锌镉硫量子点增强的光催化产氢活性

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63614-2

催化学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 15-24.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63614-2

锌镉硫量子点增强的光催化产氢活性

高荣荣^a, 程蓓^a^,^*(), 范佳杰^b, 余家国^a, WingkeiHo^c^,^#()

^a武汉理工大学材料复合新技术国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉430070
^b郑州大学材料科学与工程学院, 河南郑州450001
^c香港教育大学科学与环境学系, 香港

收稿日期:2020-03-07 接受日期:2020-04-24 出版日期:2021-01-18 发布日期:2021-01-18
通讯作者: 程蓓,WingkeiHo
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1502001);国家自然科学基金(21871217);国家自然科学基金(U1905215);国家自然科学基金(51961135303);国家自然科学基金(51932007);国家自然科学基金(U1705251);武汉理工大学材料复合新技术国家重点实验室创新基金(2017-ZD-4)

Zn_xCd_1-_xS quantum dot with enhanced photocatalytic H₂-production performance

Rongrong Gao^a, Bei Cheng^a^,^*(), Jiajie Fan^b, Jiaguo Yu^a, Wingkei Ho^c^,^#()

^aState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
^bSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
^cDepartment of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Received:2020-03-07 Accepted:2020-04-24 Online:2021-01-18 Published:2021-01-18
Contact: Bei Cheng,Wingkei Ho
About author:^#E-mail: keithho@ied.edu.hk
^*E-mail: chengbei2013@whut.edu.cn;
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFB1502001);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21871217);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1905215);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51961135303);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51932007);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1705251);Innovative Research Funds of SKLWUT(2017-ZD-4)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

光催化分解水产氢是利用太阳能解决当今能源危机和环境污染问题的理想策略. 硫化镉光催化剂由于具有较窄的带隙、有效的光吸收能力、较负的导带位置和较强的还原能力等而受到广泛关注. 然而, 硫化镉光催化剂的光生电子-空穴复合速率高, 导致其光催化活性比较低, 因此在光催化领域的应用受到限制. 为此, 人们采取了很多方法来改善硫化镉光催化剂的光催化性能, 例如加入助催化剂、构建异质结、表面修饰以及形成固溶体光催化剂等.
合成固溶体光催化剂被认为是提高硫化镉光催化活性最具有发展前景的方法之一, 固溶体光催化剂通过形成轨道杂化而表现出可控的带隙和带边位置. 在固溶体光催化剂中, 锌镉硫胶体量子点引起了很多关注. 锌镉硫胶体量子点的颗粒尺寸较小, 这就使得光生电子和空穴由催化剂内部转移到表面的距离较短, 增大了载流子分离效率. 另外, 锌镉硫胶体量子点具有较负的导带位置、可调控的带隙、较好的水中分散性以及良好的光吸收等优点, 因此锌镉硫胶体量子点从其他光催化剂中脱颖而出.
本文分别采用热注法和传统共沉淀法制备了油溶性锌镉硫量子点和水溶性锌镉硫纳米颗粒. 发现油溶性量子点亲水性能较差, 几乎没有光催化活性, 但油溶性量子点易通过配体交换过程转换成水溶性量子点, 无机硫作为锌镉硫量子点的表面水溶性配体, 可使量子点具有较好的亲水性. 通过电化学测试、稳态荧光以及时间分辨荧光测试结果表明, 相比于锌镉硫纳米颗粒, 水溶性锌镉硫量子点具有更高的电子空穴分离效率. 光催化产氢测试发现, 在牺牲剂甘油存在的条件下, 水溶性锌镉硫量子点的光催化产氢速率(1220 μmol g ^-1 h^-1)显著提高, 约是锌镉硫纳米颗粒产氢速率的10倍. 加入助催化剂Ni²⁺后, 锌镉硫量子点表现出最高的光催化产氢活性(2253 μmol g ^-1 h^-1), 在420 nm灯的光照条件下, 表观量子效率达到15.9%. 光催化活性的增大主要归因于量子点较小的颗粒尺寸、表面无机硫配体以及助催化剂的添加, 这些都有利于载流子的快速分离和转移, 降低其复合, 延长其寿命, 并且加速了产氢动力学, 因此提高了水溶性锌镉硫量子点的光催化产氢活性.

关键词: 锌镉硫化合物, 固溶体光催化剂, 光催化产氢, 油溶性量子点, 水溶性量子点

Abstract:

H₂ is an important energy carrier for replacing fossil fuel in the future due to its high energy density and environmental friendliness. As a sustainable H₂-generation method, photocatalytic H₂ production by water splitting has attracted much interest. Here, oil-soluble Zn_xCd_1-_xS quantum dot (ZCS QD) with a uniform particle size distribution were prepared by a hot-injection method. However, no photocatalytic H₂-production activity was observed for the oil-soluble ZCS QD due to its hydrophobicity. Thus, the oil-soluble ZCS QD was converted into a water-soluble ZCS QD by a ligand-exchange method. The water-soluble ZCS QD exhibited excellent photocatalytic H₂-production performance in the presence of glycerin and Ni²⁺, with an apparent quantum efficiency of 15.9% under irradiation of 420 nm light. Further, the photocatalytic H₂-generation activity of the ZCS QD was ~10.7 times higher than that of the Zn_xCd_1-_xS relative samples prepared by the conventional co-precipitation method. This work will inspire the design and fabrication of other semiconductor QD photocatalysts because QD exhibits excellent separation efficiency for photogenerated electron-hole pairs due to its small crystallite size.

Key words: ZnxCd1-xS, Solid-solution photocatalyst, Photocatalytic H2 production, Oil-soluble quantum dot, Water-oil soluble quantum dot

高荣荣, 程蓓, 范佳杰, 余家国, WingkeiHo. 锌镉硫量子点增强的光催化产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(1): 15-24.

Rongrong Gao, Bei Cheng, Jiajie Fan, Jiaguo Yu, Wingkei Ho. Zn_xCd_1-_xS quantum dot with enhanced photocatalytic H₂-production performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(1): 15-24.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63614-2

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2021/V42/I1/15

图/表 10

Fig. 1. The schematic illustration of the ligand-exchange process for ZCS QD.

Fig. 2. The XRD patterns of ZCS QD and ZCS RS.

Fig. 3. The TEM (a,c) and high-resolution TEM (b,d) images of ZCS QD (a,b) and ZCS RS (c,d).

Fig. 4. (a) UV-vis diffuse reflection spectra, (b) Kubelka-Munk function vs. photon energy curves, and Mott-Schottky plots of ZCS QD (c) and ZCS RS (d).

Fig. 5. (a) The survey spectra, (b) Zn 2p, (c) Cd 3d, (d) S 2p high-resolution XPS spectra of the ZCS QD and ZCS RS.

Fig. 6. (a) Steady-state photoluminescence (PL), (b) time-resolved PL spectra, (c) transient photocurrent responses, and (d) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) spectra of the ZCS QD and ZCS RS.

Table 1 Fitted parameters obtained from the decay curves of the samples.

Samples	τ₁(ns) (Rel. %)	τ₂(ns) (Rel. %)	τ₃(ns) (Rel. %)	τ_a(ns)
ZCS QD	0.26 (29.24%)	4.22 (24.03%)	16.61 (46.73%)	8.9
ZCS RS	0.24 (65.38%)	3.02 (21.88%)	13.46 (12.74%)	2.5

Fig. 7. (a) Photocatalytic H2-production rates of ZCS RS, RS-1% Ni, QD, and QD-1% Ni. (b) Photocatalytic H2 production over time for the ZCS QD and RS with 1% Ni.

Table 2 Comparisons of the photocatalytic H2-production performance of various ZnxCd1-xS-based photocatalysts.

Photocatalysts	Sacrifice agent	Light	Yield (μmol g^-1 h^-1)	Ref.
Zn_xCd_1-_xS-1% Ni	Glycerol	300 W Xe lamp	2253	This work
RGO/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	300 W Xe lamp	770	[59]
SiC/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	586 mW/cm² Xe lamp	894	[60]
P-Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S	HMF	30 × 3W LED	419	[61]
Cu₂S/Zn_0.71Cd_0.29S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	100 mW/cm² Xe lamp	1202	[62]
Ni₃C/Zn_0.3Cd_0.7S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	300 W Xe lamp	3310.1	[63]
Hierarchical Zn_0.64Cd_0.36S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	300 W Xe lamp	815	[64]
GO/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	150 W Xe lamp	1060	[65]
RGO/Zn_0.8Cd_0.2S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	100 mW/cm² Xe lamp	1824	[57]
CoPt₃/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S	Na₂S-Na₂SO₃	300 W	2830	[66]

Fig. 8. (a) Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic H2 production. (b) The schematic illustration of the difference in transfer distance of carriers for ZCS QD and RS.

参考文献

[1]	S. Wang, B. Zhu, M. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Yu, M. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 243, 19-26.
[2]	R. Shen, J. Xie, Q. Xiang, X. Chen, J. Jiang, X. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 240-288.
[3]	X. Zhao, J. Feng, J. Liu, W. Shi, G. Yang, G.-C. Wang, P. Cheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 9790-9794.
[4]	J. Zhang, S. Wageh, A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 192, 101-107.
[5]	Y. Tang, P. Zhou, Y. Chao, F. Lin, J. Lai, H. Li, S. Guo, Sci. China Mater., 2019, 62, 351-358.
[6]	G.-Q. Zhang, W. Ou, Y.-S. Xu, Sci. China Mater., 2018, 61, 1001-1006.
[7]	A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238, 37-38.
[8]	A. Meng, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1807660.
[9]	C. Li, W. Yang, Q. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34, 969-975.
[10]	K. Wang, B. Liu, J. Li, X. Liu, Y. Zhou, X. Zhang, X. Bi, X. Jiang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35, 615-622.
[11]	F. Xiao, W. Zhou, B. Sun, H. Li, P. Qiao, L. Ren, X. Zhao, H. Fu, Sci. China Mater., 2018, 61, 822-830.
[12]	Y. Dou, R. Zhou, L. Wan, H. Niu, J. Zhou, J. Xu, G. Cao, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 12598-12601.
[13]	T. Di, B. Cheng, W. Ho, J. Yu, H. Tang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 470, 196-204.
[14]	C. Bie, B. Zhu, F. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1902868.
[15]	H. Wang, S. B. Naghadeh, C. Li, L. Ying, A. L. Allen, J. Zhang, Sci. China Mater., 2018, 61, 839-850.
[16]	F. Xu, J. Zhang, B. Zhu, J. Yu, J. Xu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 230, 194-202.
[17]	W. Yu, S. Zhang, J. Chen, P. Xia, M. H. Richter, L. Chen, W. Xu, J. Jin, S. Chen, T. Peng, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 15668-15674.
[18]	Q. Li, X. Li, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1500010.
[19]	T. Di, B. Zhu, J. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 389, 775-782.
[20]	T. Di, Q. Xu, W. Ho, H. Tang, Q. Xiang, J. Yu, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 1394-1411.
[21]	Z. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Qiao, D. Hou, D. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 371-379.
[22]	H. Li, S. Xiao, J. Zhou, J. Zhao, F. Liu, G. Li, D. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 2741-2744.
[23]	D. Lang, F. Cheng, Q. Xiang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 6207-6216.
[24]	H. Ge, F. Xu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, W. Ho, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 6301-6309.
[25]	W. Zhong, S. Shen, M. He, D. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Lin, W. Tu, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 258, 117967.
[26]	Y. Ren, D. Zeng, W. Ong, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 289-319.
[27]	Z. Zhao, Y. Xing, H. Li, P. Feng, Z. Sun, Sci. China Mater., 2018, 61, 851-860.
[28]	F. He, A. Meng, B. Cheng, W. Ho, J. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41, 9-20.
[29]	Y. Zhang, L. Luo, Z. Shi, X. Shen, C, Peng, J. Liu, Z. Chen, Q. Chen, L. Zhang, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 2855-2863.
[30]	F. Cheng, H. Yin, Q. Xiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 432-439.
[31]	S. Cao, Y. Chen, C. Wang, X. Lv, W. Fu, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 8708-8711.
[32]	D. Ren, R. Shen, Z. Jiang, X. Lu, X. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41, 31-40.
[33]	H. She, X. Ma, Z. Zhao, L. Wang, J. Huang, C. Li, Q. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 489, 426-426.
[34]	P. Wang, S. Xu, F. Chen, H. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 343-351.
[35]	Q. Li, T. Shi, X. Li, K. Lv, M. Li, F. Liu, H. Li, M. Lei, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 229, 8-14.
[36]	H. Zhao, Y. He, M. Liu, R. Wang, Y. Li, W. You, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 495-501.
[37]	Z. Wei, M. Xu, J. Liu, W. Guo, Z. Jiang, W. Shangguan, Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41, 103-113.
[38]	Q. Li, H. Meng, P. Zhou, Y. Zheng, J. Wang, J. Yu, J. Gong, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 882-889.
[39]	G. Yu, W. Zhang, Y. Sun, T. Xie, A. Ren, X. Zhou, G. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 13803-13808.
[40]	X. Fan, S. Yu, H. Wu, Z. Li, Y. Gao, X. Li, L. Zhang, C. Tung, L. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 16328-16332.
[41]	D. Wang, L. Wang, A. Xu, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 2046-2053.
[42]	M. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Ren, E. Liu, J. Fan, X. Hu, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 752, 260-266.
[43]	C. Duan, W. Luo, T. Jiu, J. Li, Y. Wang, F. Lu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 512, 353-360.
[44]	X. Zhong, Y. Feng, W. Knoll, M. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 13559-13563.
[45]	Z. Li, X. Fan, X. Li, J. Li, F. Zhan, Y. Tao, X. Zhang, Q. Kong, N. Zhao, J. Zhang, C. Ye, Y. Gao, X. Wang, Q. Meng, K. Feng, B. Chen, C. Tung, L. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 10365-10373.
[46]	T. Xu, J. Hu, Y. Yang, W. Que, X. Yin, H. Wu, L. Chen, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 734, 196-203.
[47]	Y. Wu, X. Ye, S. Zhang, S. Meng, X. Fu, X. Wang, X. Zhang, S. Chen, J. Catal., 2018, 359, 151-160.
[48]	Q. Liang, S. Cui, S. Xu, C. Yao, M. J. MacLachlan, Z. Li, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 3391-3394.
[49]	J. Fu, B. Zhu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, W. You, J. Yu, Small, 2017, 13, 1603938.
[50]	Q. Li, Y. Xia, C. Yang, K. Lv, M. Lei, M. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 349, 287-296.
[51]	C. Bie, J. Fu, B. Cheng, L. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 462, 606-614.
[52]	C. Zhang, H. Liu, W. Wang, H. Qian, S. Cheng, Y. Wang, Z. Zha, Y. Zhong, Y. Hu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 239, 309-316.
[53]	P. Xia, M. Liu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, L. Zhang, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 8945-8953.
[54]	S. Yu, X. Fan, X. Wang, J. Li, Q. Zhang, A. Xia, S. Wei, L. Wu, Y. Zhou, G. R. Patzke, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 4009.
[55]	R. Shen, J. Xie, X. Lu, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 4026-4036.
[56]	M. Liu, P. Xia, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 10472-10480.
[57]	J. Zhang, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, J. R. Gong, Nano Lett., 2012, 12, 4584-4589.
[58]	J. Ran, J. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Qiao, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 3426-3434.
[59]	S. Shen, A. Ma, Z. Tang, Z. Han, M. Wang, Z. Wang, L. Zhi, J. Yang, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 609-615.
[60]	S. Bai, H. Mei, Z. Jin, S. Xiao, L. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 500, 144009.
[61]	H. Ye, R. Shi, X. Yang, W. Fu, Y. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 233, 70-79.
[62]	C. Wang, J. Chang, S. Lu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 1305-1314.
[63]	Z. Luo, X. Zhao, H. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Appl. Catal. A, 2019, 582, 117115.
[64]	L. Pei, J. Liu, Y. Xu, Y. Han, J. Wu, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 809, 151869.
[65]	Q. Li, H. Meng, J. Yu, W. Xiao, Y. Zheng, J. Wang, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 1176-1185.
[66]	H. Wang, Y. Li, D. Shu, X. Chen, X. Liu, X. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Wang, Int. J. Energy Res., 2016, 40, 1280-1286.
[67]	D. Ma, J. Shi, Y. Zou, Z. Fan, X. Ji, C. Niu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 25377-25386.

锌镉硫量子点增强的光催化产氢活性

Zn_xCd_1-_xS quantum dot with enhanced photocatalytic H₂-production performance

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 10

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘博文, 蔡家杰, 张建军, 谭海燕, 程蓓, 许景三. MOF/CdS梯型光催化剂同时进行苯甲醇氧化和析氢反应及其机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 204-215.
[2]	李宁, 高雪云, 苏俊珲, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 类金属WO₂/g-C₃N₄复合光催化剂的构造及其优异的光催化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 161-170.
[3]	解志鹏, 杨修贝, 张沛, 柯夏婷, 袁昕, 翟黎鹏, 王文滨, 秦娜, 崔乘幸, 屈凌波, 陈雄. 具有可控载流子动力学的烯烃连接的共价有机框架用于高效太阳能光催化制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 171-180.
[4]	胡海均, 张开来, 闫格, 史丽童, 贾宝华, 黄洪伟, 张宇, 孙晓东, 马天翼. 通过孔道功能化策略将CdS精准修饰到Zr-MOFs表面构筑高效光解水催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2332-2341.
[5]	钟威, 许家超, 王苹, 朱必成, 范佳杰, 余火根. 新型核壳Ag@AgSe_x纳米粒子析氢助剂: 原位表面硒化以提升TiO₂的光催化产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1074-1083.
[6]	冯业芹, 秦琳, 张峻豪, 符方玉, 李慧杰, 相华, 吕红金. 轮型二十核铜取代多金属氧酸盐催化剂: 光催化制氢的机理和稳定性研究[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 442-450.
[7]	许家超, 高朵朵, 余火根, 王苹, 朱必成, 王临曦, 范佳杰. 新型钯-铜纳米点析氢助催化剂: 优化界面氢脱附以实现高效光催化活性[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 215-225.
[8]	丁超, 赵呈孝, 成石, 杨小飞. 一维硫化镉/二维二硫化钨纳米异质结用于超高活性光催化制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 403-409.
[9]	于晓慧, 苏海伟, 邹建平, 刘芹芹, 王乐乐, 唐华. 利用掺杂诱导的金属-N活性位点和带隙调控提升石墨相氮化碳的光催化产氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 421-432.
[10]	李金懋, 吴聪聪, 李矜, 董兵海, 赵丽, 王世敏. 1D/2D TiO₂/ZnIn₂S₄ S型异质结光催化剂及其高效制氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 339-349.
[11]	李华鹏, 孙彬, 高婷婷, 李欢, 任永强, 周国伟. Ti₃C₂ MXene助催化剂组装的介孔TiO₂用以增强光催化甲基橙降解和产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 461-471.
[12]	梁子展, 沈荣晨, 张鹏, 李佑稷, 李能, 李鑫. 全有机COF/PUP S型光催化剂分解水制氢的性能研究[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(10): 2581-2591.
[13]	王乐乐, 杨涛, 彭李杰, 张琪琪, 佘希林, 唐华, 刘芹芹. 2D/2D/2D三明治结构ZnIn₂S₄/g-C₃N₄/Ti₃C₂ Mxene S型异质结-肖特基结双通道电荷转移路径促进的光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(10): 2720-2731.
[14]	刘芹芹, 何旭东, 彭进军, 于晓慧, 唐华, 张军. 热电子驱动氧化钨/石墨化氮化碳S-型异质结实现宽光谱光催化产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(9): 1478-1487.
[15]	Khakemin Khan, 徐丽粉, 石明, 曲江珊, 陶晓萍, 冯兆池, 李灿, 李仁贵. 表面组装钴物种同时促进Cd_0.9Zn_0.1S光催化剂的界面电荷分离和表面反应[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(6): 1004-1012.

锌镉硫量子点增强的光催化产氢活性

ZnxCd1-xS quantum dot with enhanced photocatalytic H2-production performance

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 10

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

Zn_xCd_1-_xS quantum dot with enhanced photocatalytic H₂-production performance