2026-07-05 发布日期:2026-06-12
通讯作者: ^*电子信箱: Zhoubiao93@hbnu.edu.cn (周彪),
chongyn@gbu.edu.cn (种亚楠),
kyyan@scut.edu.cn (严克友).
基金资助:
湖北省自然科学青年基金(2025AFB270);湖北省教育厅中青年人才项目基金(Q20242502);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2024A1515110037)

Full-space electric field-mediated charge migration in mixed-valence MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr heterostructures for efficient photocatalytic pollutant removal

Biao Zhou^a^,^*(), Jianwei Chen^c, Yanan Chong^b^,^*(), Keyou Yan^c^,^*()

^a College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435500, Hubei, China
^b Dongguan Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Science for Advanced Materials and Large-Scale Scientific Facilities, School of Physical Sciences, Great Bay University, Dongguan 523000, Guangdong, China
^c School of Environment and Energy, State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China

Received:2025-10-09 Accepted:2026-01-26 Online:2026-07-05 Published:2026-06-12
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2025AFB270);Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education(Q20242502);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2024A1515110037)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着工业化与城市化进程加快, 有机废水的处理已成为可持续发展和人类健康面临的关键问题. 半导体光催化降解技术是一种高效、绿色的污染物去除策略, 但其实际应用仍面临光生电荷载流子复合快、活性位点不足以及吸附与光催化过程耦合弱等挑战. 金属-有机框架(MOF)材料因其可调的孔隙结构、高比表面积和功能多样性, 在光催化领域展现出巨大潜力. 然而, MOF材料内部及界面缓慢的电荷传输动力学限制了其降解效率. 因此, 开发能够协同增强电荷分离、最大化活性位点暴露并集成吸附-光催化过程的MOF基异质结构体系至关重要.

本文通过连续的原位水解与还原策略, 合理构建了晶面工程化的混合价态MIL-88A(Fe^Ⅱ/Fe^Ⅲ)@BiOBr异质结构(m-MIL-88A@BiOBr). 其中, 暴露(100)晶面的m-MIL-88A纳米棒被超薄BiOBr纳米片(主要暴露(001)晶面)包覆. 研究表明, Fe(Ⅱ)的引入不仅增强了m-MIL-88A体相内的电荷迁移率, 还使其功函数较原始MIL-88A降低了0.17 eV, 从而将界面电场强度提升了2.2倍. 这种增强的体相电荷迁移与强化的界面电场, 与BiOBr自身(001)与(110)晶面间固有的体电场协同作用, 共同构建了全空间电场, 实现了光生电子的定向迁移. 优化后的m-MIL-88A@BiOBr-3催化剂表现出优异的卡马西平(CBZ)光催化降解性能, 其反应速率常数高达0.023 min^-1, 分别是原始MIL-88A和BiOBr的6.99倍和2.15倍. 此外, 该催化剂展现出广泛的环境适用性, 可高效矿化四环素、偶氮染料等多种结构各异的污染物. 通过X-射线光电子能谱、紫外光电子能谱、开尔文探针力显微镜和密度泛函理论计算等系统表征, 证实了混合价态Fe^Ⅱ/Fe^Ⅲ簇建立的电子传递链, 强化了界面内建电场, 并揭示了电子遵循BiOBr-(001) → BiOBr-(110) → m-MIL-88A-(100)的Type-II路径进行全空间电场介导的定向转移. 机理研究表明, •OH和•O₂⁻是降解过程中的主要活性物种, 并基于福井函数计算提出了CBZ可能的降解路径.

综上, 本工作通过价态调控与晶面工程的双重策略, 在MOF基异质结中实现了体电场与界面电场的协同调制, 为设计具有高效定向电荷转移能力的光催化体系提供了新思路, 对推动MOF基材料在环境修复中的实际应用具有重要意义.

关键词: 金属-有机框架, BiOBr, 混合价态, 全空间电场, 有机污染物

Abstract:

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offer an ideal platform for constructing heterostructures to catalyze organic pollutant degradation. However, sluggish charge transfer dynamics within the bulk and at interfacial regions limit removal efficiency. Herein, we engineered a full-space electric field in BiOBr-nanosheet-coated mixed-valence MIL-88A(Fe^II/Fe^III) (m-MIL-88A@BiOBr) heterostructures via charge polarization to overcome this limitation. Specifically, this full-space electric field originates from the synergistic interplay of a bulk electric field (BEF) and an interfacial electric field (IEF), collectively driving the directional flow of photogenerated electrons. Simultaneously, mixed-valent Fe^II/Fe^III metalloclusters establish electron-transfer chains, enhancing charge mobility and IEF intensity. The optimized m-MIL-88A@BiOBr-3 catalyst exhibited exceptional photocatalytic degradation rate constant of 0.023 min⁻¹ for carbamazepine (CBZ) removal, surpassing pristine MIL-88A and BiOBr by factors of 6.99 and 2.15, respectively. Notably, m-MIL-88A@BiOBr-3 demonstrates broad environmental applicability, efficiently mineralizing structurally diverse pollutants (tetracycline, azo dyes, etc.). This work provides critical insights for regulating charge transport in MOF-based heterojunctions.

Key words: Metal-organic frameworks, BiOBr, Mixed-valence, Full-space electric field, Organic pollutants

周彪, 陈建伟, 种亚楠, 严克友. 混合价态MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr异质结中全空间电场介导的电荷迁移用于高效光催化降解有机污染物[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86: 338-349.

Biao Zhou, Jianwei Chen, Yanan Chong, Keyou Yan. Full-space electric field-mediated charge migration in mixed-valence MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr heterostructures for efficient photocatalytic pollutant removal[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 86: 338-349.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65045-0

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V86/I7/338

图/表 5

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic illustration for the synthetic procedure of m-MIL-88A@BiOBr heterostructures. (b) SEM image of m-MIL-88A. TEM (c) and HAADF-STEM (d) images of m-MIL-88A@BiOBr. HRTEM (e) and the related SAED (f) images of the selected area A1. (g) HRTEM image of the selected area A2. (h) Corresponding elemental mapping of m-MIL-88A@BiOBr.

Fig. 2. XPS spectra of Fe 2p (a), Mössbauer spectrum (b), UPS spectra of the cutoff region (c), and calculated internal electric field intensity (assuming the intensity of MIL-88A@BiOBr to be “1”) (d) of as-prepared samples. TDOS (e), simulated charge density, and Barder charge analysis (f) of MIL-88A and m-MIL-88A (the cyan and yellow represent regions of electron depletion and accumulation, respectively). Atomic force microscopy images (g,h), KPFM images (i,j), and corresponding line profiles (k,l) of MIL-88A and m-MIL-88A.

Fig. 3. Photocurrent-time response profiles (a), EIS Nyquist impedance plots (b), Time-resolved PL spectra (c), UV-vis DRS spectra (d), and Mott-Schottky plots (e) of as-prepared samples. (f) Schematic energy-band diagram of m-MIL-88A and BiOBr.

Fig. 4. Adsorption kinetics (a), photocatalytic degradation of TC after adsorption in the dark for 30 min (b), the first-order kinetic curves (c) of BiOBr, MIL-88A, m-MIL-88A, MIL-88A@BiOBr and m-MIL-88A@BiOBr. Influence of incident wavelength on the TC removal efficiency (d), the photodegradation performance under different organic pollutants (e), and the reusability experiments (f) of m-MIL-88A@BiOBr. (g) Electronic structure of the optimized HOMO, LUMO and ESP distribution of CBZ, CIP, TC, and RhB molecule.

Fig. 5. (a) Radical trapping experiments of m-MIL-88A@BiOBr. EPR spectra of DMPO-•OH (b) and DMPO-•O2− (c) for m-MIL-88A and m-MIL-88A@BiOBr. In-situ XPS spectra of Fe 2p (d) and Bi 4f (e) under dark or illumination, (f) Full-space electric field-mediated Type II charge transfer mechanism over m-MIL-88A@BiOBr. (g) Molecular structure of CBZ, computed Fukui index (f 0) distribution, and proposed degradation pathways based on reactive site analysis. (h) Natural population analysis charge distribution of CBZ in various electronic states and the corresponding computed f 0 values.

参考文献

[1]	Z. Lian, F. Gao, H. Xiao, D. Luo, M. Li, D. Fang, Y. Yang, J. Zi, H. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202318927.
[2]	Y. Wang, D. Li, X. Ge, J. Yu, Y. Zhao, Y. Bu, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2402935.
[3]	X. Wu, J. Li, R. Zhong, S. Liu, F. Huang, Q. Yang, B. Zhang, X. Wang, F. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2405868.
[4]	B. Zhou, K. Fan, Y. Chong, S. Xu, J. Wei, J. Wei, A. A. Sergeev, K. S. Wong, T. Li, G. Chen, D. Ye, K. Yan, ACS Energy Lett., 2024, 9, 1743-1752.
[5]	Y. Luo, A. Zheng, J. Li, Y. Han, M. Xue, L. Zhang, Z. Yin, C. Xie, Z. Chen, L. Ji, Z. Hong, X. Xie, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 457, 141228.
[6]	S. Qi, K. Zhu, T. Xu, H. Zhang, X. Guo, J. Wang, F. Zhang, X. Zong, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2403328.
[7]	C. Chen, L. Shen, B. Wang, X. Lu, S. Raza, J. Xu, B. Li, H. Lin, B. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2025, 54, 2208-2245.
[8]	S. Ren, X. Wen, T. Lu, H. Zhang, Z. Lou, X. Xu, J. Li, J. Yu, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 514, 163323.
[9]	T. D. Doan, N.-N. Vu, T. L. G. Hoang, P. Nguyen-Tri, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2025, 523, 216298.
[10]	F. Yu, X. Jing, Y. Wang, M. Sun, C. Duan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 24849-24853.
[11]	X. Liao, F. Wang, F. Wang, Y. Cai, Y. Yao, B.-T. Teng, Q. Hao, S. Lu, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 259, 118064.
[12]	J.-D. Xiao, Q. Shang, Y. Xiong, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, S.-H. Yu, H.-L. Jiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 9389-9393.
[13]	A. Gómez-Avilés, J. Bedia, C. Belver, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 378, 125566.
[14]	R. Yuan, J. Qiu, C. Yue, C. Shen, D. Li, C. Zhu, F. Liu, A. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 401, 126020.
[15]	H. Shi, C. Li, L. Wang, W. Wang, X. Meng, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 424, 127711.
[16]	Q. Li, H. Zhou, Z. Li, A. Liu, E. Wang, Y. Wu, X. Tang, H. Du, L. Jin, H. Zhu, B. Ni, Q. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2025, 486, 137051.
[17]	X. Chu, S. Liu, B.-B. Luan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xi, L.-H. Shao, F.-M. Zhang, Y.-Q. Lan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202422940.
[18]	X.-M. Cheng, X.-Y. Dao, S.-Q. Wang, J. Zhao, W.-Y. Sun, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 650-658.
[19]	H. Lei, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, Y. Ye, Z. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Chen, Y. Liu, M. Hong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202509572.
[20]	X.-M. Cheng, J. Zhao, W.-Y. Sun, EnergyChem, 2022, 4, 100084.
[21]	Y. Xi, W. Chen, W. Dong, Z. Fan, K. Wang, Y. Shen, G. Tu, S. Zhong, S. Bai, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 39491-39500.
[22]	Z.-A. Huang, Q. Sun, K. Lv, Z. Zhang, M. Li, B. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 164, 420-427.
[23]	Z. Yang, X. Xia, L. Shao, L. wang, Y. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 410, 128454.
[24]	L. Xie, T. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Zhu, Z. Liu, M. Liu, J. Wang, L. Zhang, T. Du, C. Yang, M. Zhu, J. Wang, J. Clean. Prod., 2022, 359, 131808.
[25]	H. Chen, Y. Liu, T. Cai, W. Dong, L. Tang, X. Xia, L. Wang, T. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 28791-28800.
[26]	G. Zhou, B. Lei, F. Dong, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 4791-4798.
[27]	M. Shi, G. Li, J. Li, X. Jin, X. Tao, B. Zeng, E. A. Pidko, R. Li, C. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 6590-6595.
[28]	X. Cao, A. Huang, C. Liang, H.-C. Chen, T. Han, R. Lin, Q. Peng, Z. Zhuang, R. Shen, H.-M. Chen, Y. Yu, C. Chen, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 3386-3397.
[29]	Y. Zhang, J. Zhou, X. Chen, L. Wang, W. Cai, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 369, 745-757.
[30]	C. Gao, Y. Su, X. Quan, V. K. Sharma, S. Chen, H. Yu, Y. Zhang, J. Niu, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 276, 119016.
[31]	T. Yang, D. Yu, D. Wang, T. Yang, Z. Li, M. Wu, M. Petru, J. Crittenden, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 286, 119859.
[32]	J. Tang, J. Wang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018, 52, 5367-5377.
[33]	B. Zhou, X. Xu, M. Li, L. Wu, S. Xu, L. Yuan, Y. Chong, W. Xie, P. Liu, D. Ye, G. I. N. Waterhouse, Y. Qiu, G. Chen, T. Shi, K. Yan, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 468, 143754.
[34]	E. D. Bloch, L. J. Murray, W. L. Queen, S. Chavan, S. N. Maximoff, J. P. Bigi, R. Krishna, V. K. Peterson, F. Grandjean, G. J. Long, B. Smit, S. Bordiga, C. M. Brown, J. R. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 14814-14822.
[35]	B. Zhou, S. Xu, L. Wu, M. Li, Y. Chong, Y. Qiu, G. Chen, Y. Zhao, C. Feng, D. Ye, K. Yan, Small, 2023, 19, 2302058.
[36]	P. Hu, G. Liang, B. Zhu, W. Macyk, J. Yu, F. Xu, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 12623-12633.
[37]	F. Li, Y. Xie, Y. Hu, M. Long, Y. Zhang, J. Xu, M. Qin, X. Lu, M. Liu, ACS Energy Lett., 2020, 5, 1422-1429.
[38]	T. Kanata, M. Matsunaga, H. Takakura, Y. Hamakawa, T. Nishino, Proc. SPIE, 1990, 1286, 56-65.
[39]	C. Yang, S. Wan, B. Zhu, J. Yu, S. Cao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202208438.
[40]	Z. Li, L. Xu, Z. Yin, J. Ma, X. Dong, S. Wang, Z. Song, J. Qiu, Y. Li, Adv. Sci., 2025, 12, 2412214.
[41]	J. Jing, J. Yang, W. Li, Z. Wu, Y. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2106807.
[42]	B. Zhou, M. Waqas, B. Yang, K. Xiao, S. Wang, C. Zhu, J. Li, J. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 506, 145004.
[43]	Y. S. Ho, G. McKay, Process. Biochem., 1999, 34, 451-465.
[44]	H. Li, C. Shan, B. Pan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018, 52, 2197-2205.
[45]	H. Li, H. Ji, J. Liu, W. Liu, F. Li, Z. Shen, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 328, 122481.
[46]	T. Lu, F. Chen, J. Comput. Chem., 2012, 33, 580-592.
[47]	T. Lu, J. Chem. Phys., 2024, 161, 082503.
[48]	X.-Y. Lou, G. Zhang, M.-H. Li, Y.-W. Yang, Nano Lett., 2023, 23, 1961-1969.
[49]	C. Huang, L. Yang, N. Geng, K. Sun, T. Yang, M. Pan, T. Liu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2025, 15, 2500220.
[50]	X. Li, K. Li, D. Ding, J. Yan, C. Wang, S. A. C. Carabineiro, Y. Liu, K. Lv, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 309, 123054.

混合价态MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr异质结中全空间电场介导的电荷迁移用于高效光催化降解有机污染物

Full-space electric field-mediated charge migration in mixed-valence MIL-88A(Fe)@BiOBr heterostructures for efficient photocatalytic pollutant removal

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	邢赟, 刘磊, 孔文晶, 田俊泰, 刘鹏, 杨臣, 付名利, 叶代启. 铈活化泡沫金属载体实现高效乙酸丁酯氧化: 内在氧化还原循环与界面电子转移的双重作用[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 390-400.
[2]	曹腾飞, 徐全龙, 张军, 王升高, 狄廷敏, 邓泉荣. 构建S型g-C₃N₄/BiOBr异质结以增强光催化合成过氧化氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 118-129.
[3]	李世杰, 游常俊, 杨方, 梁桂杰, 庄春强, 李鑫. 界面Mo-S化学键调控Mn_0.5Cd_0.5S/Bi₂MoO₆ S型异质结增强光催化去除新兴有机污染物[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 68(1): 259-271.
[4]	谷苗莉, 杨祎, 程蓓, 张留洋, 肖鹏, 陈涛. 利用电荷分离调控S型异质结光催化氧化产物选择性[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 59(4): 185-194.
[5]	宋宁, 江吉周, 洪士欢, 王赟, 李春梅, 董红军. 以金属有机骨架为源制备单原子电催化剂用于能量转换的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 59(4): 38-81.
[6]	李世杰, 王春春, 董珂欣, 张鹏, 陈晓波, 李鑫. 新型MIL-101(Fe)/BiOBr S型异质催化剂用于高效光催化降解抗生素和还原六价铬: 光催化性能分析和光催化机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 101-112.
[7]	郑子叶, 田爽, 冯玉晓, 赵珊, 李鑫, 王曙光, 何作利. 光催化耦合技术在废水处理中的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 54(11): 88-136.
[8]	Ernest Pahuyo Delmo, 王忆安, 王菁, 朱尚乾, 李铁怀, 秦雪苹, 田一博, 赵青蓝, Juhee Jang, 王一诺, 谷猛, 张莉莉, 邵敏华. 金属有机框架-离子液体混合催化剂用于电化学还原二氧化碳生成甲烷[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1687-1696.
[9]	吕奉磊, 花伟, 邬慧蓉, 孙浩, 邓昭, 彭扬. 金属-有机配位结构与界面调控电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(6): 1417-1432.
[10]	赵君泽, 薛敏, 季梦夏, 王彬, 王雨, 李英杰, 陈自然, 李华明, 夏杰祥. “电子集流体”Bi₁₉S₂₇Br₃/BiOBr复合材料的制备及其增强光催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(5): 1324-1330.
[11]	陈男男, 贾雪梅, 何恒, 林海莉, 郭敏娜, 曹静, 张金锋, 陈士夫. BiOBr/Ni₂P/g-C₃N₄体系中用Ni₂P电子桥加速S型体系光生载流子分离[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 276-287.
[12]	张龙, 杨懿, 李远志, 武继春, 吴绍文, 谭鑫, 胡倩倩. 二氧化铈-铈掺杂锰氧化物纳米复合物高效紫外-可见-红外光热催化净化乙酸乙酯[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 379-390.
[13]	张彬, 胡晓云, 刘恩周, 樊君. 2D/2D BiOBr/g-C₃N₄ S型异质结光催化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(9): 1519-1529.
[14]	赵小雪, 李金择, 李鑫, 霍鹏伟, 施伟东. 金属有机框架(MOFs)基光催化剂的设计及其在太阳能燃料生产和污染物降解领域的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(6): 872-903.
[15]	肖娟, 陈军伟, 欧祖翘, 赖俊杭, 俞同文, 王毅. 基于N-掺杂碳包覆Fe₃N复合材料的高效异相电芬顿降解有机物[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(6): 953-962.