强界面电场促进电荷分离增强S型光催化剂的水氧化性能

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64757-7

催化学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 77: 199-209.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64757-7

强界面电场促进电荷分离增强S型光催化剂的水氧化性能

谭新悦^a^,^b^,^c^,¹, 张明慧^a^,¹, 白洋^b^,^c, 刘小鱼^b^,^c, 景建芳^a^,^*(), 苏毅国^a^,^*()

^a内蒙古大学化学化工学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010021
^b包头稀土新材料技术研发中心, 内蒙古包头 014030
^c鹿城实验室, 内蒙古包头 014030

收稿日期:2025-04-24 接受日期:2025-06-06 出版日期:2025-10-18 发布日期:2025-10-05
通讯作者: *电子信箱: jingjf@imu.edu.cn (景建芳),cesyg@imu.edu.cn (苏毅国).
作者简介:¹共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22309093);国家自然科学基金(22166027);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2023QN02001);内蒙古自治区高校重点科研项目(NJZZ23093)

Boosting photocatalytic water oxidation via interfacial electric field-mediated charge separation in S-scheme photocatalyst

Xinyue Tan^a^,^b^,^c^,¹, Minghui Zhang^a^,¹, Yang Bai^b^,^c, Xiaoyu Liu^b^,^c, Jianfang Jing^a^,^*(), Yiguo Su^a^,^*()

^aCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, Inner Mongolia, China
^bBaotou Rare Earth New Material Technology R & D Center, Baotou 014030, Inner Mongolia, China
^cLucheng Laboratory, Baotou 014030, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2025-04-24 Accepted:2025-06-06 Online:2025-10-18 Published:2025-10-05
Contact: *E-mail: jingjf@imu.edu.cn (J. Jing), cesyg@imu.edu.cn (Y. Su).
About author:¹Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22309093);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22166027);Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(2023QN02001);Research Program of science and technology at Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(NJZZ23093)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水氧化反应是光催化全解水的关键步骤, 其缓慢的动力学和高过电势成为限制光解水效率的主要瓶颈. 有机半导体具有宽光谱吸收和结构可调优势, 但高激子结合能导致电荷分离效率低, 严重制约了其催化性能. 苝酰亚胺超分子(PDINH)因其优异的光热稳定性和较深的价带电势, 展现出良好的光催化产氧活性, 但仍受限于较低的电荷分离效率. 解决该问题的关键在于提供强驱动力促进电荷分离. S型异质结通过保留还原型光催化剂的电子和氧化型光催化剂的空穴, 实现氧化还原反应的空间分离, 同时界面处的内建电场和能带弯曲可有效驱动电荷的定向迁移, 从而增强催化活性. 因此, 利用S型异质结构筑内建电场驱动电荷分离是本文的主要研究思路.

与传统四氧化三钴(Co₃O₄)助催化剂的单一功能不同, 本文通过精确调控Co₃O₄纳米颗粒的尺寸, 利用其适宜的导带位置作为还原型半导体组分, 采用静电自组装策略与氧化型PDINH构建S型异质结. 该结构有效促进了电荷的定向传输, 实现了可见光驱动的高效光催化产氧. X射线衍射、高分辨透射电镜、X射线光电子能谱及能量色散X射线光谱等表征结果表明, Co₃O₄与PDINH之间形成了紧密的界面接触, 成功证实了PDINH/Co₃O₄异质结的构建. 为明确PDINH/Co₃O₄异质结的电荷转移路径, 首先通过莫特-肖特基测试和紫外-可见漫反射光谱系统表征了PDINH与Co₃O₄的能带结构. 基于原位开尔文探针力显微镜测试获得的接触电势差数据, 精确测定了两组分费米能级的相对位置. 结合原位X射线光电子能谱和飞秒瞬态吸收光谱分析结果, 最终证实了S型电荷转移机制, 即光生电子从PDINH的导带迁移至Co₃O₄的价带, 与其光生空穴复合, 同时形成了由Co₃O₄指向PDINH的界面电场. 此外, 通过表面光电压和表面电荷密度分析证实, PDINH/Co₃O₄异质结的界面电场强度分别达到单一PDINH和Co₃O₄的4.1倍和53.2倍. 瞬态光电压、荧光发射、光电化学测试和电子顺磁共振等系列表征手段表明, 该强界面电场显著促进了电荷的分离与传输效率. 基于S型电荷转移机制既能实现PDINH内部的空间电荷分离, 又可保留强氧化性空穴的特性. 我们对PDINH/Co₃O₄的光催化产氧性能进行了系统研究, 通过优化催化剂比例、用量等反应参数, 最终获得29.26 mmol g^-1 g^-1的水氧化反应速率, 较单一PDINH提升了8.2倍. 在420 nm照射下表观量子效率达到6.66%. 经过21小时连续循环测试后, PDINH/Co₃O₄仍保持相对较高的活性, 表明该异质结具有优异的催化稳定性. 最后, 密度泛函理论计算的水氧化反应各步骤的吉布斯自由能变化表明, *OH中间体的形成是产氧反应的决速步, 而PDINH/Co₃O₄异质结显著降低了*OH形成能垒, 从而提升了水氧化反应动力学.

综上所述, 本文通过构建有机/无机S型异质结, 成功建立了强界面电场, 实现了可见光驱动的高效光催化产氧. 通过多种原位光谱表征与理论计算相结合, 系统阐明了S型电荷转移动力学机制, 揭示了异质结结构与产氧活性之间的构效关系. 该研究不仅为S型异质结在光催化水氧化领域的应用提供了范例, 更为设计高效太阳能-化学能转换体系提供了重要的理论指导.

关键词: 光催化, 氧化反应, 界面电场, S型异质结, 苝酰亚胺

Abstract:

The major challenge in photocatalytic water splitting lies in water oxidation reactions, which still suffer from poor charge separation. This study overcame inefficient charge separation by establishing a robust interfacial electric field through the electrostatic-driven assembly of Co₃O₄ nanoparticles with a perylene imide supramolecule (PDINH). The well-aligned band structures and intimate interfacial contact in the PDINH/Co₃O₄ heterostructure create an enhanced interfacial electric field that is 4.1- and 53.2-fold stronger than those of individual PDINH and Co₃O₄, thus promoting directional charge separation and transfer. Moreover, S-scheme charge transfer strongly preserves the oxidative holes in PDINH to drive efficient water oxidation reactions. Consequently, PDINH/Co₃O₄ composite achieves a photocatalytic oxygen evolution rate of 29.26 mmol g^-1 h^-1 under visible light irradiation, 8.2-fold improvement over pristine PDINH, with an apparent quantum yield of 6.66% at 420 nm. This study provides fundamental insights into interfacial electric field control for the development of high-performance organic photocatalysts for efficient water oxidation.

Key words: Photocatalysis, Oxygen evolution, Interfacial electric field, S-scheme heterojunction, Perylene imide

谭新悦, 张明慧, 白洋, 刘小鱼, 景建芳, 苏毅国. 强界面电场促进电荷分离增强S型光催化剂的水氧化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 77: 199-209.

Xinyue Tan, Minghui Zhang, Yang Bai, Xiaoyu Liu, Jianfang Jing, Yiguo Su. Boosting photocatalytic water oxidation via interfacial electric field-mediated charge separation in S-scheme photocatalyst[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 77: 199-209.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64757-7

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2025/V77/I10/199

图/表 5

Fig. 1. TEM images of PDINH (a) and Co3O4 (inset is particle size distribution) (b). (c) HRTEM image of Co3O4. (d) TEM image of PDINH/Co3O4 (inset is HRTEM images of Co3O4). (e) XRD patterns of PDINH, Co3O4, and PDINH/Co3O4. (f) XPS high resolution spectra of Co 2p for Co3O4 and PDINH/Co3O4. (g) EDX elemental mapping of PDINH/Co3O4 high-resolution.

Fig. 2. (a) Contact potential differences (CPD) between the sample and Kelvin probe. (b) Schematics of the band structures of PDINH and Co3O4 before contact. (c) Energy band bending and interfacial electric field formation. In situ light irradiation XPS Co 2p (d) and N 1s (e) spectra of PDINH/Co3O4. (f) Differential charge density map of PDINH/Co3O4. Isosurface value is 0.02 a.u.; Charge accumulation and depletion are depicted in blue and green, respectively. (g) SPV spectra. (h) Surface charge density measured through the electrochemical method. (i) Relative interfacial electric field intensity of PDINH, Co3O4 and PDINH/Co3O4. CB: conduction band; VB: valence band; FL: Fermi energy level; VL: vacuum energy level.

Fig. 3. Fs-TAS of PDINH (a) and PDINH/Co3O4 (b) with a 430 nm pump excitation. Time profiles and the corresponding decay kinetics of normalized transient absorption for PDINH (c) and PDINH/Co3O4 (d). Inset tables are fitted with time constants of photogenerated holes and electrons.

Fig. 4. Surface potential mapping of Co3O4 (a), PDINH (b), and PDINH/Co3O4 (c). (d) Transient photovoltage spectra. Inset is the corresponding TPV kinetic fitting curves. (e) Normalized open-circuit potential decay profiles upon illumination termination. (f) Steady-state PL spectra. (g) EPR spectra of PDI anion radicals. (h) EPR spectra of ?OH radicals. (i) Electrochemical impedance spectra. Inset is the equivalent circuit impedance model.

Fig. 5. (a) Time-course plots of photocatalytic oxygen production. (b) Photocatalytic oxygen production rate of PDINH, Co3O4 and PDINH/Co3O4. (c) AQY and absorption spectrum of PDINH/Co3O4. (d) Comparison of photocatalytic oxygen evolution performances of PDINH/Co3O4 with other reported materials. (e) Cyclic experiment of PDINH/Co3O4. (f) Computational geometry models of PDINH and PDINH/Co3O4. (g) Gibbs free energy profiles of the O2 formation pathway. Insets are the corresponding intermediate adsorption models.

参考文献

[1]	Z. Wang, C. Li, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48, 2109-2125.
[2]	Z. Zhang, X. Chen, H. Zhang, W. Liu, W. Zhu, Y. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2020, 32, 1907746.
[3]	W. Li, Z. Wei, Y. Sheng, J. Xu, Y. Ren, J. Jing, J. Yang, J. Li, Y. Zhu, ACS Energy Lett., 2023, 8, 2652-2660.
[4]	R. Sun, X. Hu, C. Shu, L. Zheng, S. Wang, X. Wang, B. Tan, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 55, 159-170.
[5]	X. Xu, Y. Cheng, X. Zhu, J. Huang, B. Zhu, J. Meng, J. Li, G. Jing, L. Zheng, S. Yang, C. Sun, H. Li, R. Yuan, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 361, 124589.
[6]	K. Liu, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Xu, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, K. Shi, N. Wang, S. Chen, G. Ma, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 10138-10147.
[7]	L. Yan, G. Dong, X. Huang, Y. Zhang, Y. Bi, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 345, 123682.
[8]	B. Mishra, A. Alam, A. Chakraborty, B. Kumbhakar, S. Ghosh, P. Pachfule, A. Thomas, Adv. Mater., 2024, 2413118.
[9]	S. Navalón, A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. Álvaro, B. Ferrer, H. García, Chem. Rev., 2023, 123, 445-490.
[10]	Z.-A. Lan, Y. Fang, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 470-474.
[11]	J. Jing, J. Yang, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11, 2101392.
[12]	X. Zhu, Y. Jia, Y. Liu, J. Xu, H. He, S. Wang, Y. Shao, Y. Zhai, Y. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202405962.
[13]	J. Jing, J. Li, Y. Su, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122284.
[14]	Y. Jin, X. Liu, C. Qu, C. Li, H. Wang, X. Zhan, X. Cao, X. Li, B. Yu, Q. Zhang, D. Qi, J. Jiang, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 57, 171-183.
[15]	D. Liu, X. Yang, P. Chen, X. Zhang, G. Chen, Q. Guo, H. Hou, Y. Li, Adv. Mater., 2023, 35, 2300655.
[16]	R. Shen, C. Huang, L. Hao, G. Liang, P. Zhang, Q. Yue, X. Li, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 2457.
[17]	F. Würthner, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1564-1579.
[18]	D. Liu, J. Wang, X. Bai, R. Zong, Y. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 7284-7290.
[19]	Y. Yang, J. Geng, D. Wang, C. Li, X. Zhang, C. Wen, Q. Song, J. Wang, G. Zhu, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 365, 124962.
[20]	Y. Sheng, W. Li, Y. Zhu, L. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 298, 120585.
[21]	Y. Sheng, W. Li, L. Xu, Y. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2102354.
[22]	H. Lin, J. Wang, J. Zhao, Y. Zhuang, B. Liu, Y. Zhu, H. Jia, K. Wu, J. Shen, X. Fu, X. Zhang, J. Long, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202117645.
[23]	H. Wang, S. Jin, X. Zhang, Y. Xie, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 22828-22839.
[24]	M. Z. Rahman, T. Edvinsson, J. Gascon, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2022, 6, 243-258.
[25]	Y. Ma, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, B. Cheng, L. Zhang, J. Materiomics, 2025, 11, 100978.
[26]	J. Cai, C. Cheng, B. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, Acta Phys.Chim. Sin., 2025, 41, 100084.
[27]	Y. Zhu, Y. Zhuang, L. Wang, H. Tang, X. Meng, X. She, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 2558-2568.
[28]	S. Yue, R. Li, Z. Wei, Y. Gao, K. Wilson, X. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 71, 353-362.
[29]	L. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Yu, H. García, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2025, 9, 328-342.
[30]	W. Wang, B. Cheng, G. Luo, J. Yu, S. Cao, Mater. Today, 2024, 81, 137-158.
[31]	J. Yan, J. Liu, Y. Ji, M. Batmunkh, D. Li, X. Liu, X. Cao, Y. Li, S. Liu, T. Ma, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 8742-8750.
[32]	Q. Wang, S. Kalathil, C. Pornrungroj, C. D. Sahm, E. Reisner, Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 633-641.
[33]	S. Chen, S. Shen, G. Liu, Y. Qi, F. Zhang, C. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 3047-3051.
[34]	X. Xiang, B. Zhu, J. Zhang, C. Jiang, T. Chen, H. Yu, J. Yu, L. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122301.
[35]	G. Xiao, J. Niu, Y. Fu, J. Cao, J. Wang, Y. Zheng, C. Li, J. Pan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48, 15574-15585.
[36]	R. M. Mohamed, A. Shawky, Opt. Mater., 2022, 124, 112012.
[37]	X. Guo, X. Liu, M. Wang, J. Yan, Y. Chen, S. Liu, Small, 2023, 19, 2206695.
[38]	D. Zhao, Y. Wang, C.-L. Dong, Y.-C. Huang, J. Chen, F. Xue, S. Shen, L. Guo, Nat. Energy, 2021, 6, 388-397.
[39]	C. Zhang, C. Xie, Y. Gao, X. Tao, C. Ding, F. Fan, H.-L. Jiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202204108.
[40]	Z. Zhang, J. T. Yates Jr, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 5520-5551.
[41]	R. Chen, F. Fan, T. Dittrich, C. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 8238-8262.
[42]	M. Gu, J. Zhang, I. V. Kurganskii, A. S. Poryvaev, M. V. Fedin, B. Cheng, J. Yu, L. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2414803.
[43]	F. Le Formal, K. Sivula, M. Grätzel, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 26707-26720.
[44]	P. Lefebvre, J. Allègre, B. Gil, H. Mathieu, N. Grandjean, M. Leroux, J. Massies, P. Bigenwald, Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59, 15363-15367.
[45]	X. Chen, J. Wang, Y. Chai, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, 2007479.
[46]	J. Zhu, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 49, 5-7.
[47]	Y. Yang, X. Zhou, M. Gu, B. Cheng, Z. Wu, J. Zhang, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2025, 41, 100064.
[48]	A. Cao, R. Li, X. Xu, W. Huang, Y. He, J. Li, M. Sun, X. Chen, L. Kang, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 309, 121293.
[49]	Y. Tamai, Y. Fan, V. O. Kim, K. Ziabrev, A. Rao, S. Barlow, S. R. Marder, R. H. Friend, S. M. Menke, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 12473-12481.
[50]	Z. Wei, M. Liu, Z. Zhang, W. Yao, H. Tan, Y. Zhu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 2581-2589.
[51]	S. Xu, S. Chen, Y. Li, Q. Gao, X. Luo, M. Li, L. Ren, P. Wang, L. Liu, J. Wang, X. Chen, Q. Chen, Y. Zhu, Small, 2024, 20, 2400344.
[52]	W. Liu, C. He, S. Huang, K. Zhang, W. Zhu, L. Liu, Z. Zhang, E. Zhu, Y. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202304773.
[53]	H. Wang, K.-F. Xue, Y. Yang, H. Hu, J.-F. Xu, X. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 2360-2367.
[54]	L. Zhu, J. Ji, J. Liu, S. Mine, M. Matsuoka, J. Zhang, M. Xing, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 13968-13976.
[55]	X. Chen, Y. Xu, X. Ma, Y. Zhu, Natl. Sci. Rev., 2020, 7, 652-659.
[56]	F. He, S. Wang, Y. Lu, P. Dong, Y. Zhang, F. Lin, X. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Zhao, S. Wang, X. Duan, J. Zhang, S. Wang, Nano Energy, 2023, 116, 108800.
[57]	R. A. Borse, Y.-X. Tan, J. Lin, E. Zhou, Y. Hui, D. Yuan, Y. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202318136.
[58]	Z. Lin, Y. Wang, Z. Peng, Y.-C. Huang, F. Meng, J.-L. Chen, C.-L. Dong, Q. Zhang, R. Wang, D. Zhao, J. Chen, L. Gu, S. Shen, Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12, 2200716.

强界面电场促进电荷分离增强S型光催化剂的水氧化性能

Boosting photocatalytic water oxidation via interfacial electric field-mediated charge separation in S-scheme photocatalyst

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	封波, 冯丹宁, 裴燕, 宗保宁, 乔明华, 李伟. 缺陷氮化碳负载铜单原子用于高选择性光催化氧化甲烷制甲醇[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 96-107.
[2]	钟威, 孟爱云, 蔡旭东, 甘义遥, 王敬涛, 苏耀荣. Co诱导不对称电荷分布弱化S-H_ad键增强NiCoS助剂的光催化制氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 108-119.
[3]	郑相阳, 吴金往, 史海峰. 双空位诱导极化场与内建电场增强的S型异质结用于去除抗生素及六价铬[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 50-64.
[4]	季碧铖, 李希成, 高帅, 秦泽平, 汪长征, 王强, 王崇臣. 自发极化增强的空心球Bi₄Ti₃O₁₂促进高效压电光催化: 构效关系与降解机制[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 133-145.
[5]	李世杰, 李蕊, 董珂欣, 刘艳萍, 于欣, 李文尧, 刘通, 赵再望, 张明义, 张宾, 陈晓波. 自漂浮Bi₄O₅Br₂/磷掺杂氮化碳/碳纤维布S型异质结光催化剂增强去除新兴有机污染物[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 37-49.
[6]	李正, 曾影, 董媛媛, 吕红金, 杨国昱. 十钨酸盐+Pd/C催化体系中金属/H⁺位点的调控用于光催化生成糠基乙醚[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 137-146.
[7]	熊祺, 史全全, 王彬力, 李杲. 晶面诱导还原导向的AgBr/Ag⁰/TiO₂{100} Z型异质结用于四环素去除[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 164-179.
[8]	艾亚婷, 熊贤强, 朱华跃, 王齐, 翁波, 杨民权. 基于S型Mn_0.5Cd_0.5S/In₂S₃异质结光催化剂的新兴污染物消除系统评估: 降解路径、毒性评价及机理分析[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 147-163.
[9]	王啟航, 孟利, 李卓, 杨卓然, 汤意南, 余浪, 李志君, 孙建辉, 井立强. 钴单原子-磷酸功能化还原氧化石墨烯/苝四羧酸纳米片异质结用于高效光催化生产过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 192-203.
[10]	陈鸿境, 李月英, 陈敏, 解仲凯, 施伟东. 硫电子桥介导CuInS₂/CuS异质结构实现高选择性CO₂光还原为C₂H₄[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 180-191.
[11]	吴崇备, 楚飞鸿, 郝永超, 李璇, 贾晓月, 孙伊钒, 谷佳璇, 加鹏飞, 王傲冰, 江吉周. 共价有机框架的双氧气还原中心促进光催化合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 329-340.
[12]	张自豪, 张家铭, 王海峰, 刘梦, 许垚, 刘铠玮, 张博杨, 史珂, 张继方, 马贵军. 基于Sm₂Ti₂O₅S₂纳米片各向异性电荷迁移性质提升光催化分解水产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 341-351.
[13]	郑馨龙, 宋一铭, 王崇太, 高奇志, 邵钟鋆, 林佳鑫, 翟佳迪, 李静, 史晓东, 吴道雄, 刘维峰, 黄玮, 陈琦, 田新龙, 刘雨昊. 铜/锌体系多元过渡金属硫化物光催化剂的半导体特性及其光催化制氢的应用与挑战[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 22-70.
[14]	周正宇, 靳治良. 自定义暴露晶面: 最佳晶面各向异性和欧姆异质结的协同效应促进光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 294-307.
[15]	张鹏坤, 吴秦汉, 王昊昱, 郭东昊, 赖雨洁, 陆东芳, 李吉庆, 林金国, 袁占辉, 陈孝云. Z型异质结Zn₃(OH)₂(V₂O₇)(H₂O)₂/V-Zn(O,S): 钒异价态与氧空位缺陷协同增强可见光催化固氮性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 279-293.