迈向高效选择性加氢: 单原子催化剂的作用

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64906-0

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 81: 69-96.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64906-0

迈向高效选择性加氢: 单原子催化剂的作用

李沛坤^a, 吕井辉^a(), 赵以勇^a, 吴汉^a, 张祥豪^a, 陆倩楠^a, Yizhi Xiang^b, Blaž Likozar^c, Matej Huš^c^,^d, Adriana Zaleska-Medynska^e, 李小年^a()

^a 浙江工业大学化学工程学院, 绿色化学合成与转化国家重点实验室, 催化剂表界面科学与工程浙江省重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310032, 中国
^b 密苏里大学化学工程与生物工程系, 密苏里哥伦比亚, 美国
^c 斯洛文尼亚国家化学研究所, 催化与化学反应工程系, 卢布尔雅那, 斯洛文尼亚
^d 斯洛文尼亚技术文化协会, 卢布尔雅那, 斯洛文尼亚
^e 格但斯克大学化学学院, 环境技术系, 格但斯克, 波兰

收稿日期:2025-07-15 接受日期:2025-09-28 出版日期:2026-02-18 发布日期:2025-12-26
通讯作者: *电子信箱: lyujh@zjut.edu.cn (吕井辉),xnli@zjut.edu.cn (李小年).
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(NSFC22278368);国家自然科学基金(NSFC22578399);浙江省自然科学基金(LY21B060006);浙江工业大学与工业之间的技术转让项目(KYY-ZH-20240069);榆林清洁能源创新研究院能源变革科技项目(E412022701)

Towards highly efficient selective hydrogenation: The role of single-atom catalysts

Peikun Li^a, Jinghui Lyu^a(), Yiyong Zhao^a, Han Wu^a, Xianghao Zhang^a, Qiannan Lu^a, Yizhi Xiang^b, Blaž Likozar^c, Matej Huš^c^,^d, Adriana Zaleska-Medynska^e, Xiaonian Li^a()

^a College of Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Synthesis and Conversion, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Science and Engineering for Catalysts, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, Zhejiang, China
^b Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
^c National Institute of Chemistry, Department of Catalysis and Chemical Reaction Engineering, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
^d Association for Technical Culture of Slovenia (ZOTKS), SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
^e Department of Environmental Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdansk 80-308, Poland

Received:2025-07-15 Accepted:2025-09-28 Online:2026-02-18 Published:2025-12-26
Contact: *E-mail: lyujh@zjut.edu.cn (J. Lyu),xnli@zjut.edu.cn (X. Li).
About author:Peikun Li (College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology (ZJUT)) is currently pursuing his Master’s degree under the supervision of Professor Jinghui Lyu. His research is broadly centered on industrial catalysis, with an emphasis on the rational design and synthesis of advanced catalytic materials, catalytic reaction engineering, and the development of transition metal-based catalytic systems. He has a particular interest in zeolite, single-atom catalysts, and electrocatalytic processes, where he seeks to unravel structure-activity relationships and establish strategies for improving catalytic efficiency, selectivity, and long-term stability.
Jinghui Lyu (College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology (ZJUT)) received his B.S. in 2006 and Ph.D degree in 2014 from ZJUT under the supervision of Prof. Xiaonian Li. He worked as a technology and engineering researcher (2006-2008) and as a postdoctoral fellow (2014-2016), contributing to the industrialization of several lab-scale catalytic technologies. From 2019 to 2020, he was a visiting scholar at Western University, Canada. His research focuses on heterogeneous catalysis, particularly the design and application of porous materials and supported metal catalysts for green chemical processes, including selective hydrogenation, oxidation reactions, and continuous flow catalysis. He received First Prize of the National Ministry of Education Technological Invention Award for green catalytic hydrogenation processes, Second Prize of Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Progress Award and the Second Prize of the China Chemical Society Science and Technology Progress Award for contributions to the continuous and miniaturized chemical processes. The green hydrogenation process and catalyst, along with the related research on continuous and miniaturized chemical processes have already been industrialized. He has led multiple national research projects in China and successfully transferred patented catalytic technologies to industrial practice.
Xiaonian Li (College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology (ZJUT)), PhD, Professor, is a doctoral supervisor at ZJUT, a Fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering, and former President of the university. He received his PhD from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 1998 and conducted postdoctoral research at the University of British Columbia and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research focuses on industrial catalysis and green chemical processes. He has received the National Technological Invention Second Prize and holds several academic roles, including member of the State Council Academic Evaluation Committee and executive director of the Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC22278368);National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC22578399);Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation(LY21B060006);Technology Transfer Project between Zhejiang University of Technology and Industry(KYY-ZH-20240069);Energy Revolution S &T Program of Yulin Innovation Institute of Clean Energy(E412022701)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选择性加氢在诸多化学过程和环境应用中都具有至关重要的作用, 因为在这些反应中, 只有对反应活性和选择性的精准把控, 才能实现高纯度产物的高效制备. 单原子催化剂(SACs)由于其金属位点以原子级分散的独特结构, 能够在一定程度上兼具均相催化和多相催化的优势, 被视为一种具有颠覆性的催化平台. 它们不仅在选择性加氢反应中展现出极高的催化效率和反应选择性, 而且能够大幅减少关键稀缺金属资源的使用, 从而在推动绿色化学和可持续发展方面展现出广阔前景.

本文系统综述了近年来单原子催化剂在选择性加氢反应中的研究进展, 重点分析了其独特的催化特性以及影响催化性能的关键因素. SACs凭借其金属位点以原子级分散的独特结构, 在均相和非均相催化剂之间架起了桥梁, 既兼具均相催化的高选择性, 又保留了非均相催化在分离和稳定性上的优势, 从而成为选择性加氢领域的一个变革性平台. 根据金属单原子位点的不同, 归纳了SACs在选择性加氢中的应用进行, 包括贵金属SACs、非贵金属SACs、双金属SACs以及单原子合金, 它们在炔烃、芳香族化合物、酚类、醛类物质和CO₂选择性加氢反应中均表现出优异的性能. 介绍了SACs的发展历史, 总结了多种典型的合成策略与配位环境调控方法, 详细叙述了SACs的原子建模并重点剖析了建模过程中潜在的不确定性来源, 深层挖掘了H₂的活化机理, 揭示了单原子位点在氢均裂与异裂机制中的独特作用, 还对不同单金属SACs在多类反应体系中的催化活性与适用范围进行了对比性讨论. 在方法上力求突破单一维度的总结, 提供了一种整体化、多学科交叉的视角, 强调了结构-活性关系、反应机理路径以及前瞻性挑战的重要性. 此外, 特别关注了未来发展中可能面临的挑战, 如何在保持高活性与高选择性的同时实现催化剂结构的可控合成, 如何通过配位环境精细调控进一步优化性能, 以及如何解决规模化制备与工业放大过程中的稳定性与可重复性问题. 本文旨在为可持续催化剂设计提供一幅前瞻性的蓝图, 在这一过程中, SACs不仅展现出在资源高效利用方面的潜力, 也为减少关键稀缺金属的使用、推动绿色化学与清洁能源技术的发展提供了重要契机.

在未来, 推动单原子催化剂实际应用需聚焦五方面: 先进原位表征、可规模化高负载合成、通用多金属载体平台、高通量筛选金属-载体协同效应, 以及可持续前驱体与循环利用策略. 期望这篇综述能够为从事相关研究的化学家和工程师提供深刻的参考资料, 帮助他们在开发高效的单原子催化剂方面取得新的突破.

关键词: 单原子催化, 选择加氢, 氢气活化, 催化剂设计, 原子尺度建模

Abstract:

Selective hydrogenation is crucial in various chemical processes and environmental applications, where precise control of reactivity and selectivity is essential for the efficient production of high-purity products. Single-atom catalysts (SACs), with atomically dispersed metal sites, could bridge homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis and have emerged as a transformative platform for highly efficient selective hydrogenation with minimal use of critical raw materials as catalysts. This review explores the latest advancements in this cutting-edge area. Specifically, we analyze the structure-activity relationships, such as catalytic properties and mechanisms that determine the reactivity and selectivity of such catalytic systems. Furthermore, we discuss challenges, including stability, synthesis scalability, coordination environment tuning, atomistic modeling, and mechanistic insights, while identifying research opportunities for optimizing SACs performance. If these challenges are addressed, SACs hold the potential to revolutionize selective hydrogenation processes, offering sustainable and highly efficient catalytic solutions for industrial applications.

Key words: Single atom catalysis, Selective hydrogenation, H₂ activation, Catalyst design, Atomistic modeling

李沛坤, 吕井辉, 赵以勇, 吴汉, 张祥豪, 陆倩楠, Yizhi Xiang, Blaž Likozar, Matej Huš, Adriana Zaleska-Medynska, 李小年. 迈向高效选择性加氢: 单原子催化剂的作用[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 81: 69-96.

Peikun Li, Jinghui Lyu, Yiyong Zhao, Han Wu, Xianghao Zhang, Qiannan Lu, Yizhi Xiang, Blaž Likozar, Matej Huš, Adriana Zaleska-Medynska, Xiaonian Li. Towards highly efficient selective hydrogenation: The role of single-atom catalysts[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81: 69-96.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64906-0

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V81/I2/69

图/表 24

Fig. 1. Applications of SACs in hydrogenation.

Fig. 2. Development of SACs for hydrogenation from 2011 to 2025 [26,39-61]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [26]. Copyright 2011, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2003, John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright 2013, John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright 2014, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2016, John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2018, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2020, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. Copyright 2021, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2024, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2021, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [59]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2023, Springer nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons.

Table 1 Summary of advantages and disadvantages of preparation methods for SACs.

Preparation method	Advantage	Disadvantag
Wetness impregnation	simple to operate	metal atoms generally do not achieve uniform dispersion on the surface of the support
Ion exchange	enables the synthesis of highly loaded single atoms on the support surface	only applicable for the synthesis of limited types of SACs
Co-precipitation	suitable for the preparation of composite oxides with two or more uniformly dispersed metal elements	1. preparation parameters exert a significant influence on catalyst performance 2. a portion of active atoms remain unexposed and thus cannot participate in catalytic reactions
Templated hydrothermal	simple and easy to operate	same as ion exchange
Metal leaching	preparation of monodispersed catalysts by a two-step method	1. only suitable for a limited range of specific metals and support materials 2. the preparation process is associated with environmental pollution
Facile adsorption	simple and easy to operate	a proper interaction between the active metal components and the catalyst support is required
Strong electrostatic adsorption	suitable for the preparation of high-quality precious metal SACs	the adsorption behavior is influenced by multiple factors
Pyrolysis synthesis	facilitates straightforward preparation of SACs	demands a high pyrolysis temperature
Ball-milling	simple, scalable production, green	the catalysts are prone to agglomeration
Two-step doping	high stability	1. it is necessary to provide mobile atoms and a support capable of capturing mobile species 2. high-temperature synthesis necessitates a high-energy atom/ion generator
Host-guest strategy	1. strong stabilization of isolated atoms 2. tunable coordination environment	1. limited to supports with suitable porosity 2. complex synthesis routes
Photoreduction	the approach requires no specialized equipment and is straightforward to implement	the catalytic active centers are generally non-uniform
Atomic layer deposition	1. precise manipulation of process parameters 2. superior deposition uniformity and high reproducibility 3. the loading of singly dispersed atoms can be tailored by adjusting the number of deposition cycles	1. only support materials functionalized with appropriate ligands or functional groups are viable for selection 2. not amenable to large-scale commercial manufacturing
Atom trapping	the operation process is simple	same as two-step doping
One-pot wet chemistry	1. no specialized experimental setup or multi-step reaction conditions are required, which is conducive to large-scale production 2. high loading of isolated metal atoms can be achieved	limited by the solubility of different precursors
Cyclic voltammetry	less additives are demanded and no interfering products are generated	an electrochemical station is needed and the operation cost is high

Table 1 Summary of advantages and disadvantages of preparation methods for SACs.

Preparation method	Advantage	Disadvantag
Wetness impregnation	simple to operate	metal atoms generally do not achieve uniform dispersion on the surface of the support
Ion exchange	enables the synthesis of highly loaded single atoms on the support surface	only applicable for the synthesis of limited types of SACs
Co-precipitation	suitable for the preparation of composite oxides with two or more uniformly dispersed metal elements	1. preparation parameters exert a significant influence on catalyst performance 2. a portion of active atoms remain unexposed and thus cannot participate in catalytic reactions
Templated hydrothermal	simple and easy to operate	same as ion exchange
Metal leaching	preparation of monodispersed catalysts by a two-step method	1. only suitable for a limited range of specific metals and support materials 2. the preparation process is associated with environmental pollution
Facile adsorption	simple and easy to operate	a proper interaction between the active metal components and the catalyst support is required
Strong electrostatic adsorption	suitable for the preparation of high-quality precious metal SACs	the adsorption behavior is influenced by multiple factors
Pyrolysis synthesis	facilitates straightforward preparation of SACs	demands a high pyrolysis temperature
Ball-milling	simple, scalable production, green	the catalysts are prone to agglomeration
Two-step doping	high stability	1. it is necessary to provide mobile atoms and a support capable of capturing mobile species 2. high-temperature synthesis necessitates a high-energy atom/ion generator
Host-guest strategy	1. strong stabilization of isolated atoms 2. tunable coordination environment	1. limited to supports with suitable porosity 2. complex synthesis routes
Photoreduction	the approach requires no specialized equipment and is straightforward to implement	the catalytic active centers are generally non-uniform
Atomic layer deposition	1. precise manipulation of process parameters 2. superior deposition uniformity and high reproducibility 3. the loading of singly dispersed atoms can be tailored by adjusting the number of deposition cycles	1. only support materials functionalized with appropriate ligands or functional groups are viable for selection 2. not amenable to large-scale commercial manufacturing
Atom trapping	the operation process is simple	same as two-step doping
One-pot wet chemistry	1. no specialized experimental setup or multi-step reaction conditions are required, which is conducive to large-scale production 2. high loading of isolated metal atoms can be achieved	limited by the solubility of different precursors
Cyclic voltammetry	less additives are demanded and no interfering products are generated	an electrochemical station is needed and the operation cost is high

Fig. 3. (a) HAADF-STEM image of 0.08% Pt/FeOx-R200. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright 2014, Springer nature. (b) STM image of 0.02 ML Pt/Cu (111) SAA surface. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright 2014, Springer nature. (c) Schematic illustration of the 0.2Pt/m-Al2O3-H2 synthesis process. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [78]. Copyright 2017, Springer nature. (d) Schematic synthetic illustration for constructing single-atom Pd supported on nanoscale TiO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2020, Springer nature.

Fig. 4. (a) Promising candidates at different temperatures are highlighted in the figure. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [98]. Copyright 2021, Springer nature. (b) Stability of SAAs relative to competing configurations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [99]. Copyright 2020, Springer nature. (c) Trapping energies of metal atoms, defined as the difference in the binding energies at the point defects and the ideal graphene or h-BN. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [102]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 6. (a) Design scheme to promote homolysis of H2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [111]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (b) Model of Pd1/C3N4 catalytic dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [114]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (c) Model diagram of activation of hydrogen molecules catalyzed by Pt@Y. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [115]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.

Table 2 The performance of noble metal SACs in selective hydrogenation reactions.

Catalyst	Reactant	Product	T (°C)	P (bar)	Conv. (%)	Sel. (%)	TOF (h^‒1)	Ref.
Pd₁/TiO₂	acetylene	ethylene	120	1	100	65	—	[116]
Pd₁-N8/CNT	acetylene	ethylene	40	1	83	98	1998	[117]
Pd₁/CeO₂	acetylene	ethylene	150	1	90	80.6	—	[118]
Z@Pd₁@Z	acetylene	ethylene	120	1	100	98.3	—	[119]
Pd₁/SiO₂-NH₂	acetylene	ethylene	190	1	100	92	18451.2	[120]
Pd/PPh₃-COF	acetylene	ethylene	80	1	90	95	86.4	[121]
Pd₁/G	phenylacetylene	styrene	25	1	100	94	267	[122]
Pd₁/Ni@G	phenylacetylene	styrene	30	2	100	93	7074	[123]
Pd₁/NC-PHF	phenylacetylene	styrene	60	5	93.1	93.5	139.1	[124]
Pd_0.2/TiO₂	phenylacetylene	styrene	25	10	99	91	8596	[79]
Pd₁+Pd_n@NC/HAP	2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol	2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol	30	1	99	97.2	3707.7	[125]
Pd₁/TiO₂	acetophenone	1-phenylethanol	60	5	99.9	97.4	1571	[126]
Pd₁/α-MOC	4-nitrochlorobenzene	4-chloroaniline	60	5	100	99	2280	[127]
Pd/CHT-800	phenol	cyclohexanone	170	10	100	99.9	213.1	[128]
Pd₁/TiO₂	4-chlorophenol	cyclohexanone	25	1	100	95.63	95.05	[129]
Pd₁/CeO₂	4-chlorophenol	phenol	25	1	100	47.1	4.1	[130]
Pd₁/rGO	4-chlorophenol	phenol	25	1	—	100	—	[131]
Pd₁/C₃N₄	4-chlorophenol	phenol	90	1	99	99	146	[114]
Pd₁/C₃N₄	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	80	1	64	99	13333	[114]
Pd₁/α-MOC	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	80	10	96.7	92.4	—	[132]
Pd₁/SAPO-31	vanillin	vanillyl alcohol	80	1	99	99	3000	[133]
Pd₁/h-BN	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	50	1	99	93	1112	[134]
Pt₁@Y	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	130	30	100	92	— —	[115]
Pt₁@Y	2-nitrochlorobenzene	2-chloroaniline	100	20	100	99	— —	[115]
Pt/FeO_xH_y	propyne	propylene	120	1	—	94.1	9.4×10⁵	[135]
Pt₁/TiO₂-600	p-chloronitrobenzene	p-chloroaniline	80	15	100	99	—	[136]
Pt₁/CoAlO_x	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	25	1	100	99	—	[137]
Pt₁/Ti₃C₂T_x	formaldehyde	methanol	25	1	30.7	95.8	—	[138]
Pt₁/CeO₂	nitroarene	aromatic amines	70	1	45.4	99.7	198	[139]
Pt₁/NC	nitroarene	aromatic amines	30	10	99	99	9428.1	[140]
Pt₁/TiO₂	m-cresol	m-xylene	350	1	15	—	1	[141]
Pt₁/TiO₂	CO₂	CO	350	1	7.5	100	15	[142]
Rh₁CaAl-LDH	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	80	20	100	99	246	[143]
1Na-Rh/ZrO₂	CO₂	methyl formate	300	10	62	99	9.4	[144]
Rh₁/TiO₂@C₂NH₂PA	CO₂	CO	250	1	21	100	1020	[145]
Rh₁/TiO₂	CO₂	CO	500	1	3	96	—	[146]
Rh₁/CeTiO_x	CO₂	ethanol	250	30	6.3	99.1	493.1	[147]
Ru₁/In₂O₃-F	CO₂	methanol	290	50	12.9	74.02	671.4	[148]
0.6Ru-IPP_PF6	CO₂	methyl formate	120	30	25	99	166.7	[149]
Ru₁N₃	CO₂	CH₄	150	1	30	95	—	[150]
Ru₁N₃	CO	CH₄	150	1	99	95	—	[150]
Ru/CeO₂-S	aromatics	cyclohexanols	200	10	99.9	92.1	336.6	[151]
Ru₁/CeO₂	nitrobenzene	aniline	120	20	17.9	88.2	—	[152]
Ir₁₊_n_p/CMK	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	100	20	—	99	7800	[153]

Table 2 The performance of noble metal SACs in selective hydrogenation reactions.

Catalyst	Reactant	Product	T (°C)	P (bar)	Conv. (%)	Sel. (%)	TOF (h^‒1)	Ref.
Pd₁/TiO₂	acetylene	ethylene	120	1	100	65	—	[116]
Pd₁-N8/CNT	acetylene	ethylene	40	1	83	98	1998	[117]
Pd₁/CeO₂	acetylene	ethylene	150	1	90	80.6	—	[118]
Z@Pd₁@Z	acetylene	ethylene	120	1	100	98.3	—	[119]
Pd₁/SiO₂-NH₂	acetylene	ethylene	190	1	100	92	18451.2	[120]
Pd/PPh₃-COF	acetylene	ethylene	80	1	90	95	86.4	[121]
Pd₁/G	phenylacetylene	styrene	25	1	100	94	267	[122]
Pd₁/Ni@G	phenylacetylene	styrene	30	2	100	93	7074	[123]
Pd₁/NC-PHF	phenylacetylene	styrene	60	5	93.1	93.5	139.1	[124]
Pd_0.2/TiO₂	phenylacetylene	styrene	25	10	99	91	8596	[79]
Pd₁+Pd_n@NC/HAP	2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol	2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol	30	1	99	97.2	3707.7	[125]
Pd₁/TiO₂	acetophenone	1-phenylethanol	60	5	99.9	97.4	1571	[126]
Pd₁/α-MOC	4-nitrochlorobenzene	4-chloroaniline	60	5	100	99	2280	[127]
Pd/CHT-800	phenol	cyclohexanone	170	10	100	99.9	213.1	[128]
Pd₁/TiO₂	4-chlorophenol	cyclohexanone	25	1	100	95.63	95.05	[129]
Pd₁/CeO₂	4-chlorophenol	phenol	25	1	100	47.1	4.1	[130]
Pd₁/rGO	4-chlorophenol	phenol	25	1	—	100	—	[131]
Pd₁/C₃N₄	4-chlorophenol	phenol	90	1	99	99	146	[114]
Pd₁/C₃N₄	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	80	1	64	99	13333	[114]
Pd₁/α-MOC	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	80	10	96.7	92.4	—	[132]
Pd₁/SAPO-31	vanillin	vanillyl alcohol	80	1	99	99	3000	[133]
Pd₁/h-BN	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	50	1	99	93	1112	[134]
Pt₁@Y	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	130	30	100	92	— —	[115]
Pt₁@Y	2-nitrochlorobenzene	2-chloroaniline	100	20	100	99	— —	[115]
Pt/FeO_xH_y	propyne	propylene	120	1	—	94.1	9.4×10⁵	[135]
Pt₁/TiO₂-600	p-chloronitrobenzene	p-chloroaniline	80	15	100	99	—	[136]
Pt₁/CoAlO_x	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	25	1	100	99	—	[137]
Pt₁/Ti₃C₂T_x	formaldehyde	methanol	25	1	30.7	95.8	—	[138]
Pt₁/CeO₂	nitroarene	aromatic amines	70	1	45.4	99.7	198	[139]
Pt₁/NC	nitroarene	aromatic amines	30	10	99	99	9428.1	[140]
Pt₁/TiO₂	m-cresol	m-xylene	350	1	15	—	1	[141]
Pt₁/TiO₂	CO₂	CO	350	1	7.5	100	15	[142]
Rh₁CaAl-LDH	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	80	20	100	99	246	[143]
1Na-Rh/ZrO₂	CO₂	methyl formate	300	10	62	99	9.4	[144]
Rh₁/TiO₂@C₂NH₂PA	CO₂	CO	250	1	21	100	1020	[145]
Rh₁/TiO₂	CO₂	CO	500	1	3	96	—	[146]
Rh₁/CeTiO_x	CO₂	ethanol	250	30	6.3	99.1	493.1	[147]
Ru₁/In₂O₃-F	CO₂	methanol	290	50	12.9	74.02	671.4	[148]
0.6Ru-IPP_PF6	CO₂	methyl formate	120	30	25	99	166.7	[149]
Ru₁N₃	CO₂	CH₄	150	1	30	95	—	[150]
Ru₁N₃	CO	CH₄	150	1	99	95	—	[150]
Ru/CeO₂-S	aromatics	cyclohexanols	200	10	99.9	92.1	336.6	[151]
Ru₁/CeO₂	nitrobenzene	aniline	120	20	17.9	88.2	—	[152]
Ir₁₊_n_p/CMK	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	100	20	—	99	7800	[153]

Fig. 7. (a) Ethylene selectivity as a function of temperature for acetylene semi-hydrogenation over Pd/TiO2-200H and Pd/TiO2-600H. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. Copyright 2022, Springer nature. (b) Ethylene selectivity as a function of temperature for selective hydrogenation of acetylene in excess ethylene over different samples. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright 2022, Springer nature. (c) Magnetic property test for Pd1/Ni@G with an external magnetic field. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons. (d) The cycle performance of Pd1/NC-PHF. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.

Fig. 8. (a) Comparison of the activities of Pd1/TiO2 and Pdn/TiO2 at different temperatures. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [126]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (b) Conversion and product selectivity over various Pd-containing catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [127]. Copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons. (c) The yield and selectivity of CYC via reaction time. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [129]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier. (d) Illustrates electron density differences, activation energy, and migration energy of hydrogen on different models about Pd SACs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [132]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons.

Fig. 9. (a) The hydrogenation of various halogenated nitrobenzenes over Pt1/TiO2-600. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons. (b) Reaction mechanism of FAL hydrogenation to FOL or THFOL over Pt1/CoAlOx or Ptn/CoAlOx, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [137]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (c) Conversion and selectivity of trans-β-nitrostyrene hydrogenation over Pt1/CeO2 catalyst in recycling tests. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [139]. Copyright 2022, Springer nature. (d) A schematic illustration of the regulation of Rh1-ZrO2 cooperativity by Na ions for selectivity tuning. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [144]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. (e) CO2 conversion and product distribution. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [145]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (f) Selective hydrogenation reaction equation for dearomatization of aromatics. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [147]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons.

Table 3 The performance of non-noble metal SACs in selective hydrogenation reactions.

Catalyst	Reactant	Product	T (°C)	P (bar)	Conv. (%)	Sel. (%)	TOF (h^‒1)	Ref.
Co₁/@Y	acetylene	ethylene	220	1	90	93	—	[56]
Co-N₄P₁	halonitrobenzene	haloanilines	80	5	83.2	99	—	[61]
Co₃N₄-S	p-chloronitrobenzene	p-chloroaniline	80	10	94.5	90.7	—	[164]
Co₁/NC	nitrocompounds	aminocompounds	100	5	100	100	—	[55]
Co/SBA-15	CO₂	CO	600	1	37	99	304.6	[165]
Co/C-PAQ	nitrobenzene	aniline	80	10	99	99	398	[166]
Co₁/Co_n@NCNS	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	50	10	99	99	—	[167]
Co-NAC	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	80	20	99	99	19.7	[168]
Co₁/NPC	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	110	30	99	99	6560	[169]
Co₁-N/P-C	p-chloronitrobenzene	p-chloroaniline	100	20	99	99	241.5	[170]
Co₁/NC	nitrobenzene	aniline	110	30	99.7	99.1	76.8	[171]
Co@N_x-C-800	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	120	15	100	99	317.7	[172]
Co-N₄/TiN-rGO	4-nitrophenol	4-aminophenol	25	1	99	99	—	[173]
Co₁@NC-(SBA)	vanillin	vanillyl alcohol	140	10	100	99.2	—	[174]
Co₁@NC-(SBA)	p-nitrochlorobenzene	p-chloroaniline	90	10	100	99	—	[174]
Co₁@NHOPC	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	100	20	100	99	—	[175]
Cu₁/CN/TiO₂	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	60	1	94	99	104	[176]
Cu₁/NC	acetylene	ethylene	25	1	—	97	—	[54]
Cu₁/CN	phenylacetylene	styrene	70	1	94	99	74	[177]
Cu₁/TiO₂	2-butyne-1,4-diol	2-butene-1,4-diol	25	1	100	99.4	—	[178]
Fe-ZIF-800	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	120	1	99.5	96.9	1882	[60]
Fe-N/S-C	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	25	1	100	99	116.9	[179]
Fe₁/N-C	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	60	1	100	99	748	[180]
Fe₁/N-C	nitrobenzene	aniline	160	5	99	99	—	[181]
Mo/NC	CO₂	CO	500	0.69	30.4	100	80	[182]
Ni₁/Bi₃O₄Br	CO₂	CH₄	40	0.95	—	95.1	—	[183]
Ni₁-Ni_x/C_v	acetylene	ethylene	240	1	95.26	93.5	—	[184]
Ni₁-N₃/C	acetylene	ethylene	220	1	100	94	—	[185]
Ni SAs-N@LC	vanillin	vanillyl alcohol	180	1	98.93	97.3	—	[186]
Ni₁/TiO₂	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	130	30	98	90	102	[187]
Ni₁@Beta	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	110	10	93.7	97.5	114.1	[188]
Ni₁/NC	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	100	1	99	99	2908.1	[189]

Table 3 The performance of non-noble metal SACs in selective hydrogenation reactions.

Catalyst	Reactant	Product	T (°C)	P (bar)	Conv. (%)	Sel. (%)	TOF (h^‒1)	Ref.
Co₁/@Y	acetylene	ethylene	220	1	90	93	—	[56]
Co-N₄P₁	halonitrobenzene	haloanilines	80	5	83.2	99	—	[61]
Co₃N₄-S	p-chloronitrobenzene	p-chloroaniline	80	10	94.5	90.7	—	[164]
Co₁/NC	nitrocompounds	aminocompounds	100	5	100	100	—	[55]
Co/SBA-15	CO₂	CO	600	1	37	99	304.6	[165]
Co/C-PAQ	nitrobenzene	aniline	80	10	99	99	398	[166]
Co₁/Co_n@NCNS	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	50	10	99	99	—	[167]
Co-NAC	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	80	20	99	99	19.7	[168]
Co₁/NPC	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	110	30	99	99	6560	[169]
Co₁-N/P-C	p-chloronitrobenzene	p-chloroaniline	100	20	99	99	241.5	[170]
Co₁/NC	nitrobenzene	aniline	110	30	99.7	99.1	76.8	[171]
Co@N_x-C-800	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	120	15	100	99	317.7	[172]
Co-N₄/TiN-rGO	4-nitrophenol	4-aminophenol	25	1	99	99	—	[173]
Co₁@NC-(SBA)	vanillin	vanillyl alcohol	140	10	100	99.2	—	[174]
Co₁@NC-(SBA)	p-nitrochlorobenzene	p-chloroaniline	90	10	100	99	—	[174]
Co₁@NHOPC	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	100	20	100	99	—	[175]
Cu₁/CN/TiO₂	quinoline	1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline	60	1	94	99	104	[176]
Cu₁/NC	acetylene	ethylene	25	1	—	97	—	[54]
Cu₁/CN	phenylacetylene	styrene	70	1	94	99	74	[177]
Cu₁/TiO₂	2-butyne-1,4-diol	2-butene-1,4-diol	25	1	100	99.4	—	[178]
Fe-ZIF-800	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	120	1	99.5	96.9	1882	[60]
Fe-N/S-C	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	25	1	100	99	116.9	[179]
Fe₁/N-C	nitroarenes	aromatic amines	60	1	100	99	748	[180]
Fe₁/N-C	nitrobenzene	aniline	160	5	99	99	—	[181]
Mo/NC	CO₂	CO	500	0.69	30.4	100	80	[182]
Ni₁/Bi₃O₄Br	CO₂	CH₄	40	0.95	—	95.1	—	[183]
Ni₁-Ni_x/C_v	acetylene	ethylene	240	1	95.26	93.5	—	[184]
Ni₁-N₃/C	acetylene	ethylene	220	1	100	94	—	[185]
Ni SAs-N@LC	vanillin	vanillyl alcohol	180	1	98.93	97.3	—	[186]
Ni₁/TiO₂	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	130	30	98	90	102	[187]
Ni₁@Beta	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	110	10	93.7	97.5	114.1	[188]
Ni₁/NC	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	100	1	99	99	2908.1	[189]

Fig. 10. (a) Ethylene selectivity as a function of temperature of Co1@Y and Co/Y under the same reaction conditions. (b) Reaction mechanism of acetylene selective hydrogenation over Co1@Y. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (c) The catalytic performance of various catalysts for the p-NB selective hydrogenation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons. (d) Catalytic performance of various Co-SACs in the hydrogenation of p-CNB under H2 atmospheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [164]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (e) Hydrogenation activity test of Co1/NC, Co/NC, and NC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2024, Springer nature. (f) Stability of Co/SBA-15. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [165]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.

Fig. 11. (a) Proposed mechanism for heterolytic cleavage of H2 via the proticsolvent-mediated H-shuttling mechanism on the homogeneous catalyst and Co/C-PAQ. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [166]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) Catalytic results of the 3-nitrostyrene hydrogenation over Co-100-NAC in the presence of S-containing reagents. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [168]. Copyright 2022, Springer nature. (c) Electron-density isosurface of Co atoms in two models. Blue: positive, red: negative. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [169]. Copyright 2022, Springer nature. (d) Catalytic performance of N/P-C, Co1-N-C, Co1-N/P-C, and Pt/C for p-CNB hydrogenation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [170]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (e) Effect of water on the selective hydrogenation of nitrobenzene over Co SAs/NC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [171]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 12. (a) Long-term stability of Cu SA/NC at a current density load of ?100 mA cm?2 and the corresponding FEs of C2H4, C4H6 and H2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. (b) Recycling test of Cu1/CN/Al2O3 for transfer hydrogenation of phenylacetylene. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [177]. Copyright 2010, Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Schematic illustration of the photocatalytic BYD semi-hydrogenation path on Cu-SAs-TiO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [178]. Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 13. (a) Bader charge transfer numbers of Fe-N3S1 and Fe-N4. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [179]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier. (b) Energy profiles of the hydrogenation from PhNO2 to PhNH2 on Fe-N4. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [180]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (c) TOF and production distribution of Mo/NC catalysts versus Mo loading. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [182]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons. (d) Performance comparison of different heterogeneous catalysts for the selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [187]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons.

Fig. 14. Conversion and selectivity of different single-metal SACs toward specific substances in hydrogenation reactions.

Table 4 The performance of bimetallic SACs in selective hydrogenation reactions.

Catalyst	Reactant	Product	T (°C)	P (bar)	Conv. (%)	Sel. (%)	Ref.
Cu₁Au_n/NU-1000	CO₂	C₂H₆	25	1	69.9	71.1	[191]
Co₁Cu₁/PHI	CO₂	formic acid	300	35	—	75	[192]
Zn₁Pd_n/OC/Al₂O₃	p-iodonitrobenzene	p-iodoaniline	80	1	94	100	[193]
Ru₁Ni_n/CNT	cinnamaldehyde	cinnamyl alcohol	160	20	74.1	90	[194]
Pd_n/Ni₁@γ-Al₂O₃	phenylacetylene	styrene	25	1	98	94	[195]
Cu₁Pt_n	epichlorohydrin	3-chloro-1-propanol	90	40	98	92	[196]
Pd₁Cu₁/ND@G	acetylene	ethylene	110	1	100	92	[197]
Ru₁Cu_n/SiO₂	acetylene	ethylene	170	1	100	97.6	[198]
Ag₁Cu₁-C₃N₄	alkyne	olefin	25	1	99	99	[199]
h-Pd₁Mn₁/NC	phenylacetylene	styrene	60	15	99	95	[200]
PdRu-ZPO	phenylacetylene	styrene	60	20	97	91	[201]
Ir₁Mo₁/TiO₂	4-nitrostyrene	4-aminostyrene	120	20	100	96.3	[52]
Ni_0.5Co_0.5-MOF	4-chloronitrobenzene	4-chloroaniline	25	1	99.9	99.1	[202]
Pt₁Fe₁/ND	p-nitrochlorobenzene	p-chloroaniline	80	10	100	99	[203]
Pt₁Co₁-CeO₂	CO₂	CO	400	1	22.5	98.5	[204]
Pt₁Ni₁-CeO₂	CO₂	CO	400	1	16	96.5	[204]

Fig. 15. (a) Schematic illustration of the tannic acid coating-confinement strategy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [193]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons. (b) Stability cyclic test of Pd0.5/Ni0.5@γ-Al2O3. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [194]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (c) Schematic illustration of possible reaction pathway for the catalytic hydrogenation of epichlorohydrin. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [196]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.

Fig. 16. (a) C2H2 conversion rate and C2H4 selectivity as a function of temperature over Pd1Cu1 DSAC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [197]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) Stability test of h-Pd-Mn/NC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [200]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (c) Pd/Ru ratio dependence of the conversion and selectivity of the phenylacetylene semi-hydrogenation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [201]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) Schematic illustration of the construction of 2D NiCo-MOF bimetallic nanosheets for selective reduction of nitroarenes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [202]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) dual single-atoms on CeO2?x support. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [204]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.

Table 5 The performance of SAAs in selective hydrogenation reactions.

Catalyst	Reactant	Product	T (°C)	P (bar)	Conv. (%)	Sel. (%)	Ref.
Pd₁Au	1-hexyne	1-hexene	100	0.2	10.6	98	[205]
Pd₁/NiGa	acetylene	ethylene	110	1	100	95	[206]
Pd₁/NiGa	propyne	propylene	110	1	95	98	[206]
Pd₁Fe	phenylacetylene	styrene	25	1	99.9	96	[207]
Pd₁Ni/SiO₂	acetylene	ethylene	80	1	100	88	[208]
Pd₁/Cu	1,3-butadiene	1-butene	106.9	0.01	100	84	[209]
Ru₁Ni	4-nitrostyrene	4-aminostyrene	60	10	100	99	[210]
Ir₁Ni	4-nitrostyrene	4-aminostyrene	50	10	100	98	[211]
IrCu₁/C	p-bromonitrobenzene	p-bromoaniline	80	10	100	99	[212]
Pd₁Ag₁₀/Al₂O₃	diphenylacetylene	cis-stilbene	25	5	100	99	[213]
CuPd₁/Al₂O₃	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	220	1	99.9	81	[214]
Pd₁Cu/Al₂O₃	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	50	1.5	40.1	99.1	[215]
Pt₁Cu	furfural	furfuryl alcohol	50	20	100	99	[216]
Ru₁Cu	5-hydroxymethylfurfural	5-hydroxymethylfurfuryl alcohol	25	1	65.9	89.4	[217]
Pt₁/Co	5-hydroxymethylfurfural	5-hydroxymethylfurfuryl alcohol	180	10	100	92.9	[218]
Pd₁Cu	crotonaldehyde	crotyl alcohol	50	1.5	99	84.3	[219]

Fig. 17. (a) Schematic representation of the course of 1-hexyne hydrogenation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [205]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (b) high-resolution AC-HAADF-STEM image of RuNi SAA catalyst. (c) Reusability tests of Ru1Ni catalyst within five successive catalytic cycles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [210]. Copyright 2022, Springer nature. (d) Reusability tests of Ir1Ni catalyst within five successive catalytic cycles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [211]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons.

Fig. 18. (a) Reaction pathway of the conversion of FF to 2-MF on Cu8Pd1/Al2O3 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [214]. Copyright 2025, John Wiley and Sons. (b) The reaction profiles of furfural conversion and selectivity [215]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [215]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (c) Reactivity of the PtCu catalysts used at 20 bar. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [216]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (d) Proposed electrochemical reduction mechanism of HMF over Ru1Cu. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [217]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons.

Fig. 19. Challenges faced by SACs.

参考文献

[1]	H. H. Storch, Chem. Rev., 1941, 29, 483-499.
[2]	G. Brieger, T. J. Nestrick, Chem. Rev., 1974, 74, 567-580.
[3]	R. A. W. Johnstone, A. H. Wilby, I. D. Entwistle, Chem. Rev., 1985, 85, 129-170.
[4]	P. Grange, Catal. Rev., 1980, 21, 135-181.
[5]	E. Furimsky, F. E. Massoth, Catal. Rev., 2005, 47, 297-489.
[6]	D. Wang, D. Astruc, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 6621-6686.
[7]	F. Meemken, A. Baiker, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 11522-11569.
[8]	L. Alig, M. Fritz, S. Schneider, Chem. Rev., 2019, 119, 2681-2751.
[9]	W. Wang, S. Wang, X. Ma, J. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3703-3727.
[10]	H. Deldari, Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 293, 1-10.
[11]	J. M. Escola, J. Aguado, D. P. Serrano, A. García, A. Peral, L. Briones, R. Calvo, E. Fernandez, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 106, 405-415.
[12]	M. Crespo-Quesada, F. Cárdenas-Lizana, A.-L. Dessimoz, L. Kiwi-Minsker, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 1773-1786.
[13]	P. Kluson, L. Cerveny, Appl. Catal. A, 1995, 128, 13-31.
[14]	X. Liang, S. Yao, Z. Li, Y. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2025, 58, 1607-1619.
[15]	J. Chen, J. Li, X. Hai, J. Li, T. Zhang, J. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 44617-44632.
[16]	V. G. Chandrashekhar, T. Senthamarai, R. G. Kadam, O. Malina, J. Kašlík, R. Zbořil, M. B. Gawande, R. V. Jagadeesh, M. Beller, Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 20-29.
[17]	H.-U. Blaser, C. Malan, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, H. Steiner, M. Studer, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2003, 345, 103-151.
[18]	L. Zhang, M. Zhou, A. Wang, T. Zhang, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 683-733.
[19]	A. J. McCue, J. A. Anderson, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9, 142-153.
[20]	J. Amsler, B. B. Sarma, G. Agostini, G. Prieto, P. N. Plessow, F. Studt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 5087-5096.
[21]	S. Chaemchuen, X. Xiao, M. Ghadamyari, B. Mousavi, N. Klomkliang, Y. Yuan, F. Verpoort, J. Catal., 2019, 370, 38-45.
[22]	S.-H. Kim, K.-D. Kim, H. Lee, Y.-K. Lee, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 314, 1-10.
[23]	X. Chen, Z. Qiao, B. Hou, H. Jiang, W. Gong, J. Dong, H.-Y. Li, Y. Cui, Y. Liu, Nano Res., 2021, 14, 466-472.
[24]	X. Liang, N. Fu, S. Yao, Z. Li, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 18155-18174.
[25]	T. Maschmeyer, F. Rey, G. Sankar, J. M. Thomas, Nature, 1995, 378, 159-162.
[26]	B. Qiao, A. Wang, X. Yang, L. F. Allard, Z. Jiang, Y. Cui, J. Liu, J. Li, T. Zhang, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 634-641.
[27]	Z. Li, B. Li, Q. Li, Adv. Mater, 2023, 35, 2211103.
[28]	D. Ren, L. He, L. Yu, R.-S. Ding, Y.-M. Liu, Y. Cao, H.-Y. He, K.-N. Fan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 17592-17598.
[29]	T.-N. Ye, Y. Lu, Z. Xiao, J. Li, T. Nakao, H. Abe, Y. Niwa, M. Kitano, T. Tada, H. Hosono, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 5653.
[30]	L. Liu, A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 4981-5079.
[31]	Y. Chen, S. Ji, C. Chen, Q. Peng, D. Wang, Y. Li, Joule, 2018, 2, 1242-1264.
[32]	R. T. Hannagan, G. Giannakakis, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, E. C. H. Sykes, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 12044-12088.
[33]	F. Huang, Y. Deng, Y. Chen, X. Cai, M. Peng, Z. Jia, P. Ren, D. Xiao, X. Wen, N. Wang, H. Liu, D. Ma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 13142-13146.
[34]	F. Huang, Y. Deng, Y. Chen, X. Cai, M. Peng, Z. Jia, J. Xie, D. Xiao, X. Wen, N. Wang, Z. Jiang, H. Liu, D. Ma, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 4431.
[35]	S.-F. Hung, A. Xu, X. Wang, F. Li, S.-H. Hsu, Y. Li, J. Wicks, E. G. Cervantes, A. S. Rasouli, Y. C. Li, M. Luo, D.-H. Nam, N. Wang, T. Peng, Y. Yan, G. Lee, E. H. Sargent, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 819.
[36]	C. Bianchini, V. Dal Santo, A. Meli, S. Moneti, M. Moreno, W. Oberhauser, R. Psaro, L. Sordelli, F. Vizza, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 2636-2639.
[37]	C. Copéret, M. Chabanas, R. Petroff Saint-Arroman, J.-M. Basset, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 156-181.
[38]	M. D. Jones, R. Raja, J. M. Thomas, B. F. G. Johnson, D. W. Lewis, J. Rouzaud, K. D. M. Harris, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4326-4331.
[39]	G. Kyriakou, M. B. Boucher, A. D. Jewell, E. A. Lewis, T. J. Lawton, A. E. Baber, H. L. Tierney, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, E. C. H. Sykes, Science, 2012, 335, 1209-1212.
[40]	M. Takahashi, T. Imaoka, Y. Hongo, K. Yamamoto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7419-7421.
[41]	H. Wei, X. Liu, A. Wang, L. Zhang, B. Qiao, X. Yang, Y. Huang, S. Miao, J. Liu, T. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 5634.
[42]	H. Yan, H. Cheng, H. Yi, Y. Lin, T. Yao, C. Wang, J. Li, S. Wei, J. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 10484-10487.
[43]	R. Lang, T. Li, D. Matsumura, S. Miao, Y. Ren, Y.-T. Cui, Y. Tan, B. Qiao, L. Li, A. Wang, X. Wang, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 16054-16058.
[44]	Q. Feng, S. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Dong, W. Chen, D. He, D. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Zhu, H. Zhu, L. Gu, Z. Li, Y. Liu, R. Yu, J. Li, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 7294-7301.
[45]	X. Wang, W. Chen, L. Zhang, T. Yao, W. Liu, Y. Lin, H. Ju, J. Dong, L. Zheng, W. Yan, X. Zheng, Z. Li, X. Wang, J. Yang, D. He, Y. Wang, Z. Deng, Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 9419-9422.
[46]	S. Wei, A. Li, J.-C. Liu, Z. Li, W. Chen, Y. Gong, Q. Zhang, W.-C. Cheong, Y. Wang, L. Zheng, H. Xiao, C. Chen, D. Wang, Q. Peng, L. Gu, X. Han, J. Li, Y. Li, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2018, 13, 856-861.
[47]	Y. Han, Z. Wang, R. Xu, W. Zhang, W. Chen, L. Zheng, J. Zhang, J. Luo, K. Wu, Y. Zhu, C. Chen, Q. Peng, Q. Liu, P. Hu, D. Wang, Y. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 11262-11266.
[48]	Y. Lou, Y. Zheng, X. Li, N. Ta, J. Xu, Y. Nie, K. Cho, J. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 19289-19295.
[49]	Y. Cao, B. Chen, J. Guerrero-Sánchez, I. Lee, X. Zhou, N. Takeuchi, F. Zaera, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 9150-9157.
[50]	Q. Feng, S. Zhao, Q. Xu, W. Chen, S. Tian, Y. Wang, W. Yan, J. Luo, D. Wang, Y. Li, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1901024.
[51]	X. Long, Z. Li, G. Gao, P. Sun, J. Wang, B. Zhang, J. Zhong, Z. Jiang, F. Li, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 4074.
[52]	J. Fu, J. Dong, R. Si, K. Sun, J. Zhang, M. Li, N. Yu, B. Zhang, M. G. Humphrey, Q. Fu, J. Huang, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 1952-1961.
[53]	D. Zhou, L. Zhang, X. Liu, H. Qi, Q. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Su, J. Ma, J. Yin, A. Wang, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 519-527.
[54]	X. Jiang, L. Tang, L. Dong, X. Sheng, W. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Shen, H. Jiang, C. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202307848.
[55]	R. Chen, X. Wang, J. Dang, S. Yun, L. Wang, F. Kong, Y.-N. Liu, Nano Res., 2024, 17, 4807-4814.
[56]	E. Alhashmi, G. Ebri, K. Hellgardt, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 4121-4140.
[57]	M. Zhou, M. Yang, X. Yang, X. Zhao, L. Sun, W. Deng, A. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41, 524-532.
[58]	T. Yang, X. Mao, Y. Zhang, X. Wu, L. Wang, M. Chu, C.-W. Pao, S. Yang, Y. Xu, X. Huang, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 6022.
[59]	R. Gao, J. Xu, J. Wang, J. Lim, C. Peng, L. Pan, X. Zhang, H. Yang, J.-J. Zou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 573-581.
[60]	Z. An, P. Yang, D. Duan, J. Li, T. Wan, Y. Kong, S. Caratzoulas, S. Xiang, J. Liu, L. Huang, A. I. Frenkel, Y.-Y. Jiang, R. Long, Z. Li, D. G. Vlachos, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 6666.
[61]	G. Chen, J. Gu, W. Gong, J. Li, J. Li, S. Qiu, R. Long, H. Zhao, Y. Xiong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202421277.
[62]	S. K. Kaiser, Z. Chen, D. Faust Akl, S. Mitchell, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 11703-11809.
[63]	X.-F. Yang, A. Wang, B. Qiao, J. Li, J. Liu, T. Zhang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1740-1748.
[64]	Y.-S. Wei, M. Zhang, R. Zou, Q. Xu, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 12089-12174.
[65]	A. Beniya, S. Higashi, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 590-602.
[66]	A. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2018, 2, 65-81.
[67]	S. Mitchell, E. Vorobyeva, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 15316-15329.
[68]	S. Ji, Y. Chen, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, D. Wang, Y. Li, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 11900-11955.
[69]	R. Qin, K. Liu, Q. Wu, N. Zheng, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 11810-11899.
[70]	Y. Ren, Y. Tang, L. Zhang, X. Liu, L. Li, S. Miao, D. Su, A. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 4500.
[71]	Y. Zhang, J. Yang, R. Ge, J. Zhang, J. M. Cairney, Y. Li, M. Zhu, S. Li, W. Li, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2022, 461, 214493.
[72]	L. Zhang, X. Yang, J. Lin, X. Li, X. Liu, B. Qiao, A. Wang, T. Zhang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2025, 58, 1878-1892.
[73]	N. Allasia, S. Xu, S. F. Jafri, E. Borfecchia, L. A. Cipriano, G. Terraneo, S. Tosoni, L. Mino, G. Di Liberto, G. Pacchioni, G. Vilé, Small, 2025, 21, 2408286.
[74]	A. Bakandritsos, R. G. Kadam, P. Kumar, G. Zoppellaro, M. Medved', J. Tuček, T. Montini, O. Tomanec, P. Andrýsková, B. Drahoš, R. S. Varma, M. Otyepka, M. B. Gawande, P. Fornasiero, R. Zbořil, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1900323.
[75]	J. Lin, A. Wang, B. Qiao, X. Liu, X. Yang, X. Wang, J. Liang, J. Li, J. Liu, T. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 15314-15317.
[76]	J. Xing, J.-F. Chen, Y.-H. Li, W.-T. Yuan, Y. Zhou, L.-R. Zheng, H.-F. Wang, P. Hu, Y. Wang, H.-J. Zhao, Y. Wang, H.-G. Yang, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 2138-2144.
[77]	F. R. Lucci, J. Liu, M. D. Marcinkowski, M. Yang, L. F. Allard, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, E. C. H. Sykes, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 8550.
[78]	Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, H. Asakura, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. Zhou, Y. Han, T. Tanaka, A. Wang, T. Zhang, N. Yan, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 16100.
[79]	F. Yang, S. Ding, H. Song, N. Yan, Sci. China Mater., 2020, 63, 982-992.
[80]	F. Wu, C. Pan, C.-T. He, Y. Han, W. Ma, H. Wei, W. Ji, W. Chen, J. Mao, P. Yu, D. Wang, L. Mao, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 16861-16867.
[81]	Z. Jiang, T. Wang, J. Pei, H. Shang, D. Zhou, H. Li, J. Dong, Y. Wang, R. Cao, Z. Zhuang, W. Chen, D. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 2856-2863.
[82]	E. Zhang, T. Wang, K. Yu, J. Liu, W. Chen, A. Li, H. Rong, R. Lin, S. Ji, X. Zheng, Y. Wang, L. Zheng, C. Chen, D. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 16569-16573.
[83]	Z. Geng, Y. Cao, W. Chen, X. Kong, Y. Liu, T. Yao, Y. Lin, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 240, 234-240.
[84]	Z. Sun, S. Wang, W. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 5296-5319.
[85]	D. A. Bulushev, M. Zacharska, E. V. Shlyakhova, A. L. Chuvilin, Y. Guo, S. Beloshapkin, A. V. Okotrub, L. G. Bulusheva, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 681-691.
[86]	G. Vilé, D. Albani, M. Nachtegaal, Z. Chen, D. Dontsova, M. Antonietti, N. López, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 11265-11269.
[87]	M. S. Yordanlı, R. Escobar, J. Meza, D. Akgül, Y. Zhao, A. Uzun, F. Ahu Akin, V. Aviyente, A. C. Atesin, T. A. Ateşin, ChemPhysChem, 2025, 26, e202400867.
[88]	M. Huš, A. Bjelić, M. Grilc, B. Likozar, J. Catal., 2018, 358, 8-18.
[89]	M. Huš, M. Grilc, J. Teržan, S. Gyergyek, B. Likozar, A. Hellman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202305804.
[90]	B. Fu, A. J. McCue, Y. Liu, S. Weng, Y. Song, Y. He, J. Feng, D. Li, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 607-615.
[91]	M. Jørgensen, H. Grönbeck, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 7199-7207.
[92]	W. Xu, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Xu, L. Bian, Q. Ju, Y. Wang, Z. Fang, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 2068.
[93]	D. Wang, H. Shan, W. Yin, H. Li, Fuel, 2024, 355, 129439.
[94]	K. T. Chan, J. B. Neaton, M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B, 2008, 77, 235430.
[95]	X. Wang, J. Li, J. Li, B. Jing, Y. Sun, T. Wang, D. Li, H. Huang, Z. Ao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2024, 12, 14698-14708.
[96]	Y. Feng, L. Zhou, Q. Wan, S. Lin, H. Guo, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 5890-5896.
[97]	J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, A. Logadottir, S. Bahn, L. B. Hansen, M. Bollinger, H. Bengaard, B. Hammer, Z. Sljivancanin, M. Mavrikakis, Y. Xu, S. Dahl, C. J. H. Jacobsen, J. Catal., 2002, 209, 275-278.
[98]	Z.-K. Han, D. Sarker, R. Ouyang, A. Mazheika, Y. Gao, S. V. Levchenko, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 1833.
[99]	K. K. Rao, Q. K. Do, K. Pham, D. Maiti, L. C. Grabow, Top. Catal., 2020, 63, 728-741.
[100]	X. Bai, X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, C. Ling, Y. Zhou, J. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 17140-17148.
[101]	N. Humphrey, S. Bac, S. Mallikarjun Sharada, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2020, 124, 24187-24195.
[102]	D. N. Sredojević, M. R. Belić, Ž. Šljivančanin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2020, 124, 16860-16867.
[103]	Y.-Q. Su, Y. Wang, J.-X. Liu, I. A. W. Filot, K. Alexopoulos, L. Zhang, V. Muravev, B. Zijlstra, D. G. Vlachos, E. J. M. Hensen, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 3289-3297.
[104]	W. Gao, S. Liu, G. Sun, C. Zhang, Y. Pan, Small, 2023, 19, 2300956.
[105]	S. Impeng, E. Salaya-Gerónimo, B. Kunkel, S. Bartling, K. Faungnawakij, B. Rungtaweevoranit, A. M. Abdel-Mageed, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2024, 12, 3084-3095.
[106]	Y. Zhu, J. Zheng, J. Ye, Y. Cui, K. Koh, L. Kovarik, D. M. Camaioni, J. L. Fulton, D. G. Truhlar, M. Neurock, C. J. Cramer, O. Y. Gutiérrez, J. A. Lercher, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 5849.
[107]	K. Liu, R. Qin, N. Zheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 4483-4499.
[108]	H. T. Chen, S. Tosoni, G. Pacchioni, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 5486-5495.
[109]	A. M. Shor, E. A. I. Shor, V. A. Nasluzov, G. N. Vayssilov, N. Rösch, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2007, 3, 2290-2300.
[110]	J. A. Santana, N. Rösch, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 16062-16069.
[111]	B. Wei, X. Liu, K. Hua, Y. Deng, H. Wang, Y. Sun, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 15113-15121.
[112]	O. Eisenstein, R. H. Crabtree, New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 21-27.
[113]	Y. Liu, X. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Li, Q. Lv, D. Wang, S. Zhao, L. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Pan, Adv. Mater, 2025, e13175.
[114]	F. Hu, L. Leng, M. Zhang, W. Chen, Y. Yu, J. Wang, J. H. Horton, Z. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 54146-54154.
[115]	X. Deng, B. Qin, R. Liu, X. Qin, W. Dai, G. Wu, N. Guan, D. Ma, L. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 20898-20906.
[116]	Y. Guo, Y. Huang, B. Zeng, B. Han, M. Akri, M. Shi, Y. Zhao, Q. Li, Y. Su, L. Li, Q. Jiang, Y.-T. Cui, L. Li, R. Li, B. Qiao, T. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 2648.
[117]	M. Hu, Z. Wu, Z. Yao, J. Young, L. Luo, Y. Du, C. Wang, Z. Iqbal, X. Wang, J. Catal., 2021, 395, 46-53.
[118]	Y. Guo, Y. Li, X. Du, L. Li, Q. Jiang, B. Qiao, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 10037-10043.
[119]	Y.-T. Li, W.-G. Cui, Y.-F. Huo, L. Zhou, X. Wang, F. Gao, Q. Zhang, W. Li, T.-L. Hu, Mater. Horiz., 2025, 12, 2351-2359.
[120]	J. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Chen, X. Cai, L. Yang, M. Peng, Y. Wang, Y. Si, F. Hong, X. Chen, B. Sun, J. Diao, L. Jin, G. Wang, D. Ma, H. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, e202515937.
[121]	M. Chen, Y. Fan, S. Wu, Y. Liu, R. Shi, B. Xu, Y. Fan,, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 515, 163744.
[122]	K. Zhang, H.-L. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Z.-W. Xing, P. Tan, Y. Nian, Y. Han, L.-B. Sun, AlChE J., 2025, 71, e18897.
[123]	L. Zhao, X. Qin, X. Zhang, X. Cai, F. Huang, Z. Jia, J. Diao, D. Xiao, Z. Jiang, R. Lu, N. Wang, H. Liu, D. Ma, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2110455.
[124]	S. Li, G. Yue, H. Li, J. Liu, L. Hou, N. Wang, C. Cao, Z. Cui, Y. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 454, 140031.
[125]	Z. Chen, C. Wang, B. Zhang, J. Li, D. Wang, G. Xu, J. Zhang, M. Peng, D. Ma, Y. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2503841.
[126]	G. Guo, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. He, H. Ji, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2023, 62, 19585-19591.
[127]	Y. Ma, Y. Ren, Y. Zhou, W. Liu, W. Baaziz, O. Ersen, C. Pham-Huu, M. Greiner, W. Chu, A. Wang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 21613-21619.
[128]	Y. Liu, Q. Meng, K. Zhang, W. Han, X. Zheng, Y. Wang, Y. Han, J. Wang, H. Wu, M. He, B. Han, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202504260.
[129]	J. Huang, F. Dao, J. Xie, H. Zhang, J. Jiang, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2025, 363, 132109.
[130]	J. Li, M. Li, J. Li, S. Wang, G. Li, X. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 282, 119518.
[131]	D. Huang, D. J. Kim, K. Rigby, X. Zhou, X. Wu, A. Meese, J. Niu, E. Stavitski, J.-H. Kim, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2021, 55, 13306-13316.
[132]	Z. Liu, X. Chen, M. Luo, Q. Jiang, X. Li, C. Yang, Q. Zhang, L. Ma, L. Yan, ChemSusChem, 2025, 18, e202401802.
[133]	X. Lu, C. Guo, M. Zhang, L. Leng, J. H. Horton, W. Wu, Z. Li, Nano Res., 2021, 14, 4347-4355.
[134]	Z. Li, W. Wei, H. Li, S. Li, L. Leng, M. Zhang, J. H. Horton, D. Wang, W. Sun, C. Guo, W. Wu, J. Wang, ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 10175-10184.
[135]	Y. Xu, M. Chu, F. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Liu, M. Cao, J. Gong, J. Luo, H. Lin, Y. Li, Q. Zhang, Nano Lett., 2020, 20, 6865-6872.
[136]	M. Guo, Q. Meng, M.-L. Gao, L. Zheng, Q. Li, L. Jiao, H.-L. Jiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202418964.
[137]	E. Xu, H. Feng, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, K. Liu, S. Cui, H. Meng, G. Wang, Y. Yang, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2023, 6, 14991-15001.
[138]	S. Zhao, Y. Wen, X. Peng, Y. Mi, X. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Zhuo, G. Hu, J. Luo, X. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 8913-8919.
[139]	T. Li, X. Jian, Q. Jiang, B. Qiao, Top. Catal., 2022, 65, 1604-1608.
[140]	Y. Fang, Q. Liu, M. Tian, L. Ruan, K. Chen, H. Zhang, Z. Yang, H. Ye, L. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2025, 13, 21971-21978.
[141]	J. Resasco, F. Yang, T. Mou, B. Wang, P. Christopher, D. E. Resasco, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 595-603.
[142]	X. Hu, L. Tao, K. Lei, Z. Sun, M. Tan, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 73, 186-195.
[143]	J. He, Y. Liang, B. Zhao, L. Liu, Q. He, D. Wang, J. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 70, 353-362.
[144]	S. Li, Y. Xu, H. Wang, B. Teng, Q. Liu, Q. Li, L. Xu, X. Liu, J. Lu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202218167.
[145]	A. H. Jenkins, E. E. Dunphy, M. F. Toney, C. B. Musgrave, J. W. Medlin, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 15340-15350.
[146]	E. K. Schroeder, S. Hong, X. Chen, A. S. Hoffman, Z. Chen, A. Khan, G. D. Barber, S. Bac, R. M. Rioux, J. Yang, C. J. Tassone, S. R. Bare, P. Christopher, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 12133-12147.
[147]	K. Zheng, Y. Li, B. Liu, F. Jiang, Y. Xu, X. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202210991.
[148]	M. Xu, F. Liu, S. Liu, J. Ma, M. Yao, X. Wang, J. Cao, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2025, 221, 289-301.
[149]	H. Liao, H. Zhang, X. Wei, X. Zhao, J. Ding, N. An, P. An, S. Dai, Z. Hou, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 519, 165038.
[150]	H. Geng, H. Zhao, L. Yang, Z. Li, J. Ran, N.-B. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2025, 13, 7939-7948.
[151]	K. Zhang, Q. Meng, H. Wu, J. Yan, X. Mei, P. An, L. Zheng, J. Zhang, M. He, B. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 20834-20846.
[152]	B. Wu, T. Lin, R. Yang, M. Huang, H. Zhang, J. Li, F. Sun, F. Song, Z. Jiang, L. Zhong, Y. Sun, Green Chem., 2021, 23, 4753-4761.
[153]	Q. Shen, H. Jin, P. Li, X. Yu, L. Zheng, W. Song, C. Cao, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 5024-5031.
[154]	D. Teschner, J. Borsodi, A. Wootsch, Z. Révay, M. Hävecker, A. Knop-Gericke, S. D. Jackson, R. Schlögl, Science, 2008, 320, 86-89.
[155]	K. Choe, F. Zheng, H. Wang, Y. Yuan, W. Zhao, G. Xue, X. Qiu, M. Ri, X. Shi, Y. Wang, G. Li, Z. Tang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 3650-3657.
[156]	D. Deng, Y. Yang, Y. Gong, Y. Li, X. Xu, Y. Wang, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 2525-2531.
[157]	C. A. Schoenbaum, D. K. Schwartz, J. W. Medlin, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 1438-1445.
[158]	G. Vilé, N. Almora-Barrios, S. Mitchell, N. López, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 5926-5937.
[159]	X. Chen, M. Peng, X. Cai, Y. Chen, Z. Jia, Y. Deng, B. Mei, Z. Jiang, D. Xiao, X. Wen, N. Wang, H. Liu, D. Ma, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 2664.
[160]	C. Shen, Y. Ji, P. Wang, S. Bai, M. Wang, Y. Li, X. Huang, Q. Shao, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 5231-5239.
[161]	M. Miyazaki, S. Furukawa, T. Takayama, S. Yamazoe, T. Komatsu, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2019, 2, 3307-3314.
[162]	Y. Zhao, J. Sun, J. Miao, X. Zhang, H. Wu, Q. Zhang, Y. Peng, C. Ding, J. Lyu, X. Li, Chem. Commun., 2025, 61, 5822-5825.
[163]	J. Lyu, G. Mo, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, Q. Zhang, D. Jiang, Q. Wang, G. Zhang, C. Ding, X. Li, Catal. Lett., 2025, 155, 233.
[164]	Y. Duan, Y. Xia, Y. Ling, S. Zhou, X. Liu, Y. Lan, X. Yin, Y. Yang, X. Yan, M. Liang, S. Hong, L. Zhang, L. Wang, ACS Nano, 2024, 18, 21326-21335.
[165]	H. Liang, B. Zhang, P. Gao, X. Yu, X. Liu, X. Yang, H. Wu, L. Zhai, S. Zhao, G. Wang, A. P. van Bavel, Y. Qin, Chem Catal., 2022, 2, 610-621.
[166]	M. Li, C. Zhang, Y. Tang, Q. Chen, W. Li, Z. Han, S. Chen, C. Lv, Y. Yan, Y. Zhang, W. Zheng, P. Wang, X. Guo, W. Ding, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 11960-11973.
[167]	Q. Gan, J. Zhang, Y. Cao, S. Xu, P. He, H. Li, R. Liu, L. Wang, Carbon, 2025, 240, 120328.
[168]	Y. Lin, R. Nie, Y. Li, X. Wu, J. Yu, S. Xie, Y. Shen, S. Mao, Y. Chen, D. Lu, Z. Bao, Q. Yang, Q. Ren, Y. Yang, F. Liu, L. Qi, W. Huang, Z. Zhang, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 10006-10013.
[169]	H. Jin, P. Li, P. Cui, J. Shi, W. Zhou, X. Yu, W. Song, C. Cao, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 723.
[170]	F. Cao, W. Ni, Q. Zhao, L. Wang, S. Xue, Y. Li, D. Kong, M. Wu, L. Zhi, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 346, 123762.
[171]	H. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Li, X. Lan, B. Ali, T. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 34021-34031.
[172]	X. Liu, C. Wang, J. Meng, X. Yue, Q. Wang, J. Lu, J. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Zong, X. Jiang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2023, 34, 108745.
[173]	Y. Gu, A. Wu, L. Wang, D. Wang, H. Yan, P. Yu, Y. Xie, C. Tian, F. Sun, H. Fu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 4807-4815.
[174]	L. Zhang, N. Shang, S. Gao, J. Wang, T. Meng, C. Du, T. Shen, J. Huang, Q. Wu, H. Wang, Y. Qiao, C. Wang, Y. Gao, Z. Wang, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 8672-8682.
[175]	Y. Guo, F. Liu, L. Feng, X. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Liang, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 429, 132150.
[176]	J. Zhang, C. Zheng, M. Zhang, Y. Qiu, Q. Xu, W.-C. Cheong, W. Chen, L. Zheng, L. Gu, Z. Hu, D. Wang, Y. Li, Nano Res., 2020, 13, 3082-3087.
[177]	X. Zhang, H. Lin, J. Zhang, Y. Qiu, Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, G. Meng, W. Yan, L. Gu, L. Zheng, D. Wang, Y. Li, Chem. Sci., 2021, 12, 14599-14605.
[178]	Z. Liu, Z. Ren, J. Li, R. Jiang, W. Ma, S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, B.-L. Su, J. Zhang,, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2025, 13, 815-822.
[179]	Q. Zhao, D. Xu, L. Wang, S. Cui, Q. Liu, X. Han, Z. Wang, H. Ning, M. Wu, J. Alloys Compd., 2025, 1012, 178488.
[180]	W.-C. Cheong, W. Yang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, D. Zhao, S. Liu, K. Wu, Q. Liu, C. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Peng, C. Chen, Y. Li,, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 33819-33824.
[181]	S. Tian, M. Hu, Q. Xu, W. Gong, W. Chen, J. Yang, Y. Zhu, C. Chen, J. He, Q. Liu, H. Zhao, D. Wang, Y. Li, Sci. China Mater., 2021, 64, 642-650.
[182]	Y. Jiang, Y. Sung, C. Choi, G. Joo Bang, S. Hong, X. Tan, T.-S. Wu, Y.-L. Soo, P. Xiong, M. Meng-Jung Li, L. Hao, Y. Jung, Z. Sun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202203836.
[183]	W. Meng, X. Sui, Y. Liu, Y. He, H. Yuan, X. Zhu, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhou,, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 366, 125033.
[184]	H. Yao, Y. Qin, G. Qi, Y. Niu, D. Huang, W. Li, L. Pan, D. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2025, 713, 164317.
[185]	Z. Tao, H. Yao, G. Qi, H. Li, Y. Qin, L. Cui, L. Pan, D. Li, W. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 515, 163867.
[186]	J. Li, J. Ge, Y. Zhao, G. Wang, W. Sui, A. Mahmud Parvez, C. Si, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 496, 154315.
[187]	Y. Ling, H. Ge, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Duan, M. Liang, Y. Guo, T.-S. Wu, Y.-L. Soo, X. Yin, L. Ding, L. Wang, Adv. Sci., 2022, 9, 2202144.
[188]	M. Liu, C. Miao, Y. Fo, W. Wang, Y. Ning, S. Chu, W. Song, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Wu, W. Luo, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 71, 308-318.
[189]	T. Guo, Y. Luo, H. Li, S. Huang, Y. Zhang, Z. Huang, H. Hu, T. Gan, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 500, 156659.
[190]	J. Lyu, X. Zhang, Z. Luo, Y. Jiang, K. Xing, G. Zhang, C. Ding, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2025, 367, e202400889.
[191]	D. Chen, B. Chu, F. Li, Y.-T. Zheng, Y. Lu, B. Shao, L. Li, N.-Y. Huang, Q. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 22705-22713.
[192]	A. García-Baldoví, M. Cabrero Antonino, L. Peng, L. Tian, S. Goberna-Ferrón, G. Sastre, H. García, M. Antonietti, A. Primo, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 9584-9596.
[193]	S.-S. Zhang, J. Yi, T. Cao, J.-P. Guan, J.-Q. Sun, Q.-Y. Zhao, Y.-J. Qiu, C.-L. Ye, Y. Xiong, G. Meng, W. Chen, Z. Lin, J. Zhang, Small, 2023, 19, 2206052.
[194]	J. Audevard, J. Navarro-Ruiz, V. Bernardin, R. Philippe, A. Corrias, Y. Tison, A. Favre-Réguillon, I. Del Rosal, I. C. Gerber, P. Serp, J. Catal., 2023, 425, 245-259.
[195]	X. Song, F. Shao, Z. Zhao, X. Li, Z. Wei, J. Wang, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 14846-14855.
[196]	Y. Zhang, J. Yan, R. You, M. He, L. Wang, M. Liang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 628, 157382.
[197]	F. Huang, M. Peng, Y. Chen, X. Cai, X. Qin, N. Wang, D. Xiao, L. Jin, G. Wang, X.-D. Wen, H. Liu, D. Ma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 18485-18493.
[198]	C. Sui, W. Dong, M. Wang, F. Huang, S. Xiang, J. Chen, C. Li, M. Peng, N. Wang, D. Ma, H. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 19808-19816.
[199]	J. Song, X. Cai, Z. Chen, T. Wang, S. Xi, Q. Hu, N. Yan, K. P. Loh, Chem. Sci., 2024, 15, 10577-10584.
[200]	H. Liu, P. Zhu, D. Yang, C. Zhong, J. Li, X. Liang, L. Wang, H. Yin, D. Wang, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 2132-2140.
[201]	D. Sun, Q. Bi, M. Deng, B. Jia, F. Huang, Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 5670-5673.
[202]	Y.-X. Zhang, Y.-J. Ma, Y.-J. Zhao, Z.-Y. Wang, C.-X. Yu, X.-Q. Li, L.-L. Liu, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2024, 11, 8725-8736.
[203]	P. Deng, J. Duan, F. Liu, N. Yang, H. Ge, J. Gao, H. Qi, D. Feng, M. Yang, Y. Qin, Y. Ren, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202307853.
[204]	D. Park, S. Hong, J. Han, Y. Kim, M. Park, B. Lee, Y. Song, H. Y. Koo, S. Yang, W. B. Lee, J. Y. Park, Appl. Catal. B 2025, 365, 124987.
[205]	H. T. Ngan, G. Yan, J. E. S. van der Hoeven, R. J. Madix, C. M. Friend, P. Sautet, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 13321-13333.
[206]	X. Ge, Y. Jing, N. Fei, K. Yan, Y. Liang, Y. Cao, J. Zhang, G. Qian, L. Li, H. Jiang, X. Zhou, W. Yuan, X. Duan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202410979.
[207]	Z. Sun, C. Li, J. Lin, T. Guo, S. Song, Y. Hu, Z. Zhang, W. Yan, Y. Wang, Z. Wei, F. Zhang, K. Zheng, D. Wang, Z. Li, S. Wang, W. Chen, ACS Nano, 2024, 18, 13286-13297.
[208]	M. Zhong, J. Zhao, Y. Fang, D. Wu, L. Zhang, C. Du, S. Liu, S. Yang, S. Wan, Y. Jiang, J. Huang, H. Xiong, Appl. Catal. A, 2023, 662, 119288.
[209]	M. R. Hossain, M. Trenary, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2024, 128, 19204-19209.
[210]	W. Liu, H. Feng, Y. Yang, Y. Niu, L. Wang, P. Yin, S. Hong, B. Zhang, X. Zhang, M. Wei, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 3188.
[211]	H. Feng, W. Liu, L. Wang, E. Xu, D. Pang, Z. Ren, S. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Deng, T. Liu, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, F. Li, M. Wei, Adv. Sci., 2024, 11, 2304908.
[212]	Z. Yu, C. Zhao, Z. Xiong, Z. Xiao, M. He, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, P. Wu, W. Guo, N. Zhang, M. Liang, Mol. Catal., 2024, 569, 114631.
[213]	P. V. Markov, G. O. Bragina, N. S. Smirnova, G. N. Baeva, I. S. Mashkovsky, E. Y. Gerasimov, A. V. Bukhtiyarov, Y. V. Zubavichus, A. Y. Stakheev, Inorganics, 2023, 11, 150.
[214]	J. Huang, C. Gao, S. Liu, X. Du, W. Zhou, C. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 504, 158731.
[215]	M. J. Islam, M. Granollers Mesa, A. Osatiashtiani, J. C. Manayil, M. A. Isaacs, M. J. Taylor, S. Tsatsos, G. Kyriakou, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 299, 120652.
[216]	M. J. Taylor, S. K. Beaumont, M. J. Islam, S. Tsatsos, C. A. M. Parlett, M. A. Issacs, G. Kyriakou, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 284, 119737.
[217]	K. Ji, M. Xu, S.-M. Xu, Y. Wang, R. Ge, X. Hu, X. Sun, H. Duan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202209849.
[218]	T. Gan, Y. Liu, Q. He, H. Zhang, X. He, H. Ji, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2020, 8, 8692-8699.
[219]	M. J. Islam, M. Granollers Mesa, A. Osatiashtiani, M. J. Taylor, M. A. Isaacs, G. Kyriakou, Nanomaterials, 2023, 13, 1434.
[220]	V. Giulimondi, S. Mitchell, J. Pérez-Ramírez, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 2981-2997.
[221]	T. Ying, R. Zhu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, DOI:10.1002/adfm.202515026.
[222]	Y.-Q. Su, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, J.-X. Liu, V. Muravev, K. Alexopoulos, I. A. W. Filot, D. G. Vlachos, E. J. M. Hensen, NPJ Comput. Mater., 2020, 6, 144.
[223]	W. Li, Z. Guo, J. Yang, Y. Li, X. Sun, H. He, S. Li, J. Zhang, Electrochem. Energy Rev., 2022, 5, 9.
[224]	B. Singh, V. Sharma, R. P. Gaikwad, P. Fornasiero, R. Zbořil, M. B. Gawande, Small, 2021, 17, 2006473.
[225]	V. B. Saptal, V. Ruta, M. A. Bajada, G. Vilé, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202219306.
[226]	M. A. Bajada, M. Tschulkow, G. Vilé, Cell Rep. Sustain., 2025, 2, 100286.

迈向高效选择性加氢: 单原子催化剂的作用

Towards highly efficient selective hydrogenation: The role of single-atom catalysts

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 24

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋鑫, 李中华, 盛利, 刘扬. 单原子催化剂中自旋密度对称性破缺介导的析氢反应[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 213-226.
[2]	王刚, Imran Muhammad, 阎慧敏, 李隽, 王阳刚. 用杂原子调控Ni单原子催化剂的局部环境以实现高效CO₂电还原[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 120-129.
[3]	王尔玉, 褚艺淳, 张文君, 魏彦平, 司传领, Regina Palkovits, 吴新平, 陈祖鹏. 利用Pt-C₃N₄单原子催化剂实现木质纤维素光重整共生产H₂与乳酸[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 308-318.
[4]	胡晓春, 陶龙刚, 雷坤, 孙志强, 谭明务. 揭示TiO₂相效应对Pt单原子催化剂高效CO₂转化的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 186-195.
[5]	胡呈弘, 张悦, 张仪, 黄沁彤, 沈葵, 陈立宇, 李映伟. Sn电子调节器增强Fe位点电催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 222-229.
[6]	刘粉利, 杨曼, 段江林, 殷祉钰, 史名扬, 陈馥清, 熊惠峰, 刘忻, 刘文刚, 夏琦兴, 孙少东, 冯丹, 齐海峰, 覃勇, 任煜京. 外围氮空位诱导电子传递至Fe单原子以实现高效的氧气活化过程[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 187-198.
[7]	张朋祥, 王佳雯, 杨天宇, 王瑞哲, 沈若凡, 彭智昆, 刘艳艳, 武现丽, 蒋剑春, 李保军. 揭示复杂性: 析氧反应机理研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 48-83.
[8]	贺捷婷, 梁瑜, 赵斌彬, 刘雷, 何迁, 王定胜, 董晋湘. CaAl-LDH层板金属元素同晶取代构建高密度单原子催化剂用于N-杂芳烃选择性加氢[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 70(3): 353-362.
[9]	班涛, 王建伟, 余希阳, 田海阔, 高新, 黄正清, 常春然. 机器学习辅助筛选SA-FLP双活性位催化剂用于甲烷与水共转化制甲醇反应[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 70(3): 311-321.
[10]	崔嘉轶, 余新涛, 李学瑶, 余建敏, 彭立山, 魏子栋. M-N-C单原子催化剂自旋调控及其电催化应用研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 69(2): 17-34.
[11]	李阳阳, 杨静怡, 乔波涛, 张涛. 尺寸依赖的金属载体相互作用调控Pt/CoFe₂O₄催化反应性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 69(2): 292-302.
[12]	徐余幸, 王雷雷, 刘琴, 滕波涛, 武传强, 葛炳辉, 毕文团, 顾明慧, 张梦凯, 严欢, 路军岭. 催化剂精准制备与理论计算相结合揭示CO₂电化学还原反应中Ni单原子催化剂活性位结构[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 79(12): 68-77.
[13]	赵天佑, 胡凤鸣, 朱美琦, 杨昌杰, 汪新宇, 潘永周, 杨嘉睿, 张霞, 李文豪, 王定胜. 单原子催化剂在便携式能源与传感器技术中的未来发展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 78(11): 100-137.
[14]	齐海峰, Graham J. Hutchings. 原位SEIRAS技术用于动态单原子催化研究[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 77(10): 1-3.
[15]	贡立圆, 陶李, 王雷, 符显珠, 王双印. 高温质子交换膜燃料电池阴极抗磷酸中毒催化剂的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 68(1): 155-176.