电子受体H2O2和O2对TiO2光催化甘油氧化反应中活性氧物种1O2和OH·的影响

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62519-6

催化学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1975-1981.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62519-6

电子受体H₂O₂和O₂对TiO₂光催化甘油氧化反应中活性氧物种¹O₂和OH^·的影响

Trin Jedsukontorn^a, Vissanu Meeyoo^b, Nagahiro Saito^c, Mali Hunsom^a,d

a 朱拉隆功大学科学学院化工系燃料研究中心, 曼谷 10330, 泰国;
b 马汉科理工大学高级材料与环境研究中心, 曼谷 10530, 泰国;
c 名古屋大学大学院工学研究科与智能移动协作研究中心, 名古屋, 日本;
d 朱拉隆功大学石油化学与材料工程卓越中心(PETRO-MAT), 曼谷 10330, 泰国

收稿日期:2016-06-01 修回日期:2016-07-18 出版日期:2016-11-25 发布日期:2016-11-25
通讯作者: Mali Hunsom,Tel:+66(2)2187523-5; Fax:+66(2)2555831; E-mail:mali.h@chula.ac.th

Effect of electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the generated reactive oxygen species ¹O₂ and OH^· in TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxidation of glycerol

Trin Jedsukontorn^a, Vissanu Meeyoo^b, Nagahiro Saito^c, Mali Hunsom^a,d

a Fuels Research Center, Department of Chemical Technology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;
b Centre for Advanced Materials and Environmental Research, Mahanakorn University of Technology, Bangkok 10530, Thailand;
c Graduate School of Engineering & Green Mobility Collaborative Research Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan;
d Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology (PETRO-MAT), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

Received:2016-06-01 Revised:2016-07-18 Online:2016-11-25 Published:2016-11-25
Contact: Mali Hunsom,Tel:+66(2)2187523-5; Fax:+66(2)2555831; E-mail:mali.h@chula.ac.th

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在室温条件下研究了电子受体H₂O₂和O₂对TiO₂光催化甘油氧化反应中的活性氧物种、甘油转化率和产物分布的影响.当在紫外光辐射和TiO₂的体系中不存在电子受体时，只产生HO^·自由基.而当在此体系中有电子受体存在时，则产生了HO^·自由基和¹O₂，但它们的浓度不同，这取决于电子受体的浓度.以H₂O₂为电子受体时甘油转化率的提高大于以O₂为电子受体时.甘油转化生成有价值产物的类型则与体系中的活性氧物种浓度有关.

关键词: 甘油氧化, 二氧化钛, 光催化剂, 电子受体

Abstract:

The effect of the electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the type of generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), and glycerol conversion and product distribution in the TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxida-tion of glycerol was studied at ambient conditions. In the absence of an electron acceptor, only HO^· radicals were generated by irradiated UV light and TiO₂. However, in the presence of the two elec-tron acceptors, both HO^· radical and ¹O₂ were produced by irradiated UV light and TiO₂ in different concentrations that depended on the concentration of the electron acceptor. The use of H₂O₂ as an electron acceptor enhanced glycerol conversion more than O₂. The type of generated value-added compounds depended on the concentration of the generated ROS.

Key words: Glycerol oxidation, Titanium dioxide, Photocatalyst, Electron acceptor

Trin Jedsukontorn, Vissanu Meeyoo, Nagahiro Saito, Mali Hunsom. 电子受体H₂O₂和O₂对TiO₂光催化甘油氧化反应中活性氧物种¹O₂和OH^·的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2016, 37(11): 1975-1981.

Trin Jedsukontorn, Vissanu Meeyoo, Nagahiro Saito, Mali Hunsom. Effect of electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the generated reactive oxygen species ¹O₂ and OH^· in TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxidation of glycerol[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 37(11): 1975-1981.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62519-6

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2016/V37/I11/1975

参考文献

[1] H. Ueoka, T. Katayama, US Patent 6288287, 2001.
[2] J. Ftouni, N. Villandier, F. Auneau, M. Besson, L. Djakovitch, C. Pi-nel, Catal. Today, 2015, 257, 267-273.
[3] G. Y. Yang, Y. H. Ke, H. F. Ren, C. L. Liu, R. Z. Yang, W. S. Dong, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 283, 759-767.
[4] H. X. Yin, C. H. Zhang, H. B. Yin, D. Z. Gao, L. Q. Shen, A. L. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 288, 332-343.
[5] S. Thanasilp, J. W. Schwank, V. Meeyoo, S. Pengpanich, M. Hunsom, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 275, 113-124.
[6] S. Thanasilp, J. W. Schwank, V. Meeyoo, S. Pengpanich, M. Hunsom, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2013, 380, 49-56.
[7] K. Omata, K. Matsumoto, T. Murayama, W. Ueda, Catal. Today, 2016, 259, 205-212.
[8] R. Ciriminna, G. Palmisano, C. D. Pina, M. Rossi, M. Pagliaro, Tetra-hedron Lett., 2006, 47, 6993-6995.
[9] J. Luo, H. G. Li, N. Zhao, F. Wang, F. K. Xiao, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2015, 43, 677-683.
[10] P. K. Dikshit, V. S. Moholkar, Bioresour. Technol., 2016, 216, 1058-1065.
[11] X. M. Ning, Y. H. Li, H. Yu, F. Peng, H. J. Wang, Y. H. Yang, J. Catal., 2016, 335, 95-104.
[12] R. Estevez, S. Lopez-Pedrajas, F. Blanco-Bonilla, D. Luna, F. M. Bautista, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 282, 179-186.
[13] C. García-Sancho, J. A. Cecilia, A. Moreno-Ruiz, J. M. Mérida-Robles,J. Santamaría-González, R. Moreno-Tost, P. Maireles-Torres, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179, 139-149.
[14] A. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, N. A. S. Amin, Z. Y. Zakaria, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2016, 34, 300-312.
[15] M. Hunsom, P. Saila, Renew. Energy, 2015, 74, 227-236.
[16] C. R. Zanata, P. S. Fernández, H. E. Troiani, A. L. Soldati, R. Landers, G. A. Camara, A. E. Carvalho, C. A. Martins, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 181, 445-455.
[17] A. L. Linsebigler, G. Q. Lu, J. T. Yates, J. Chem. Res., 1995, 95, 735-758.
[18] V. Augugliaro, H. A. Hamed El Nazer, V. Loddo, A. Mele, G. Palmisano, L. Palmisano, S. Yurdakal, Catal. Today, 2010, 151, 21-28.
[19] C. Minero, A. Bedini, V. Maurino, Appl. Catal. B, 2012, 128, 135-143.
[20] R. F. Chong, J. Li, X. Zhou, Y. Ma, J. X. Yang, L. Huang, H. X. Han, F. X. Zhang, C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 165-167.
[21] C. H. Wu, Chemosphere, 2014, 57, 601-608.
[22] V. M. Daskalaki, P. Panagiotopoulou, D. I. Kondarides, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 170, 433-439.
[23] Slamet, D. Tristantini, Valentina, M. Ibadurrohman, Int. J. Energy Res., 2013, 37, 1372-1381.
[24] P. Panagiotopoulou, E. E. Karamerou, D. I. Kondarides, Catal. To-day, 2013, 209, 91-98.
[25] T. Hirakawa, K. Yawata, Y. Nosaka, Appl. Catal. A, 2007, 325, 105-111.
[26] X. Y. Guo, Q. L. Li, M. Zhang, M. C. Long, L. C. Kong, Q. X. Zhou, H. Q. Shao, W. L. Hu, T. T. Wei, Chemosphere, 2015, 120, 521-526.
[27] A. Maldotti, A. Molinari, R. Amadelli, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 3811-3836.
[28] D. R. Kearns, Chem. Rev., 1971, 71, 395-427.
[29] T. Daimon, T. Hirakawa, M. Kitazawa, J. Suetake, Y. Nosaka, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 340, 169-175.
[30] T. Jedsukontorn, V. Meeyoo, N. Saito, M. Hunsom, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 281, 252-264.
[31] W. Y. Han, P. Y. Zhang, W. P. Zhu, J. J. Yin, L. S. Li, Water Res., 2004, 38, 4197-4203.
[32] W. R. Haag, J. Hoigne, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1986, 20, 341-348.
[33] A. Yamakata, T. A. Ishibashi, H. Onishi, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 9820-9823.
[34] R. M. Gao, J. Stark, D. W. Bahnemann, J. Rabani, J. Photochem. Pho-tobiol. A, 2002, 148, 387-391.
[35] M. Stylidi, D. I. Kondarides, X. E. Verykios, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 47, 189-201.
[36] D. H. Tseng, L. C. Juang, H. H. Huang. Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012, 2012, 1-9.
[37] G. N. Nomikos, P. Panagiotopoulou, D. I. Kondarides, X. E. Verykios, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 146, 249-257.
[38] G. F. IJpelaar, D. J. H. Harmsen, M. Heringa, Techneau, D2.4.1.1, May 2007.
[39] E. F. Beerendonk, New Concepts of UV/H₂O₂ Oxidation, Project number B111.604BTO 2011.046, 2011.
[40] S. Parra, V. Sarria, S. Malato, P. Peringer, C. Pulgarin, Appl. Catal. B, 2000, 27, 153-168.
[41] M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 69-96.
[42] A. Fujishima, X. T. Zhang, D. A. Tryk, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2008, 63, 515-582
[43] S. Demirel-Gülen, M. Lucas, P. Claus, Catal. Today, 2005, 102-103, 166-172.
[44] S. Carrettin, P. McMorn, P. Johnston, K. Griffin, C. J. Kielly, G. J. Hutchings, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 1329-1336.
[45] S. Gil, M. Marchena, L. Sánchez-Silva, A. Romero, P. Sánchez, J. L. Valverde, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 178, 423-435.
[46] J. Deleplanque, J. L. Dubois, J. F. Devaux, W. Ueda, Catal. Today, 2010, 157, 351-358.

电子受体H₂O₂和O₂对TiO₂光催化甘油氧化反应中活性氧物种¹O₂和OH^·的影响

Effect of electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the generated reactive oxygen species ¹O₂ and OH^· in TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxidation of glycerol

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	蔡铭洁, 刘艳萍, 董珂欣, 陈晓波, 李世杰. 漂浮型Bi₂WO₆/C₃N₄/碳布S型异质结光催化材料用于高效净化水体环境[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 239-251.
[2]	乔秀清, 李晨, 王紫昭, 侯东芳, 李东升. TiO_2-_x@C/MoO₂肖特基结: 合理设计及高效电荷分离提升光催化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 66-79.
[3]	袁鑫, 范海滨, 刘杰, 覃龙州, 王剑, 段秀, 邱江凯, 郭凯. 连续流技术在光氧化还原催化转化的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 175-194.
[4]	Mengistu Tulu Gonfa, 申升, 陈浪, 胡彪, 周威, 白张君, 区泽堂, 尹双凤. 光催化苯制苯酚的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 49(6): 16-41.
[5]	李宁, 高雪云, 苏俊珲, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 类金属WO₂/g-C₃N₄复合光催化剂的构造及其优异的光催化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 161-170.
[6]	王伟康, 梅少斌, 蒋浩朋, 王乐乐, 唐华, 刘芹芹. 二氧化钛基S型异质结光催化剂的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 137-158.
[7]	王宁宁, 王硕, 李灿, 李晨阳, 刘春江, 陈闪山, 章福祥. ZrO₂修饰均匀氮掺杂氧化物MgTa₂O_6-_xN_x以提升其光催化分解水性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 54(11): 220-228.
[8]	刘伟旭, 贺唱, 朱博文, 朱恩伟, 张亚宁, 陈云宁, 李军山, 朱永法. 利用有机超分子光催化剂在太阳光下处理污水的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 13-30.
[9]	师凯, 司娣, 滕雪, 陈立松, 施剑林. 用于高效电催化甘油氧化的CuCoN_0.6/CP催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 143-152.
[10]	雷一鸣, 叶金花, Jordi García-Antón, 刘慧敏. 内建电场辅助光催化甲烷干重整的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 72-101.
[11]	杨辉, 代凯, 张金锋, Graham Dawson. 无机-有机杂化光催化剂: 合成、机理及应用[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2111-2140.
[12]	吴玉兰, 祁明雨, 谭昌龙, 唐紫蓉, 徐艺军. CdS/WO₃复合材料用于光催化选择性芳香醇氧化及析氢反应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1851-1859.
[13]	王爱霞, 张临河, 李旭力, 高旸钦, 李宁, 卢贵武, 戈磊. 三元复合材料Ni₂P@UiO-66-NH₂/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S的合成及其显著提升光催化产氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(5): 1295-1305.
[14]	陈方帅, 吴崇备, 郑耿锋, 曲良体, 韩庆. 少层氮化碳光催化剂合成太阳燃料和高附加值化学品: 现状与展望[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(5): 1216-1229.
[15]	张亚萍, 徐继香, 周洁, 王磊. 金属-有机框架衍生的多功能光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 971-1000.